Predicting Chloride Testing Outcome of Different Cementitious Systems

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Predicting Chloride Testing Outcome of Different Cementitious Systems

Author(s): Naga Pavan Vaddey, Mahmoud Shakouri, and David Trejo

Publication: Materials Journal

Volume: 117

Issue: 1

Appears on pages(s): 139-151

Keywords: acid-soluble chloride; water-soluble chloride; water to acidsoluble chloride ratio

DOI: 10.14359/51719149

Date: 1/1/2020

Abstract:
The American Concrete Institute (ACI) specifies allowable admixed chloride limit (Climit) values to minimize the corrosion risk of steel reinforcement in concrete. The chloride concentration of concrete for new construction must not exceed this Climit value. While most ACI documents require the ASTM C1218 (watersoluble) test standard to measure chlorides, some documents allow the ASTM C1152 (acid-soluble) test standard. ACI documents that require ASTM C1218 report the same Climit value for different cementitious systems. Different cementitious systems, with similar chloride concentrations, could have different ASTM C1218 test outcomes due to differences in chloride binding capacities. This paper develops models to predict ASTM C1218 test outcomes. These models can assist in choosing appropriate concrete mixtures that can meet ACI Climit values. This paper also reports models to predict the ratio of ASTM C1218 and ASTM C1152 test outcomes to better correlate Climit values in ACI 222R, which allows both test methods.

Related References:

ACI Committee 222, 2010, “Protection of Metals in Concrete Against Corrosion (ACI 222R-01(10)),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2010, 41 pp.

ACI Committee 318, 2014, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 520 pp.

ACI Committee 350, 2008, “Code Requirements for Environmental Engineering Concrete Structures (ACI 350-06) and Commentary,” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 485 pp.

ASTM C1152/C1152M-04(2012), 2012, “Standard Test Method for Acid- Soluble Chloride in Mortar and Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 4 pp.

ASTM C1218/C1218M, 2015, “Standard Test Method for Water-Soluble Chloride in Mortar and Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 3 pp.

Clear, K. C., 1976, “Time-to-Corrosion of Reinforcing Steel in Concrete Slabs, Volume 3: Performance after 830 Daily Salt Applications,” Report No. FHWA-RD-76-70, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 64 pp.

Cook, R., and Hover, K. C., 1999, “Mercury Porosimetry of Hardened Cement Pastes,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 29, No. 6, pp. 933-943. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00083-6

Enevoldsen, J.; Hansson, C.; and Hope, B., 1994, “Binding of Chloride in Mortar Containing Admixed or Penetrated Chlorides,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 24, No. 8, pp. 1525-1533. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(94)90167-8

Florea, M. V. A., and Brouwers, H. J. H., 2012, “Chloride Binding Related to Hydration Products: Part I: Ordinary Portland Cement,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 42, No. 2, pp. 282-290. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.09.016

Hosmer, D. W.; Jovanovic, B.; and Lemeshow, S., 1989, “Best Subsets Logistic Regression,” Biometrics, V. 45, No. 4, pp. 1265-1270. doi: 10.2307/2531779

Lee, K. M.; Jung, S. H.; and Hwan, B., 2013, “Effects of Carbonation on Chloride Penetration in Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 110, No. 5, Sept.-Oct., pp. 559-566.

Mohammed, T., and Hamada, H., 2003, “Relationship between Free Chloride and Total Chloride Contents in Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 33, No. 9, pp. 1487-1490. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00065-6

Neter, J.; Kutner, M. H.; Nachtsheim, C. J.; and Wasserman, W., 2013, Applied Linear Statistical Models, fifth edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Osborne, J. W., 2010, “Improving your Data Transformations: Applying the Box-Cox Transformation,” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, V. 24, No. 12, pp. 1-9.

Rasheeduzzafar, E.; Ehtesham Hussain, S.; and Al-Saadoun, S. S., 1991, “Effect of Cement Composition on Chloride Binding and Corrosion of Reinforcing Steel in Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 21, No. 5, pp. 777-794. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(91)90173-F

Ryan, B. F., and Joiner, B. L., 2001, Minitab Handbook, Duxbury Press, Independence, KY.

Trejo, D.; Isgor, O. B.; and Weiss, W. J., 2016, “The Allowable Admixed Chloride Conundrum,” Concrete International, V. 38, No. 5, May, pp. 35-42.

Trejo, D.; Shakouri, M.; Vaddey, N. P.; and Isgor, O. B., 11, 2018, “Development of Empirical Models for Chloride Binding in Cementitious Systems Containing Admixed Chlorides,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 189, pp. 157-169. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.197

Trejo, D.; Vaddey, N.; and Shakouri, M., 2019, “Factors Influencing Chloride Test Results of Cementitious Systems,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 116, No. 1, Jan., pp. 135-145. doi: 10.14359/51712240

Vaddey, N., and Trejo, D., 2018, “Influence of Concrete Mixture Parameters on Chloride Test Measurements,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 30, No. 8, p. 04018188 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002364


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Materials Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer