Title:
Rheology and Setting Control of Concrete for Digital Construction
Author(s):
L. S. C. Ko, S. Moro, J. Bury, T. Vickers, B. Sachsenhauser, and S. Mönnig
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
118
Issue:
6
Appears on pages(s):
167-175
Keywords:
accelerator; admixtures; dispersants; mortar; rheology; thixotropy; three-dimensional (3D) printing; viscosity
DOI:
10.14359/51733121
Date:
11/1/2021
Abstract:
To ensure a successful outcome when using cementitious materials during three-dimensional (3D) printing operations, the effects of chemical admixtures on rheological and setting behavior must be carefully adjusted to accommodate the needs for pumping, extrusion, deposition, and self-sustainability without the support of formwork. This paper highlights potential solutions offered by chemical admixtures, while discussing various testing methods and important influencing parameters. The impact of commercial polymers on viscosity, initial yield stress, thixotropy, and their variations over time are reported. Influencing factors, such as mixing energy and material interactions, are discussed. Accelerating and strength-enhancing admixtures are used to illustrate the adjustment of setting and early strength development of concrete. Understanding the possibilities of modifying fresh concrete properties will help to improve the robotic construction process as well as the design or adaptation of the printing equipment.
Related References:
1. Paul, S. C.; van Zijl, G. P. A. G.; Tan, M. J.; and Gibson, I., “A Review of 3D Concrete Printing Systems and Materials Properties: Current Status and Future Research Prospects,” Rapid Prototyping Journal, V. 24, No. 4, 2018, pp. 784-798. doi: 10.1108/RPJ-09-2016-0154
2. Roussel, N., “Rheological Requirements for Printable Concretes,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 112, 2018, pp. 76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.005
3. Zareiyan, B., and Khoshnevis, B., “Effects of Interlocking on Interlayer Adhesion and Strength of Structures in 3D Printing of Concrete,” Automation in Construction, V. 83, 2017, pp. 212-221. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.019
4. Dressler, I.; Freund, N.; and Lowke, D., “The Effect of Accelerator Dosage on Fresh Concrete Properties and on Interlayer Strength in Shotcrete 3D Printing,” Materials (Basel), V. 13, No. 2, 2020, pp. 374-392. doi: 10.3390/ma13020374
5. Varela, H.; Barluenga, G.; and Palomar, I., “Rheology Evaluation of Cement Paste with Nanoclays, Nanosilica and Polymeric,” Digital Concrete, 2020, pp. 144-151.
6. Mohan, M.K.; Rahul, A.V.; Van Tittelboom, K.; and De Schutter, G., “Evaluating the Influence of Aggregate Content on Pumpability of 3D Printable Concrete,” Digital Concrete, 2020, pp. 333-341.
7. Marchon, D.; Kawashima, S.; Bessaies-Bey, H.; Mantellato, S.; and Ng, S., “Hydration and Rheology Control of Concrete for Digital Fabrication: Potential Admixtures and Cement Chemistry,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 112, 2018, pp. 96-110. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.014
8. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, G.; Yang, Y.; Wu, M.; and Pang, B., “Fresh Properties of a Novel 3D Printing Concrete Ink,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 174, 2018, pp. 263-271. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.115
9. Reiter, L.; Wangler, T.; Roussel, N.; and Flatt, R., “The Role of Early Age Structural Build-up in Digital Fabrication with Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 112, 2018, pp. 86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.011
10. Wolfs, R. J. M.; Bos, F. P.; and Salet, T. A. M., “Early Age Mechanical Behaviour of 3D Printed Concrete: Numerical Modelling and Experimental Testing,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 106, 2018, pp. 103-116. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.001
11. ASTM C143/C143M-20, “Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020.
12. ASTM C138/C138M-17a, “Standard Test Method for Density (Unit Weight), Yield and Air Content (Gravimetric) of Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017.
13. ASTM C231/C231M-17a, “Standard Test Method for Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Pressure Method,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017.
14. ASTM C403/C403M-16, “Standard Test Method for Time of Setting of Concrete Mixtures by Penetration Resistance,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016.
15. ASTM C39/C39M-20, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020.
16. WASP extruder, https://www.3dwasp.com/en/.
17. Yamada, K.; Ogawa, S.; and Hanehara, S., “Controlling of the Adsorption and Dispersing Force of Polycarboxylate-Type Superplasticizer by Sulfate Ion Concentration in Aqueous Phase,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 31, No. 3, 2001, pp. 375-383. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00503-2
18. EN 1015-3, “Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry - Part 3: Determination of Consistence of Fresh Mortar (by Flow Table),” European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels, Belgium.