Title:
Statistical Optimization of Ultra-High-Performance Glass Concrete
Author(s):
Joaquín Abellán, Jaime Fernández, Nancy Torres, and Andrés Núñez
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
117
Issue:
1
Appears on pages(s):
243-254
Keywords:
compressive strength; optimization; recycled glass concrete; response surface methodology (RSM); sustainability; ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC)
DOI:
10.14359/51720292
Date:
1/1/2020
Abstract:
This paper presents the experimental results of research carried out involving the compressive strength and slump flow of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) made with cementitious blends of recycled glass flour, recycled glass powder, micro limestone powder, silica fume, and portland cement. The adopted second-order polynomic regression model provided an accurate correlation between the considered variables and the obtained responses. A numerical optimization was then performed to obtain an eco-friendly mixture with the proper flow, highest compressive strength, and minimum content of cement. The use of 603 kg/m3 of cement in the mixture can be considered as the most appropriate amount to be employed in UHPC mixtures, fulfilling the limit values of compressive strength and spread flow.
Related References:
1. Soliman, N. A., and Tagnit-Hamou, A., “Partial Substitution of Silica Fume with Fine Glass Powder in UHPC: Filling the Micro Gap,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 139, 2017, pp. 374-383. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.084
2. Ghafari, E.; Costa, H.; and Júlio, E., “RSM-Based Model to Predict the Performance of Self-Compacting UHPC Reinforced with Hybrid Steel Micro-Fibers,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 66, 2014, pp. 375-383. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.064
3. Schmidt, C., and Schmidt, M., “Whitetopping of Asphalt and Concrete Pavements with Thin Layers of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete - Construction and Economic Efficiency,” Proceedings of Hipermat 2012 - 3rd International Symposium on UHPC and Nanotechnology for Construction Materials, Kassel, Germany, 2012, pp. 921-928.
4. Abbas, S.; Nehdi, M.; and Saleem, M. A., “Ultra-High Performance Concrete: Mechanical Performance, Durability, Sustainability and Implementation Challenges,” International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, V. 10, No. 3, 2016, pp. 271-295. doi: 10.1007/s40069-016-0157-4
5. Soliman, N. A., and Tagnit-Hamou, A., “Using Particle Packing and Statistical Approach to Optimize Eco-Efficient Ultra-High-Performance Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 114, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2017, pp. 847-858. doi: 10.14359/51701001
6. Jammes, F.-X.; Cespedes, X.; and Resplendino, J., “Design of Offshore Wind Turbines,” RILEM-Fib-AFGC Int. Symposium on Ultra-High Performance Fibre-Reinforced Concrete UHPFRC 2013, 2013, pp. 443-452.
7. Tagnit-Hamou, A.; Soliman, N. A.; and Omran, A., “Green Ultra-High-Performance Glass Concrete,” First International Interactive Symposium on UHPC, Des Moines, IA, July 18-20, 2016, 10 pp.
8. Richard, P., and Cheyrezy, M., “Composition of Reactive Powder Concretes,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 25, No. 7, 1995, pp. 1501-1511. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00144-2
9. De Larrard, F., and Sedran, T., “Mixture-Proportioning of High-Performance Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 32, No. 11, pp. 2002, pp. 1699-1704. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00861-X10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00861-X
10. Kou, S. C., and Xing, F., “The Effect of Recycled Glass Powder and Reject Fly Ash on the Mechanical Properties of Fibre-Reinforced Ultrahigh Performance Concrete,” Advances in Matererials Science and Engineering, V. 2012, 2012, 8 pp. doi: 10.1155/2012/26324310.1155/2012/263243
11. Soliman, N. A., and Tagnit-Hamou, A., “Using Glass Sand as an Alternative for Quartz Sand in UHPC,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 145, 2017, pp. 243-252. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.187
12. Kalny, M.; Kvasnicka, V.; and Komanec, J., “First Practical Applications of UHPC in the Czech Republic,” Proceedings of Hipermat 2016 - 4th International Symposium on UHPC and Nanotechnology for Construction Materials, E. Fehling, B. Middendorf, and J. Thiemicke, eds., Kassel, Germany, 2016, pp. 147-148.
13. Sayed Ahmad, M., and Sennah, K., “Development of Ultra-High Performance Concrete Jointed Precast Decks and Concrete Piles in Integral Abutment Bridges,” The First International Symposium on Jointless & Sustainable Bridges, Fuzhou, Fujian, China, 2016.
14. Haber, Z. B.; Munoz, J. F.; and Graybeal, B. A., “Field Testing of an Ultra-High Performance Concrete Overlay,” FHWA-HRT-17-096, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA, 2017, 57 pp.
15. Acker, P., and Behloul, M., “Ductal Technology: A Large Spectrum of Properties, a Wide Range of Applications,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Ultra High Performance Concrete, Kassel University, Kassel, Germany, 2004.
16. Russell, E.; Lee, J.; and Clift, R., “Can the SDGs Provide a Basis for Supply Chain Decisions in the Construction Sector?” Sustainability, V. 10, No. 3, 2018, 19 pp. doi: 10.3390/su1003062910.3390/su10030629
17. Ferdosian, I.; Camões, A.; and Ribeiro, M., “High-Volume Fly Ash Paste for Developing Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC),” Ciência e Tecnologia dos Materiais, V. 29, No. 1, 2017, pp. e157-e161. doi: 10.1016/j.ctmat.2016.10.001
18. Ghafari, E.; Costa, H.; and Júlio, E., “Statistical Mixture Design Approach for Eco- Efficient UHPC,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 55, 2015, pp. 17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.07.016
19. Meng, W.; Samaranayake, V. A.; and Khayat, K. H., “Factorial Design and Optimization of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete with Lightweight Sand,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 115, No. 1, Jan. 2018, pp. 129-138. doi: 10.14359/51700995
20. Li, W.; Huang, Z.; Zu, T.; Shi, C.; Duan, W. H.; and Shah, S. P., “Influence of Nanolimestone on the Hydration, Mechanical Strength, and Autogenous Shrinkage of Ultrahigh-Performance Concrete,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 28, No. 1, 2016, pp. 1-9. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001327
21. Huang, Z., and Cao, F., “Effects of Nano-Materials on the Performance of UHPC,” Materials Review, V. 26, No. 9, 2012, pp. 136-141.
22. Yu, R.; Tang, P.; Spiesz, P.; and Brouwers, H. J. H., “A Study of Multiple Effects of Nano-Silica and Hybrid Fibres on the Properties of Ultra-High Performance Fibre Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC) Incorporating Waste Bottom Ash (WBA),” Construction and Building Materials, V. 60, 2014, pp. 98-110. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.059
23. Vaitkevičius, V.; Šerelis, E.; and Hilbig, H., “The Effect of Glass Powder on the Microstructure of Ultra High Performance Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 68, 2014, pp. 102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.101
24. Funk, J. E., and Dinger, D., Predictive Process Control of Crowded Particulate Suspensions: Applied to Ceramic Manufacturing, Springer Science+Business Media, New York, 1994, 786 pp.
25. Eriksson, L.; Johansson, E.; Kettaneh-Wold, N.; Wikström, C.; and Wold, S., Design of Experiments: Principles and Applications, Umetrics AB, Umeå, Sweden, 2000, 425 pp.
26. Upasani, R. S., and Banga, A. K., “Response Surface Methodology to Investigate the Iontophoretic Delivery of Tacrine Hydrochloride,” Pharmaceutical Research, V. 21, No. 12, 2004, pp. 2293-2299. doi: 10.1007/s11095-004-7682-6
27. Lenth, R. V., “Response-Surface Methods in R, Using RSM,” Journal of Statistical Software, V. 32, No. 7, 2012, pp. 1-17. doi: 10.18637/jss.v032.i07
28. Montgomery, D. C., Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, 2005.
29. Mosaberpanah, M. A., and Eren, O., “Statistical Models for Mechanical Properties of UHPC Using Response Surface Methodology,” Computers and Concrete, V. 19, No. 6, 2017, pp. 667-675. doi: 10.12989/cac.2017.19.6.667
30. Mosaberpanah, M. A., and Eren, O., “Effect of Quartz Powder, Quartz Sand and Water Curing Regimes on Mechanical Properties of UHPC Using Response Surface Modeling,” Advances in Concrete Construction, V. 5, No. 5, 2017, pp. 481-492. doi: 10.12989/acc.2017.5.5.481
31. Sayed Ahmed, M. S.; Sennah, K.; and Monsif, M. Y., “Mechanical Behaviour of Ultra-High Performance Concrete Obtained with Different Concrete Constituents and Mix Designs,” Resilient Infrastructure, London, UK, 2016, 10 pp.
32. Van, V. T. A., and Ludwig, H.-M., “Proportioning Optimization of UHPC Containing Rice Husk Ash and Ground Granulated Blast-furnace Slag,” Proceedings of Hipermat 2012 - 3rd International Symposium on UHPC and Nanotechnology for Construction Materials. Kassel University, Kassel, Germany, 2012, pp. 197-205.
33. Abellan, J.; Torres, N.; Núñez, A.; and Fernández, J., “Influencia del Exponente de Fuller, la Relación Agua Conglomerante y el Contenido en Policarboxilato en Concretos de Muy Altas Prestaciones,” IV Congreso Internacional de Ingenieria Civil. Havana, Cuba, 2018.
34. Ghafari, E.; Costa, H.; and Júlio, E., “Critical Review on Eco-Efficient Ultra High Performance Concrete Enhanced with Nano- Materials,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 101, 2015, pp. 201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.066
35. Kumar, R., and Tiwari, O. P., “Experimental Investigation of Mechanical Characterization and Drilling of Fabricated GFRP Composites Reinforced with Al2O3 Micro Particles,” International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations Technology, V. 4, No. 4, 2018, pp. 191-199.
36. ASTM C1437-13, “Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, 2 pp.
37. ASTM C109/C109M-11b, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [ 50-mm ] Cube Specimens),” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011, 10 pp.
38. R Core Team, “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing,” Vienna, Austria, 2018, www.r-project.org. (last accessed Dec. 13, 2019)
39. The European Project Group, “The European Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete,” 2005, 63 pp.
40. Pedrajas, C.; Rahhal, V.; and Talero, R., “Determination of Characteristic Rheological Parameters in Portland Cement Pastes,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 51, 2014, pp. 484-491. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.004
41. Puertas, F.; Santos, H.; Palacios, M.; and Martínez-Ramírez, S., “Polycarboxylate Superplasticiser Admixtures: Effect on Hydration, Microstructure and Rheological Behaviour in Cement Pastes,” Advances in Cement Research, V. 17, No. 2, 2005, pp. 77-89. doi: 10.1680/adcr.2005.17.2.77
42. Kubens, S., Interaction of Cement and Admixtures and Its Influence on Rheological Properties, Cuvillier Verlag, Göttingen, Germany, 2010.
43. Derringer, G., and Suich, R., “Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables,” Journal of Quality Technology, V. 12, No. 4, 1980, pp. 214-219. doi: 10.1080/00224065.1980.11980968