Axial Behavior of Columns Confined with Engineered Cementitious Composite

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Axial Behavior of Columns Confined with Engineered Cementitious Composite

Author(s): Khandaker M. Anwar Hossain, Sandeep Parajuli, and Tanvir Manzur

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 119

Issue: 1

Appears on pages(s): 67-76

Keywords: axial behavior; confined column; ductility; energy absorption capacity; engineered cementitious composite (ECC); load-deflection response; self-consolidating concrete (SCC); ultimate load capacity

DOI: 10.14359/51734217

Date: 1/1/2022

Abstract:
The axial behavior of self-consolidating concrete (SCC) columns confined with engineered cementitious composite (ECC) was investigated through experimental and analytical investigations. Both square and cylindrical-shaped columns were considered in the study. The other variables of the study were the presence or absence of longitudinal reinforcement, the thickness of ECC confinement, and the loading types. The behavior of the columns was evaluated in terms of the axial load-deflection response, strain characteristics, ultimate load-carrying capacity, ductility, energy absorption capacity, and modes of failure. It was found that the ECC confinement significantly increased the ultimate axial load capacity and energy absorption of the SCC columns. The confined columns also exhibited enhanced ductile behavior compared to the corresponding core column under axial loading. The confined concrete strengths predicted by existing analytical models were found to be in satisfactory agreement with the experimentally obtained values.

Related References:

1. Shang, X.-Y.; Yu, J.-T.; Li, L.-Z.; and Lu, Z.-D., “Strengthening of RC Structures by Using Engineered Cementitious Composites: A Review,” Sustainability, V. 11, No. 12, 2019, p. 3384. doi: 10.3390/su11123384

2. Zhou, J., and Wang, L., “Repair of Fire-Damaged Reinforced Concrete Members with Axial Load: A Review,” Sustainability, V. 11, No. 4, 2019, p. 963. doi: 10.3390/su11040963

3. Lai, M. H.; Hanzic, L.; and Ho, J. C. M., “Fillers to Improve Passing Ability of Concrete,” Structural Concrete, V. 20, No. 1, 2019, pp. 185-197. doi: 10.1002/suco.201800047

4. Deng, J.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, T.; and Li, H., “Study on Axial Compressive Capacity of FRP-Confined Concrete-Filled Steel Tubes and Its Comparisons with Other Composite Structural Systems,” International Journal of Polymer Science, V. 2017, 2017, 7 pp. doi: 10.1155/2017/6272754

5. AL-Gemeel, A. N., and Zhuge, Y., “Experimental Investigation of Textile Reinforced Engineered Cementitious Composite (ECC) for Square Concrete Column Confinement,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 174, June 2018, pp. 594-602. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.161

6. Raza, S.; Khan, M. K. I.; Menegon, S. J.; Tsang, H.-H.; and Wilson, J. L., “Strengthening and Repair of Reinforced Concrete Columns by Jacketing: State-of-the-Art Review,” Sustainability, V. 11, No. 11, 2019, p. 3208. doi: 10.3390/su11113208

7. Triantafillou, T. C.; Papanicolaou, G.; Zissimopoulos, P.; and Laourdekis,, T., “Concrete Confinement with Textile-Reinforced Mortar Jackets,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2006, pp. 28-37.

8. Bournas, D. A.; Lontou, P. V.; Papanicolaou, C. G.; and Triantafillou, T. C., “Textile-Reinforced Mortar versus Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Confinement in Reinforced Concrete Columns,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 104, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2007, pp. 740-748.

9. Triantafillou, T. C., and Papanicolau, C. G., “Textile Reinforced Mortars (TRM) versus Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRP) as Strengthening Materials of Concrete Structures,” Symposium of the Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Reinforced Concrete Structures (FRPRCS-7), Kansas City, MO, 2005, pp. 99-117.

10. Ozbakkaloglu, T., and Xie, T., “Geopolymer Concrete-Filled FRP Tubes: Behavior of Circular and Square Columns under Axial Compression,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 96, July 2016, pp. 215-230. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.013

11. Ozbakkaloglu, T., “Behavior of Square and Rectangular Ultra-High-Strength Concrete-Filled FRP Tubes under Axial Compression,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 54, Nov. 2013, pp. 97-111. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.05.007

12. Hossain, K. M. A.; Hasib, S.; and Manzur, T., “Shear Behavior of Novel Hybrid Composite Beams Made of Self-Consolidating Concrete and Engineered Cementitious Composites,” Engineering Structures, V. 202, Jan. 2020.

13. Li, V. C., “Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) - A Review of the Material and Its Applications,” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, V. 1, No. 3, 2003, pp. 215-230. doi: 10.3151/jact.1.215

14. Li, V. C.; Wang, S.; and Wu, C., “Tensile Strain-Hardening Behavior of Polyvinyl Alcohol Engineered Cementitious Composite (PVA-ECC),” ACI Materials Journal, V. 98, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2001, pp. 483-492.

15. Lee, C. K.; Khan, M. K. I.; Zhang, Y. X.; and Rana, M. M., “Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) Encased Concrete-Steel Composite Stub Columns under Concentric Compression,” Structures, V. 24, Apr. 2020, pp. 386-399. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.01.023

16. Deng, M.; Zhang, Y.; and Li, Q., “Shear Strengthening of RC Short Columns with ECC Jacket: Cyclic Behavior Tests,” Engineering Structures, V. 160, Apr. 2018, pp. 535-545. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.061

17. Khan, M. K. I.; Rana, M. M.; Zhang, Y.; and Lee, C. K., “Behaviour of Engineered Cementitious Composite-Encased Stub Concrete Columns under Axial Compression,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 72, No. 19, Oct. 2020, pp. 984-1005.

18. Li, V. C., and Kanda, T., “Engineered Cementitious Composites for Structural Applications,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 10, No. 2, May 1998, pp. 66-69. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1998)10:2(66)

19. Yuan, W., and Mirmiran, A., “Buckling Analysis of Concrete-Filled FRP Tubes,” International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, V. 01, No. 03, 2001, pp. 367-383. doi: 10.1142/S0219455401000251

20. Kusumaningrum, P., “Numerical Modelling of RC and ECC Encased RC Columns Subjected to Close-In Explosion,” PhD thesis, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore, 2010, 353 pp.

21. Lachemi, M.; Hossain, K. M. A.; Lambros, V.; Nkinamubanzi, P.-C.; and Bouzoubaâ, N., “Self-Consolidating Concrete Incorporating New Viscosity Modifying Admixtures,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 34, No. 6, June 2004, pp. 917-926. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.10.024

22. Ozawa, K.; Maekawa, K.; Kunishima, H.; and Okamura, H., “Performance of Concrete Based on the Durability Design of Concrete Structures,” The Second East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction 1, 1989, pp. 445-456.

23. Khayat, K. H.; Bickley, J.; and Lessard, M., “Performance of Self-Consolidating Concrete for Casting Basement and Foundation Walls,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 97, No. 3, May-June 2000, pp. 374-380.

24. Lachemi, M.; Hossain, K. M. A.; Lambros, V.; and Bouzoubaâ, N., “Development of Cost-Effective Self-Consolidating Concrete Incorporating Fly Ash, Slag Cement or Viscosity-Modifying Admixtures,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 100, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2003, pp. 419-425.

25. Torres, E.; Seo, J.; and Lederle, R. E., “Experimental and Statistical Investigation of Self-Consolidating Concrete Mixture Constituents for Prestressed Bridge Girder Fabrication,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 29, No. 9, Sept. 2017, p. 04017141. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001968

26. Torres, E., and Seo, J., “State-of-the-Art and Practice Review and Recommended Testing Protocol: Self-Consolidating Concrete for Prestressed Bridge Girders,” European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, V. 21, No. 12, 2016, pp. 1419-1440. doi: 10.1080/19648189.2016.1170730

27. ASTM C469/C469M-14e1, “Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014, 5 pp.

28. ASTM C39/C39M-16, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 7 pp.

29. ASTM C496/C496M-11, “Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011, 5 pp.

30. ASTM C150/C150M-18, “Standard Specification for Portland Cement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018, 9 pp.

31. Parajuli, S., “Axial Strength of Lightweight Self-Consolidating Concrete Columns with Engineered Cementitious Composite Confinement,” MASc thesis, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2018, 142 pp.

32. Mander, J. B.; Priestley, M. J. N.; and Park, R., “Theoretical Stress-Strain Model for Confined Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 114, No. 8, Sept. 1988, pp. 1804-1826. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)

33. Richart, F. E.; Brandtzaeg, A.; and Brown, R. L., “The Failure of Plain and Spirally Reinforced Concrete in Compression,” University of Illinois Bulletin, V. XXVI, No. 31, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, Apr. 1929, 80 pp.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer