Title:
Mitigation of Early Thermal Contraction Cracks in Massive Footings
Author(s):
Rodrigo Antunes and Mang Tia
Publication:
Structural Journal
Volume:
118
Issue:
6
Appears on pages(s):
193-200
Keywords:
degree of restraint; modulus of elasticity; temperature; tensile strength; thermal crack; thermal expansion; thermal stress
DOI:
10.14359/51733078
Date:
11/1/2021
Abstract:
This experimental research aimed to enhance thermal crack mitigation mechanisms for massive bridge footings by assessing thermal stresses (σth) associated with concrete temperatures, physical properties of concrete, and dimensions of 29 footings. Concrete mixtures for massive footing applications should be tested for modulus of elasticity (MOE), coefficient of linear thermal expansion (CTE), and splitting tensile strength (fct′) so that the σth can be anticipated and compared to the respective fct′. Although such concrete properties are often neglected, their importance to crack mitigation is paramount. The σth of bridge footings were established based on actual degrees of restraint (K), temperature variations (ΔT), MOE, and CTE, then compared to fct′. The results suggested that the enhanced crack mitigation threshold should be expressed by the maximum ΔT for which a footing’s σth/fct′ ≤ 0.25.
Related References:
1. ACI Committee 207, “Report on Thermal and Volume Change Effects on Cracking of Mass Concrete (ACI 207.2R-07),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2007, 28 pp.
2. Gajda, J., Mass Concrete for Buildings and Bridges, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 2007, 44 pp.
3. ACI Committee 207, “Guide to Mass Concrete (ACI 207.1R-05),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2005, 30 pp.
4. Mehta, P. K., and Monteiro, P. J. M., Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, McGraw Hill, New York, 2014.
5. FitzGibbon, M. E., “Large Potts for Reinforced Concrete Structures,” Concrete, Cement and Concrete Association, Wexham Springs, UK, 1976.
6. NYSDOT, “Standard Specification,” New York State Department of Transportation, New York, NY, 2020.
7. FDOT, “Standard Specification,” Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL, 2020.
8. Caltrans, “Standard Specification,” California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA, 2020.
9. Richardson, D., “Aggregate Gradation Optimization: Literature Search,” RDT 05–001, Missouri Department of Transportation, Jefferson City, MO, 2005.
10. De Larrard, F., Concrete Mixture Proportioning: A Scientific Approach, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1999.
11. Antunes, R., and Tia, M., “Effects of Aggregate Packing on Concrete Strength and Consistency,” Advances in Civil Engineering Materials, V. 7, No. 1, 2018, pp. 479-495. doi: 10.1520/ACEM20180030
12. Antunes, R., “Effects of Aggregate Gradation on Aggregate Packing,” PhD dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 2018.
13. ASTM C127-15, “Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, 5 pp.
14. ASTM C128-15, “Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Fine Aggregate,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, 6 pp.
15. ASTM C136/C136M-19, “Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019, 5 pp.
16. ASTM C150/C150M-20, “Standard Specification for Portland Cement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020, 9 pp.
17. ASTM C595/C595M-20, “Standard Specification for Blended Hydraulic Cements,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020, 8 pp.
18. ASTM C989/C989M-18a, “Standard Specification for Slag Cement for Use in Concrete and Mortars,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018, 7 pp.
19. Bynum Jr., R. T., Insulation Handbook, McGraw Hill, New York, 2001.
20. Cengel, Y. A., Heat Transfer: A Practical Approach, McGraw Hill, New York, 2002.
21. ASHRAE, “Handbook,” American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, GA, 2013.
22. Antunes, R., “High Temperature and Cracking: Equations to Avoid High-Heat Concrete Mixtures in Massive Bridge Footings,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 33, No. 12, 2021, pp. 04021354-1-04021354-8. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003979
23. ASTM C496/C496M-17, “Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, 5 pp.
24. ASTM C469/C469M-14, “Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014, 5 pp.
25. AASHTO T 336, “Standard Method of Test for Coefficient of Thermal Expansion of Hydraulic Cement Concrete,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2015.
26. Tia, M.; Subgranon, T.; Chung, H.; and Han, S., “Mitigation of Cracking in Florida Structural Concrete,” Project BDV31-977-47, Florida Department of Transportation, Gainesville, FL, 2020, 270 pp.