Slender Columns Reinforced by High-Strength Steel Reinforcing Bars and Retrofitted by Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Sheets

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Slender Columns Reinforced by High-Strength Steel Reinforcing Bars and Retrofitted by Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Sheets

Author(s): Masood Noroozolyaee and Davood Mostofinejad

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 117

Issue: 5

Appears on pages(s): 53-66

Keywords: circular slender column; eccentric loading; externally bonded reinforcement (EBR); externally bonded reinforcement on grooves (EBROG); fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composite; grooving method (GM); high-strength steel reinforcing bars; retrofitting; sec

DOI: 10.14359/51725887

Date: 9/1/2020

Abstract:
Consumption of high-strength steel (HSS) reinforcing bars is nowadays rising in concrete structures to compensate the deficient strength and corrosion resistance of normal-strength steel (NSS) ones. Where this provision fails to meet ultimate requirements, such concrete members as slender columns might need to be additionally retrofitted with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites. In this study, the behavior of nine circular slender columns reinforced with HSS reinforcing bars and strengthened with carbon FRP composites was studied under constant eccentric loading. For this purpose, columns with slenderness ratios in the range of 15.4 to 28 were strengthened using either methods of externally bonded reinforcement (EBR) or externally bonded reinforcement on grooves (EBROG). Results revealed the superiority of the EBROG-strengthened columns over the EBR-strengthened and non-strengthened ones in terms of increased load-carrying capacity and ductility as well as reduced secondary moments for each slenderness ratio tested. Moreover, the EBROG-strengthened columns were found to be less affected by secondary effects than were the EBR ones as slenderness ratio increased (this is evidenced by an increase of 5.9% in secondary to primary moment recorded for the EBROG ones versus the 20% increase for the EBR ones); also, ductility remained unchanged in both the control and EBROG specimens while it decreased by approximately 16% in the EBR ones as a result of increasing slenderness ratio. Finally, the results and overall behavior of slender column specimens reinforced with HSS reinforcing bars were compared with similar slender columns reinforced with NSS reinforcing bars in terms of strength, secondary effects, and ductility index.

Related References:

1. Hollaway, L. C., “A Review of the Present and Future Utilisation of FRP Composites in the Civil Infrastructure with Reference to their Important In-Service Properties,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 24, No. 12, 2010, pp. 2419-2445. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.062

2. Chaallal, O., and Shahawy, M., “Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Wrapped Reinforced Concrete Column under Combined Axial-Flexural Loading,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 97, No. 4, July-Aug. 2000, pp. 659-668.

3. Tan, K. H., “Strength Enhancement of Rectangular Reinforced Concrete Columns Using Fiber-Reinforced Polymer,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 6, No. 3, 2002, pp. 175-183. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:3(175)

4. Au, C., and Buyukozturk, O., “Effect of Fiber Orientation and Ply Mix on Fiber Reinforced Polymer-Confined Concrete,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 9, No. 5, 2005, pp. 397-407. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:5(397)

5. Hadi, M. N., “Behaviour of FRP Strengthened Concrete Columns under Eccentric Compression Loading,” Composite Structures, V. 77, No. 1, 2007, pp. 92-96. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.06.007

6. Piekarczyk, J.; Piekarczyk, W.; and Blazewicz, S., “Compression Strength of Concrete Cylinders Reinforced with Carbon Fiber Laminate,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 25, No. 5, 2011, pp. 2365-2369. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.035

7. Widiarsa, I. B. R., and Hadi, M. N., “Performance of CFRP Wrapped Square Reinforced Concrete Columns Subjected to Eccentric Loading,” Procedia Engineering, V. 54, 2013, pp. 365-376. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.033

8. Mostofinejad, D., and Moshiri, N., “Compressive Strength of CFRP Composites used for Strengthening of RC Columns: Comparative Evaluation of EBR and Grooving Methods,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 19, No. 5, 2015, p. 04014079. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000545

9. Mostofinejad, D., and Torabian, A., “Experimental Study of Circular RC Columns Strengthened with Longitudinal CFRP Composites under Eccentric Loading: Comparative Evaluation of EBR and EBROG Methods,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 20, No. 2, 2014, p. 04015055. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000618

10. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 520 pp.

11. Mirmira‎n, A.; Shahawy, M.; Samaan, M.; El Echary, H.; Mastrapa, J. C.; and Pico, O., “Effect of Column Parameters on FRP-Confined Concrete,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 2, No. 4, 1998, pp. 175-185. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1998)2:4(175)

12. Mirmiran, A.; Shahawy, M.; and Beitleman, T., “Slenderness Limit for Hybrid FRP-Concrete Columns,” Journal of Composites for Construction, V. 5, No. 1, 2001, pp. 26-34. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:1(26)

13. Choi, S.; Lee, M.; and Lee, S. W., “Mechanical Behavior of Slender Concrete-Filled Fiber Reinforced Polymer Columns,” Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute., V. 16, No. 4, 2004, pp. 565-572. doi: 10.4334/JKCI.2004.16.4.565

14. Tao, Z.; Teng, J. G.; Han, L.; and Lam, L., “Experimental Behaviour of FRP-Confined Slender RC Columns under Eccentric Loading,” Advanced Polymer Composites for Structural Applications in Construction, 2004, pp. 203-212.

15. Campione, G., “Influence of FRP Wrapping Techniques on the Compressive Behavior of Concrete Prisms,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 28, No. 5, 2006, pp. 497-505. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.01.002

16. Pan, J. L.; Xu, T.; and Hu, Z. J., “Experimental Investigation of Load Carrying Capacity of the Slender Reinforced Concrete Columns Wrapped with FRP,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 21, No. 11, 2007, pp. 1991-1996. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.050

17. Fitzwilliam, J., and Bisby, L. A., “Slenderness Effects on Circular CFRP Confined Reinforced Concrete Columns,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 14, No. 3, 2010, pp. 280-288. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000073

18. Chikh, N.; Mesbah, H.; Gahmous, M.; and Benzaid, R., “Performance of Externally CFRP Confined RC Columns with Changes in Thickness of the Wrap, Slenderness of the Column and Shape of the Section,” MATEC Web of Conferences, V. 2, 2012, p. 02001.

19. El-Hacha, R., and Abdelrahman, K., “Slenderness Effect of Circular Concrete Specimens Confined with SFRP Sheets,” Composites. Part B, Engineering, V. 44, No. 1, 2013, pp. 152-166. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.014

20. Gajdosova, K., and Bilcik, J., “Full-Scale Testing of CFRP-Strengthened Slender Reinforced Concrete Columns,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 17, No. 2, 2013, pp. 239-248. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000329

21. Vincent, T., and Ozbakkaloglu, T., “Influence of Slenderness on Stress-Strain Behavior of Concrete-Filled FRP Tubes: Experimental Study,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 19, No. 1, 2015, p. 04014029. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000489

22. Siddiqui, N. A.; Alsayed, S. H.; Al-Salloum, Y. A.; Iqbal, R. A.; and Abbas, H., “Experimental Investigation of Slender Circular RC Columns Strengthened with FRP Composites,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 69, 2014, pp. 323-334. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.053

23. NoroozOlyaee, M., and Mostofinejad, D., “Slenderness Effects in Circular RC Columns Strengthened with CFRP Sheets Using Different External Bonding Techniques,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 23, No. 1, 2019, p. 04018068. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000908

24. Mostofinejad, D., and Mahmoudabadi, E., “Grooving as Alternative Method of Surface Preparation to Postpone Debonding of FRP Laminates in Concrete Beams,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 14, No. 6, 2010, pp. 804-811. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000117

25. Mostofinejad, D., and Hajrasouliha, M. J., “Effect of Concrete Strength and Groove Dimension on Performance of Grooving Method to Postpone Debonding of FRP Sheets in Strengthened Concrete Beams,” Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transaction B: Engineering, V. 37, No. 2, 2013, pp. 219-232.

26. Torabian, A., and Mostofinejad, D., “Externally Bonded Reinforcement on Grooves Technique in Circular Reinforced Columns Strengthened with Longitudinal Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer under Eccentric Loading,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 114, No. 4, July-Aug. 2017, pp. 861-873. doi: 10.14359/51689567

27. Saljoughian, A., and Mostofinejad, D., “Rectangular Reinforced Concrete Columns Strengthened with Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Sheets Using Corner Strip-Batten Method,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 114, No. 3, May-June 2017, pp. 659-671. doi: 10.14359/51689566

28. Saljoughian, A., and Mostofinejad, D., “Axial-Flexural Interaction in Square RC Columns Confined by Intermittent CFRP Wraps,” Composites. Part B, Engineering, V. 89, 2016, pp. 85-95. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.10.047

29. Moshiri, N.; Hosseini, A.; and Mostofinejad, D., “Strengthening of RC Columns by Longitudinal CFRP Sheets: Effect of Strengthening Technique,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 79, 2015, pp. 318-325. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.040

30. Mostofinejad, D., and Akhlaghi, A., “Experimental Investigation of the Efficacy of EBROG Method in Seismic Rehabilitation of Deficient Reinforced Concrete Beam–Column Joints using CFRP Sheets,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 21, No. 4, 2017, p. 04016116. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000781

31. Hosseini, A., and Mostofinejad, D., “Experimental Investigation into Bond Behavior of CFRP Sheets Attached to Concrete using EBR and EBROG Techniques,” Composites. Part B, Engineering, V. 51, 2013, pp. 130-139. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.03.003

32. Amaratunga, M., “High Strength Deformed Bars for Concrete Reinforcement,” IESL, 1968.

33. Alavi-Dehkordi, S.; Mostofinejad, D.; and Alaee, P., “Effects of High-Strength Reinforcing Bars and Concrete on Seismic Behavior of RC Beam-Column Joints,” Engineering Structures, V. 183, 2019, pp. 702-719. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.019

34. Shin, K. J.; Lim, J. H.; Oh, Y. S.; and Moon, J. H., “An Experimental Study on the Flexural Behaviour of RC Beams Strengthened with High-Strength Bars,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 59, No. 7, 2007, pp. 469-481. doi: 10.1680/macr.2007.59.7.469

35. Mast, R. F.; Dawood, M.; Rizkalla, S. H.; and Zia, P., “Flexural Strength Design of Concrete Beams Reinforced with High-Strength Steel Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 105, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2008, pp. 570-577.

36. Zhong, M.; Wang, H. I.; Liu, Z. B.; and Meng, J., “Experimental Research of High-Strength Concrete Beams Reinforced by High-Strength Bars under Static Loading and Fatigue Loading,” Journal of Building Structures, V. 26, No. 2, 2005, pp. 94-100.

37. Mathey, R. G., and Watstein, D., “Investigation of Bond in Beam and Pull-Out Specimens with High-Yield-Strength Deformed Bars,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 57, No. 3, Mar. 1961, pp. 1071-1090.

38. Cusson, D., and Paultre, P., “High-Strength Concrete Columns Confined by Rectangular Ties,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 120, No. 3, 1994, pp. 783-804. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:3(783)

39. Li, B.; Park, R.; and Tanaka, H., “Stress-Strain Behavior of High-Strength Concrete Confined by Ultra-High-and Normal-Strength Transverse Reinforcements,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 98, No. 3, May-June 2001, pp. 395-406.

40. Alavi-Dehkordi, S., and Mostofinejad, D., “Behavior of Concrete Columns Reinforced with High-Strength Steel Rebars under Eccentric Loading,” Materials and Structures, V. 51, No. 6, 2018, p. 145 doi: 10.1617/s11527-018-1271-3

41. Xiao, X.; Guan, F. L.; and Yan, S., “Use of Ultra-High-Strength Bars for Seismic Performance of Rectangular High-Strength Concrete Frame Columns,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 60, No. 4, 2008, pp. 253-259. doi: 10.1680/macr.2008.60.4.253

42. Ousalem, H.; Takatsu, H.; Ishikawa, Y.; and Kimura, H., “Use of High-Strength Bars for the Seismic Performance of High-Strength Concrete Columns,” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, V. 7, No. 1, 2009, pp. 123-134. doi: 10.3151/jact.7.123

43. Todeschini, C. E.; Bianchini, A. C.; and Kesler, C. E., “Behavior of Concrete Columns Reinforced with High Strength Steels,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 61, No. 6, June 1964, pp. 701-716.

44. Rautenberg, J. M.; Pujol, S.; Tavallali, H.; and Lepage, A., “Reconsidering the Use of High-Strength Reinforcement in Concrete Columns,” Engineering Structures, V. 37, 2012, pp. 135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.12.036

45. ACI Committee 440, “Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for Strengthening Concrete Structures (ACI 440.2R-08),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2008, 76 pp.

46. JSCE, “Recommendations for Upgrading of Concrete Structures with Use of Continuous Fiber Sheets,” Concrete Engineering Series, 2001, Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Tokyo, Japan, 88 pp.

47. The Concrete Society, “Design Guidance for Strengthening Concrete Structures Using Fiber Composite Materials,” Technical Report No. 55, London, UK, 2004, 102 pp.

48. Federation International du Beton, “Externally Bonded FRP Reinforcement for RC Structures,” fib Bulletin 14, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2001, 130 pp.

49. Mostofinejad, D., and Akhlaghi, A., “Flexural Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints using Innovative Anchorage System,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 114, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2017, pp. 1603-1614. doi: 10.14359/51700953

50. ASCE 41-13, “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings.” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2013.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer