Title:
Performance, Durability and Life Cycle Impacts of Concrete Produced with CO2 as an Admixture
Author(s):
Sean Monkman, Ryan Cialdella, and Jose Pacheco
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
120
Issue:
1
Appears on pages(s):
53-62
Keywords:
admixture; carbon dioxide use; carbon footprint; durability; Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs); life cycle analysis; sustainability
DOI:
10.14359/51734732
Date:
1/1/2023
Abstract:
An important part of improving the embodied carbon of the built environment is reducing carbon emissions associated with concrete. The long-term limitations around the availability of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) to replace portland cement have driven the search for additional innovative approaches. The beneficial use of carbon dioxide (CO2) in ready mixed concrete production has been developed and installed as retrofit technology with industrial users. An optimum dose of CO2 added to concrete as an admixture leads to the in-place formation of mineralized calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and can increase the concrete compressive
strength. The improved performance can be leveraged to design concrete mixture proportions for a more efficient use of portland cement, along with the use of CO2 to reduce the carbon footprint of concrete. One producer has used the technology, starting in 2016, at over 50 plants. More than 3 million m3 of concrete have been shipped with an estimated net savings of 35,000 tonnes of CO2. The concrete produced with carbon dioxide is discussed in terms of the fresh and hardened performance, durability performance, and life
cycle impacts.
Related References:
1. Monkman, S.; Lee, B. E. J.; Grandfield, K.; MacDonald, M.; and Raki, L., “The Impacts of In-Situ Carbonate Seeding on the Early Hydration of Tricalcium Silicate,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 136, 2020, Article No. 106179. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106179
2. Miller, S. A.; Horvath, A.; and Monteiro, P. J. M., “Readily Implementable Techniques Can Cut Annual CO2 Emissions from the Production of Concrete by Over 20%,” Environmental Research Letters, V. 11, No. 7, 2016, Article No. 074029. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074029
3. IEA and CSI, “Technology Roadmap: Low-Carbon Transition in the Cement Industry,” International Energy Agency, Paris, France, and Cement Sustainability Initiative, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018, 66 pp.
4. UN Environment; Scrivener, K. L.; John, V. M.; and Gartner, E. M., “Eco-Efficient Cements: Potential Economically Viable Solutions for a Low-CO2 Cement-Based Materials Industry,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 114, 2018, pp. 2-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.015
5. Favier, A.; De Wolf, C.; Scrivener, K.; and Habert, G., “A Sustainable Future for the European Cement and Concrete Industry: Technology Assessment for Full Decarbonisation of the Industry by 2050,” ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2018, 96 pp.
6. PCA, “Roadmap to Carbon Neutrality,” Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 2021, 73 pp.
7. Ashraf, W., “Carbonation of Cement-Based Materials: Challenges and Opportunities,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 120, 2016, pp. 558-570. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.080
8. Xie, H.; Yue, H.; Zhu, J.; Liang, B.; Li, C.; Wang, Y.; Xie, L.; and Zhou, X., “Scientific and Engineering Progress in CO2 Mineralization Using Industrial Waste and Natural Minerals,” Engineering, V. 1, No. 1, 2015, pp. 150-157. doi: 10.15302/J-ENG-2015017
9. Berger, R. L.; Young, J. F.; and Leung, K., “Acceleration of Hydration of Calcium Silicates by Carbon Dioxide Treatment,” Nature Physical Science, V. 240, No. 97, 1972, pp. 16-18.
10. Monkman, S.; Kenward, P. A.; Dipple, G.; MacDonald, M.; and Raudsepp, M., “Activation of Cement Hydration with Carbon Dioxide,” Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, V. 7, No. 3, 2018, pp. 160-181. doi: 10.1080/21650373.2018.1443854
11. Monkman, S., and MacDonald, M., “On Carbon Dioxide Utilization as a Means to Improve the Sustainability of Ready-Mixed Concrete,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 167, 2017, pp. 365-375. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.194
12. Monkman, S., “Sustainable Ready Mixed Concrete Production Using Waste CO2: A Case Study,” Recent Advances in Concrete Technology and Sustainability Issues - Proceedings: Fourteenth International Conference, Beijing, China, SP-330, T. Sui, T. C. Holland, Z. Wang, and X. Zhao, eds., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2018, pp. 163-174.
13. Monkman, S.; Grandfield, K.; and Langelier, B., “On the Mechanism of Using Carbon Dioxide as a Beneficial Concrete Admixture,” Superplasticizers and Other Chemical Admixtures in Concrete - Proceedings: Twelfth International Conference, Beijing, China, SP-329, J. Liu, Z. Wang, T. C. Holland, J. Huang, and J. Plank, eds., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2018, pp. 415-428.
14. Monkman, S.; Sargam, Y.; Naboka, O.; and Lothenbach, B., “Early Age Impacts of CO2 Activation on the Tricalcium Silicate and Cement Systems,” Journal of CO2 Utilization, V. 65, 2022, Article No. 102254.
15. AASHTO T 358-17, “Standard Method of Test for Surface Resistivity Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2017.
16. ASTM C1202-19, “Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019, 8 pp.
17. ASTM G109-07(2013), “Standard Test Method for Determining Effects of Chemical Admixtures on Corrosion of Embedded Steel Reinforcement in Concrete Exposed to Chloride Environments,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2007, 6 pp.
18. Schiessl, P.; Bamforth, P.; Baroghel-Bouny, V.; Corley, G.; Faber, M.; Forbes, J.; Gehlen, C.; Helene, P.; Helland, S.; Ishida, T.; Markeset, G.; Nilsson, L.-O.; Rostam, S.; Siemes, A. J. M.; and Walraven, J., “fib Bulletin No. 34: Model Code for Service Life Design,” International Federation for Structural Concrete, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2006, 116 pp.
19. ASTM C494/C494M-19, “Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019, 15 pp.
20. ASTM C403/C403M-16, “Standard Test Method for Time of Setting of Concrete Mixtures by Penetration Resistance,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 7 pp.
21. ASTM C78/C78M-21, “Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading),” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2021, 5 pp.
22. ASTM C157/C157M-17, “Standard Test Method for Length Change of Hardened Hydraulic-Cement Mortar and Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, 8 pp.
23. ASTM C666/C666M-15, “Standard Test Method for Resistance of Concrete to Rapid Freezing and Thawing,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, 7 pp.
24. Garvey, M. D., “New Sources Onstream – More Strategic Sources Needed,” gasworld US Edition, Apr. 1, 2020.
25. fib Task Group 8.7, “fib Bulletin No. 70: Code-Type Models for Structural Behaviour of Concrete: Background of the Constitutive Relations and Material Models in the fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010: State-of-Art Report,” International Federation for Structural Concrete, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2013, 196 pp.
26. Damineli, B. L.; Kemeid, F. M.; Aguiar, P. S.; and John, V. M., “Measuring the Eco-Efficiency of Cement Use,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 32, No. 8, 2010, pp. 555-562. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.07.009