Title:
Long-Term Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Aggregate Concrete
Author(s):
Charitha Seneviratne, Chamila Gunasekara, David W. Law, Sujeeva Setunge, and Dilan Robert
Publication:
Structural Journal
Volume:
118
Issue:
5
Appears on pages(s):
135-147
Keywords:
fly ash; geopolymer aggregate; mechanical properties; micro-structure; nanoindentation; sustainability
DOI:
10.14359/51732823
Date:
9/1/2021
Abstract:
Geopolymer aggregate (GPA) is a novel coarse aggregate synthesized from low-calcium fly ash with a highly alkaline activator. It is also classified as a lightweight aggregate, having a density of 1709 kg/m3 (106.7 lb/ft3). This paper reports the findings of the detailed investigation of mechanical properties of GPA concrete, which was observed up to a period of 1 year. The characteristics of GPA concrete were benchmarked against conventional basalt aggregate concrete. Compressive, flexural, and splitting tensile strengths, elastic modulus, and Poisson’s ratio of GPA concrete ranged from 42.1 to 50.81 MPa (6.1 to 7.37 ksi), 4.75 to 5.27 MPa (0.69 to 0.76 ksi), 3.02 to 3.66 MPa (0.44 to 0.53 ksi), 20 to 20.5 GPa (2900 to 2973 ksi), and 0.13 to 0.11, respectively within a 90- to 365-day period. The correlations between existing concrete standards and major mechanical properties of GPA concrete are discussed. Relationships are developed between compressive strength and mechanical properties including flexural strength, splitting tensile strength, and elastic modulus using statistical regression analysis. The suitability of using the existing relation-ships in Australian standards and American Concrete Institute codes for GPA concrete are critically examined. In addition, the microstructure of GPA concrete was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging and microhardness testing. The thickness of the interfacial transition zone (ITZ) is estimated to be 55, 50, and 45 μm (21.65 × 10–4, 19.68 × 10–4, and 17.72 × 10–4 in.) at 28, 90, and 365 days, respectively. Overall, the observations of this study verify the potential of using GPA concrete in various structural applications, making it a viable and sustainable alternative to conventional aggregate concrete.
Related References:
1. Millington, B., “Coal Ash has Become one of Australia's Biggest Waste Problems — And a Solution is Being Ignored,” Australian Broadcasting Corporation, 10 March 2019, www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-10/coal-ash-has-become-one-of-australias-biggest-waste-problems/10886866. (last accessed July 9, 2021)
2. Razak, R.; Abdullah, M. M. A.-B.; Kamarudin, H.; Nizar, K.; Hardjito, D.; and Yahya, Z., “Performances of Artificial Lightweight Geopolymer Aggregate (ALGA) in OPC Concrete,” Key Engineering Materials, V. 673, 2016, pp. 29-35. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.673.29
3. Bijen, J. M. J. M., “Manufacturing Processes of Artificial Lightweight Aggregates from Fly Ash,” International Journal of Cement Composites and Lightweight Concrete, V. 8, No. 3, 1986, pp. 191-199. doi: 10.1016/0262-5075(86)90040-0
4. Tajra, F.; Elrahman, M. A.; and Stephan, D., “The Production and Properties of Cold-Bonded Aggregate and its Applications in Concrete: A Review,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 225, 2019, pp. 29-43. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.219
5. Nadesan, M. S., and Dinakar, P., “Structural Concrete Using Sintered Flyash Lightweight Aggregate: A Review,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 154, 2017, pp. 928-944. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.005
6. Chi, J. M.; Huang, R.; Yang, C. C.; and Chang, J. J., “Effect of Aggregate Properties on the Strength and Stiffness of Lightweight Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 25, No. 2, 2003, pp. 197-205. doi: 10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00020-3
7. Geetha, S., and Ramamurthy, K., “Environmental Friendly Technology of Cold-Bonded Bottom Ash Aggregate Manufacture through Chemical Activation,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 18, No. 15, 2010, pp. 1563-1569. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.006
8. Gesoğlu, M.; Özturan, T.; and Güneyisi, E., “Shrinkage Cracking of Lightweight Concrete Made with Cold-Bonded Fly Ash Aggregates,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 34, No. 7, 2004, pp. 1121-1130. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.11.024
9. Vasugi, V., and Ramamurthy, K., “Identification of Design Parameters Influencing Manufacture and Properties of Cold-Bonded Pond Ash Aggregate,” Materials & Design, V. 54, 2014, pp. 264-278. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.019
10. Singh, D. N., and Kolay, P. K., “Simulation of Ash–Water Interaction and its Influence on Ash Characteristics,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, V. 28, No. 3, 2002, pp. 267-299. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1285(01)00018-1
11. Harikrishnan, K. I., and Ramamurthy, K., “Influence of Pelletization Process on the Properties of Fly Ash Aggregates,” Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), V. 26, No. 8, 2006, pp. 846-852. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.10.012
12. Tang, P.; Florea, M. V. A.; and Brouwers, H. J. H., “Employing Cold Bonded Pelletization to Produce Lightweight Aggregates from Incineration Fine Bottom Ash,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 165, 2017, pp. 1371-1384. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.234
13. Cioffi, R.; Colangelo, F.; Montagnaro, F.; and Santoro, L., “Manufacture of Artificial Aggregate Using MSWI Bottom Ash,” Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), V. 31, No. 2, 2011, pp. 281-288. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.05.020
14. Cheeseman, C. R.; Makinde, A.; and Bethanis, S., “Properties of Lightweight Aggregate Produced by Rapid Sintering of Incinerator Bottom Ash,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, V. 43, No. 2, 2005, pp. 147-162. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.05.004
15. AS 2758.1:2014, “Aggregates and Rock for Engineering Purposes, Part 1: Concrete Aggregates,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia. 2014, 34 pp.
16. Terzić, A.; Pezo, L.; Mitić, V.; and Radojević, Z., “Artificial Fly Ash Based Aggregates Properties Influence on Lightweight Concrete Performances,” Ceramics International, V. 41, No. 2, 2015, pp. 2714-2726. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.10.086
17. Lambert, G., “Properties and Behaviour of Structural Lightweight (Lytag-Sand) Concrete,” Civil and Structural Engineering. 1982, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 288 pp.
18. Gomathi, P., and Sivakumar, A., “Accelerated Curing Effects on the Mechanical Performance of Cold Bonded and Sintered Fly Ash Aggregate Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 77, 2015, pp. 276-287. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.108
19. Gunasekara, C.; Setunge, S.; and Law, D. W., “Long-Term Mechanical Properties of Different Fly Ash Geopolymers,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 114, No. 3, 2017, pp. 743-752. doi: 10.14359/51689454
20. Ma, C.-K.; Awang, A. Z.; and Omar, W., “Structural and Material Performance of Geopolymer Concrete: A Review,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 186, 2018, pp. 90-102. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.111
21. Hassan, A.; Arif, M.; and Shariq, M., “Use of Geopolymer Concrete for a Cleaner and Sustainable Environment – A Review of Mechanical Properties and Microstructure,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 223, 2019, pp. 704-728. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.051
22. Parvathy, S. S.; Sharma, A. K.; and Anand, K. B., “Comparative Study on Synthesis and Properties of Geopolymer Fine Aggregate from Fly Ashes,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 198, 2019, pp. 359-367. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.231
23. Jamieson, E. J.; Penna, B.; van Riessen, A.; and Nikraz, H., “The Development of Bayer Derived Geopolymers as Artificial Aggregates,” Hydrometallurgy, V. 170, 2017, pp. 74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.05.001
24. Bui, L. A.-T.; Hwang, C.-L.; Chen, C.-T.; Lin, K.-L.; and Hsieh, M.-Y., “Manufacture and Performance of Cold Bonded Lightweight Aggregate Using Alkaline Activators for High Performance Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 35, 2012, pp. 1056-1062. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.032
25. Shivaprasad, K. N., and Das, B. B., “Determination of optimized Geopolymerization Factors on the Properties of Pelletized Fly Ash Aggregates,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 163, 2018, pp. 428-437. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.038
26. Gunasekara, C.; Setunge, S.; Law, D. W.; Willis, N.; and Burt, T., “Engineering Properties of Geopolymer Aggregate Concrete,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 30, No. 11, 2018, pp. 1-11. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002501
27. Willis, N., “Geopolymers and Geopolymer Aggregates,” International Publication No. WO2016/023073 A1, World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 2016.
28. Duxson, P.; Fernández-Jiménez, A.; Provis, J. L.; Lukey, G. C.; Palomo, A.; and van Deventer, J. S. J., “Geopolymer Technology: The Current State of the Art,” Journal of Materials Science, V. 42, No. 9, 2007, pp. 2917-2933. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z
29. Gunasekera, C.; Law, D. W.; and Setunge, S., “Effect of Geopolymer Aggregate on Strength and Microstructure of Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 115, No. 6, Nov. 2018, pp. 899-908. doi: 10.14359/51706846
30. Belkowitz, J. S., and Armentrout, D., “An Investigation of Nano Silica in the Cement Hydration Process,” National Ready Mixed Concrete Association Concrete Sustainability Conference, 2010, Doha, Qatar.
31. Hardjito, D.; Wallah, S. E.; Sumajouw, D. M. J.; and Rangan, B. V., “On the Development of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 101, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2004, pp. 467-472.
32. Diaz-Loya, E. I.; Erez, N. A.; and Saiprasad, V., “Mechanical Properties of Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 108, No. 3, May-June 2011, pp. 300-306.
33. ASTM C150/C150M-18, “Standard Specification for Portland Cement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018, 8 pp.
34. Neville, A. M., Properties of Concrete, fifth edition, Pearson Education, London, UK, 2012, 872 pp.
35. AS 1141.21, “Methods for Sampling and Testing Aggregates Aggregate Crushing Value,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 1997, 9 pp.
36. RC 371.03, “Aggregate Impact Value,” Victoria Transport Resources, Melbourne, Australia, 2013, 3 pp.
37. AS 1141.23, “Methods for Sampling and Testing Aggregates Los Angeles Value,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 2009, 7 pp.
38. AS 1141.4, “Bulk Density of Aggregate, in Methods for Sampling and Testing Aggregates,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 2000, 7 pp.
39. ASTM C127-15, “Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, 7 pp.
40. AS 1012.3.1:2014, “Method 3.1: Determination of Properties Related to the Consistency of Concrete - Slump Test,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 2014, 9 pp.
41. AS 1012.8.1:2014, “Method for Making and Curing Concrete - Compression and Indirect Tensile Test Specimens,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 2014, 10 pp.
42. AS 1012.9:2014, “Method 9: Compressive Strength Tests - Concrete, Mortar and Grout Specimens,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 2014, 13 pp.
43. AS 1012.10-2000, “Method 10: Determination of Indirect Tensile Strength of Concrete Cylinders (‘Brazil’ or Splitting Test),” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 2014, 6 pp.
44. AS 1012.11-2000 (R2014), “Determination of the Modulus of Rupture,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 2000, 8 pp.
45. AS 1012.17-1997 (R2014), “Method 17: Determination of the Static Chord Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson's Ratio of Concrete Specimens,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 1997, 19 pp.
46. AS 1012.12.2-1998 (R2014), “Method 12.2: Determination of Mass per Unit Volume of Hardened Concrete - Water Displacement Method,” 2014, Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 7 pp.
47. AS 3600:2018, “Concrete Structures,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 2018, 269 pp.
48. Al-Sibahy, A., and Edwards, R., “Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Novel Lightweight Concrete Mixtures Containing Recycled Glass and Metakaolin,” Construction & Building Materials, V. 31, 2012, pp. 157-167. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.095
49. Chandra, S., and Berntsson, L., “Lightweight Aggregate Concrete,” Science, Technology, and Applications, first edition, L. Berntsson, ed., Noyes Publications. Norwich, NJ, 2003.
50. Topçu, İ. B., and Uygunoğlu, T., “Effect of Aggregate Type on Properties of Hardened Self-Consolidating Lightweight Concrete (SCLC),” Construction and Building Materials, V. 24, No. 7, 2010, pp. 1286-1295. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.007
51. Wang, P. T.; Shah, S. P.; and Naaman, A. E., “Stress-Strain Curves of Normal and Lightweight Concrete in Compression,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 75, No. 11, Nov. 1978, pp. 603-611.
52. Warner, R. F.; Rangan, B. V.; and Hall, A. S., Reinforced Concrete, third edition, Pitman Australia, Melbourne, Australia, 1989.
53. Altman, D. G., and Gardner, M. J., “Statistics in Medicine: Calculating Confidence Intervals for Regression and Correlation,” British Medical Journal, V. 296, No. 6631, 1988, pp. 1238-1242. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6631.1238
54. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-08) and Commentary (ACI 318R-08),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2008, 473 pp.
55. ACI Committee 363, “Report on High-Strength Concrete (ACI 363R-92) (Reapproved 1997),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1992, 55 pp.
56. Zhang, M.-H., and Gjørv, O. E., “Microstructure of the Interfacial Zone between Lightweight Aggregate and Cement Paste,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 20, No. 4, 1990, pp. 610-618. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(90)90103-5
57. Shah, S. P., and Ahmad, S. H., High Performance Concretes and Applications, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1994.
58. Lau, A., and Anson, M., “Effect of High Temperatures on High Performance Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 36, No. 9, 2006, pp. 1698-1707. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.03.024
59. Sandor, P., “Effect of Curing Method and Final Moisture Condition on Compressive Strength of Concrete,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 83, No. 4, July-Aug. 1986, pp. 650-657.
60. Xie, J., and Kayali, O., “Effect of Initial Water Content and Curing Moisture Conditions on the Development of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymers in Heat and Ambient Temperature,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 67, 2014, pp. 20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.047
61. Hong, L.; Gu, X.-L.; Lin, F.; Gao, P.; and Sun, L.-Z., “Effects of Coarse Aggregate Form, Angularity, and Surface Texture on Concrete Mechanical Performance,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 31, No. 10, 2019, pp. 1-13. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002849
62. Siddique, R., and Klaus, J., “Influence of Metakaolin on the Properties of Mortar and Concrete: A Review,” Applied Clay Science, V. 43, No. 3-4, 2009, pp. 392-400. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2008.11.007
63. Babu, K. G., and Dinakar, P., “Strength Efficiency of Metakaolin in Concrete,” Structural Concrete, V. 7, No. 1, 2006, pp. 27-31. doi: 10.1680/stco.2006.7.1.27
64. Scrivener, K. L., “Backscattered Electron Imaging of Cementitious Microstructures: Understanding and Quantification,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 26, No. 8, 2004, pp. 935-945. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.029
65. Tasong, W. A.; Lynsdale, C. J.; and Cripps, J. C., “Aggregate-Cement Paste Interface,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 29, No. 7, 1999, pp. 1019-1025. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00086-1
66. Xiao, J.; Li, W.; Sun, Z.; Lange, D. A.; and Shah, S. P., “Properties of Interfacial Transition Zones in Recycled Aggregate Concrete Tested by Nanoindentation,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 37, 2013, pp. 276-292. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.01.006
67. Igarashi, S.-I., and Kawamura, M., “Effects of a Size in Bundled Fibers on the Interfacial Zone between the Fibers and the Cement Paste Matrix,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 24, No. 4, 1994, pp. 695-703. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(94)90193-7
68. Bucaille, J.; Felder, E.; and Hochstetter, G., “Identification of the Viscoplastic Behavior of a Polycarbonate Based on Experiments and Numerical Modeling of the Nano-Indentation Test,” Journal of Materials Science, V. 37, No. 18, 2002, pp. 3999-4011. doi: 10.1023/A:1019644630927