Title:
Shear Design Method of Eurasia for Concrete Members
Author(s):
Meirzhan Yerzhanov and Deuckhang Lee
Publication:
Structural Journal
Volume:
117
Issue:
3
Appears on pages(s):
207-222
Keywords:
design; shear; simplification; SNiP code; verification
DOI:
10.14359/51721371
Date:
5/1/2020
Abstract:
Russian SNiP code is dominantly adopted to design concrete structures through the so-called Eurasia countries. However, there has been no significant modification and update due to complex political and industrial situations in this region for the past several decades. In addition, it is very hard to trace back the origin and design philosophy of the shear design method specified in SNiP code
due to limited access to important documents hidden in different engineering practices and industrial barriers. This study therefore addresses the exact background of the shear design method in SNiP code, and its accuracy and applicability were examined in detail by using the currently available shear databases for reinforced and prestressed concrete beam members. On this basis, the key influencing parameters of shear strengths in concrete members were identified, and the complex design procedures in the current SNiP code were modified to secure a reasonable safety level and better applicability.
Related References:
1. SP 63.13330, “Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Structures. Design Requirements,” Ministry of Regional Development of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia, 2012, 162 pp.
2. United Nation (UN), Annex No. 9 to the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union Protocol on Technical Regulation within the Eurasian Economic Unions, 2011, 855 pp.
3. fib, “The fib in Russia: New Standards,” Structural Concrete, V. 16, No. 1, 2015, pp. 149-150.
4. Tatygulov, A. S.; Akberdin, T. Z.; Okonechnikov, V.; and Makhambetov, M. S., “Report for Project Academy,” Kazgor, 2010, 211 pp. (in Russian)
5. SNIP 2.03.01-84, “Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Structures,” Gosstroy USSR, Moscow, USSR, 1985, 79 pp.
6. Sozen, M. A., and Hawkins, N. M., “Discussion of Report of ACI-ASCE Committee 326, Shear and Diagonal Tension,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 59, No. 9, Sept. 1962, pp. 1341-1347.
7. Tureyen, A. K., and Frosch, R. J., “Concrete Shear Strength: Another Perspective,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 100, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2003, pp. 609-615.
8. Reineck, K.-H., “Shear Design Based on Truss Models with Crack-Friction,” A State-of-the-Art Report by CEB Task Group 2.3, CEB-Bulletin No. 223, 1995, pp. 137-157.
9. JointACI-ASCE Committee 445. “Recent Approaches to Shear Design of Structural Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 124, No. 12, 1999, pp. 1375-1417.
10. Sedova, L. I.; Lavrentiva, M. A.; Mikhailova, G. K.; Muskhelishvili, N. I.; and Chernov, G. G., Mechanics in USSR for 50 Years, Nauka, Moscow, USSR, 1972, 61 pp.
11. Karpenko, S. N., “The Strength Criteria for Reinforced Concrete Structures on Inclined Shear Cracks,” Academia: Architecture and Construction, V. 2, 2006, pp. 54-59. (in Russian)
12. Filatov, V. B., and Blinkova, E. V., “Design Model of the Inclined Section of the Bending Reinforced Concrete Element without Transverse Reinforcement,” Izestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo centra Rossiyskoi akademiy nauk, V. 15, No. 6, 2013, pp. 517-519. (in Russian)
13. Meirzhan, Y.; Ju, H.; Zhang, D.; Moon, S. W.; Kim, J. R.; and Lee, D. H., “Shear Strength Model of Reinforced Concrete Beams without Stirrup Used in the CIS Countries,” Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance, V. 4, No. 1, 2019, pp. 15-25. doi: 10.1080/24705314.2019.1565056
14. Placas, A., “Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Beams,” PhD dissertation, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London, UK, 1969.
15. Gvozdev, A. A., Concrete and Reinforced Concrete, Moscow, Russia, 1975, pp. 44-45. (in Russian)
16. Zalesov, A. S., Calculation and Designing of RC Construction, Moscow, Russia, 1977, pp. 16-28. (in Russian)
17. Reineck, K.-H.; Bentz, E. C.; Fitik, B.; Kuchma, D. A.; and Bayrak, O., “ACI-DAfStb Database of Shear Tests on Slender Reinforced Concrete Beams without Stirrups,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 110, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2013, pp. 867-875.
18. Reineck, K.-H.; Bentz, E.; Fitik, B.; Kuchma, D. A.; and Bayrak, O., “ACI-DAfStb Databases for Shear Tests on Slender Reinforced Concrete Beams with Stirrups,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 111, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2014, pp. 1147-1156. doi: 10.14359/51686819
19. Dunkelberg, D.; Sneed, L. H.; Zilch, K.; and Reineck, K.-H., “The 2015 ACI-DAfStb Database of Shear Tests on Slender Prestressed Concrete Beams without Stirrups—Overview and Evaluation of Current Design Approaches,” Structural Concrete, V. 19, No. 6, 2018, pp. 1740-1759. doi: 10.1002/suco.201700216
20. Kim, K. S., “Shear Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beams and Prestressed Concrete Beams,” PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 2004.
21. Zelesov, A., and Klimov, Y., Shear Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Members, Kiev, Budivelnik, 1989, 107 pp.
22. Lee, D. H.; Han, S. J.; and Kim, K. S., “Dual Potential Capacity Model for RC Beams Subjected to Shear,” Structural Concrete, V. 17, No. 3, 2016, pp. 443-456. doi: 10.1002/suco.201500165
23. Choi, K. K.; Park, H. G.; and Wight, J. K., “Unified Shear Strength Model for Reinforced Concrete Beams Part I: Development,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 104, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2017, pp. 142-152.
24. Lee, D. H.; Han, S. J.; and Kim, K. S., “Simplification and Verification of Dual Potential Capacity Model for Reinforced Concrete Beams Subjected to Shear,” Structural Concrete, V. 18, No. 2, 2017, pp. 278-291. doi: 10.1002/suco.201600104
25. Lee, D. H.; Han, S. J.; Kim, K. S.; and LaFave, J. M., “Shear Capacity of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Structural Concrete, V. 18, No. 2, 2017, pp. 278-291. doi: 10.1002/suco.201600104
26. Collins, M., and Mitchell, D., Prestressed Concrete Structures, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991, 736 pp.
27. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 524 pp.
28. CEN, “Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures, Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2004, 225 pp.
29. CSA A23.3, “Design of Concrete Structures,” Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga, ON, Canada, 2004, 214 pp.
30. Collins, M. P., and Kuchma, D., “How Safe Are Our Large, Lightly Reinforced Concrete Beams, Slabs and Footings?” ACI Structural Journal, V. 96, No. 4, July-Aug. 1999, pp. 482-490.
31. Sherwood, E.; Bentz, E. C.; and Collins, M. P., “Effect of Aggregate Size on Beam-Shear Strength of Thick Slabs,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 104, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2007, pp. 180-190.