Title:
Strut-and-Tie-Based Design and Testing of Reinforced Concrete Pier Caps
Author(s):
Indu Geevar, Devdas Menon, and Meher Prasad A.
Publication:
Structural Journal
Volume:
117
Issue:
2
Appears on pages(s):
211-223
Keywords:
corbel; cracking; disturbed regions; pier cap; serviceability; shear; strut and tie
DOI:
10.14359/51721393
Date:
3/1/2020
Abstract:
This study was motivated by the observation of unexpected cracking in an actual reinforced concrete (RC) pier cap, consisting of a pair of two secondary corbels, supported on a primary corbel with the pier at its center. The pier cap was analyzed using the strut-and-tie method (STM) by considering a three-dimensional (3-D) model. Tests were carried out on two scaled-down pier cap specimens to assess safety and serviceability performance. The load-carrying capacity of the pier cap was under-predicted by approximately 75% by STM using ACI 318 and AASHTO codes. The test results presented in the paper include evolution of cracking and strains in the steel reinforcing bars, along with load-deflection plots. It was observed that concentrating reinforcing bars near the bearings resulted in an increase in strength by approximately 8.5% without adversely affecting serviceability. In summary, STM is found to provide an effective basis for the design and detailing of such complex pier caps.
Related References:
1. Schlaich, J.; Schäfer, K.; and Jennewein, M., “Toward a Consistent Design of Structural Concrete,” PCI Journal, V. 32, No. 3, 1987, pp. 74-150. doi: 10.15554/pcij.05011987.74.150
2. Geevar, I., and Menon, D., “Strength of Reinforced Concrete Pier Caps-Experimental Validation of Strut-and-Tie Method,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 116, No. 1, Jan. 2019, pp. 261-273. doi: 10.14359/51711138
3. Denio, R. J.; Yura, J. A.; and Kreger, M. E., “Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Pier Caps under Concentrated Bearing Loads,” Report No. FHWA/TX-97/1302-1, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 1995.
4. IRS Concrete Bridge Code, “Code of Practice for Plain, Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete for General Bridge Construction,” Research Designs and Standards Orgnanisation, Lucknow, India, 1997.
5. Aguilar, G.; Matamoros, A. B.; Parra-Montesinos, G.; Ramírez, J. A.; and Wight, J. K., “Experimental Evaluation of Design Procedures for Shear Strength of Deep Reinforced Concrete Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 99, No. 4, July-Aug. 2002, pp. 539-548.
6. Armstrong, S. D.; Salas, R. M.; Wood, B. A.; Breen, J. E.; and Kreger, M. E., “Behavior and Design of Large Structural Concrete Bridge Pier Overhangs,” Center for Transportation Research Report CTR-1364-1, Austin, TX, 1997.
7. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 520 pp.
8. AASHTO, “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” eighth edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2017.
9. MATLAB and Statistics Toolbox, The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, 2014.
10. Harris, H. G., and Sabnis, G., Structural Modeling and Experimental Techniques, CRC press, Washington, DC, 1999, pp. 63-67.
11. SAP 2000 v17.0, “Integrated Software for Structural Analysis and Design,” Computers & Structures, Inc., Berkeley, CA, 2014.
12. DIANA – Finite Element Analysis, “User’s Manual Release 10.2,” Diana FEA BV, Delft, the Netherlands, 2017.
13. Blévot, J. L., and Frémy, R., “Semelles sur Pieux,” Institute Technique du Bâtiment et des Travaux Publics, V. 20, No. 230, 1967, pp. 223-295.
14. Birrcher, D.; Tuchscherer, R.; Huizinga, M.; Bayrak, O.; Wood, S. L.; and Jirsa, J. O., “Strength and Serviceability Design of Reinforced Concrete Deep Beams,” Technical Report No. FHWA/TX-09/0-5253-1, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 2009, 222 pp.