Precast Seismic Bridge Column Connection Using Ultra- High-Performance Concrete Lap Splice

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Precast Seismic Bridge Column Connection Using Ultra- High-Performance Concrete Lap Splice

Author(s): Titchenda Chan, Kevin R. Mackie, and Zachary B. Haber

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 117

Issue: 1

Appears on pages(s): 217-229

Keywords: accelerated bridge construction; bond slip; ductility; highstrength steel; lap splice; shifted plastic hinge

DOI: 10.14359/51718021

Date: 1/1/2020

Abstract:
In high seismic regions, prefabricated columns have seen limited applications because the connections generally coincide with the plastic hinge (PH) region, where major damage occurs. This paper proposes a simple and damage-tolerant precast column connection for use in medium and high seismic regions that uses ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC). The connection laps the longitudinal reinforcement from precast column with footing dowel bars using a short splice length, a practical reinforcing bar cover, and no shear reinforcement within the connection region. High-strength bars were used as the footing dowels to shift PH formation above the connection region to prevent footing damage due to inelastic strain penetration, and ensure the target lateral load and displacement ductility capacity. The connection was investigated experimentally by testing two 0.42-scale precast columns (flexural and flexural-shear) under reversed cyclic loading. Responses of the precast columns were compared with two reference cast-in-place (CIP) columns. Results indicate that the proposed connection performed well in shear, developed the column longitudinal bars, shifted PH formation above the UHPC region, and exhibited similar or improved lateral capacity and ductility compared with the CIP columns.

Related References:

1. Restrepo, J. I.; Tobolski, M. J.; and Matsumoto, E. E., “Development of a Precast Bent Cap System for Seismic Regions,” NCHRP Report No. 681, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2011, 106 pp.

2. Tazarv, M., and Saiidi, M. S., “Design and Construction of Precast Bent Caps with Pocket Connections for High Seismic Regions,” Report No. CCEER-15-06, Center for Civil Engineering Earthquake Research, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, 2015.

3. Haraldsson, O.; Janes, T.; Eberhard, M.; and Stanton, J., “Seismic Resistance of Socket Connection between Footing and Precast Column,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 18, No. 9, 2013, pp. 910-919. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000413

4. Haber, Z. B.; Saiidi, M. S.; and Sanders, D. H., “Seismic Performance of Precast Columns with Mechanically Spliced Column-Footing Connections,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 111, No. 3, May-June 2014, pp. 639-650. doi: 10.14359/51686624

5. Ameli, M.; Parks, J. E.; Brown, D. N.; and Pantelides, C. P., “Seismic Evaluation of Grouted Splice Sleeve Connections for Reinforced Precast Concrete Column-to-Cap Beam Joints in Accelerated Bridge Construction,” PCI Journal, V. 60, No. 2, 2015, pp. 80-103. doi: 10.15554/pcij.03012015.80.103

6. Ameli, M. J.; Brown, D. N.; Parks, J. E.; and Pantelides, C. P., “Seismic Column-to-Footing Connections Using Grouted Splice Sleeves,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 113, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2016, pp. 1021-1030. doi: 10.14359/51688755

7. Tazarv, M., “Next Generation of Bridge Columns for Accelerated Bridge Construction in High Seismic Zones,” PhD thesis, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, 2014, 400 pp.

8. Haber, Z. B.; Mackie, K. R.; and Al-Jelawy, H. M., “Testing and Analysis of Precast Columns with Grouted Sleeve Connections and Shifted Plastic Hinging,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 22, No. 10, 2017, p. 04017078 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001105

9. ACI Committee 239, “Ultra-High-Performance Concrete: An Emerging Technology Report (ACI 239R-18),” American Concrete Institute, Famington Hills, MI, 2018, 21 pp.

10. Yuan, J., and Graybeal, B. A., “Bond Behavior of Reinforcing Steel in Ultra-High Performance Concrete,” FHWA-HRT-14-089, McLean, VA, 2014.

11. Russell, H. G., and Graybeal, B. A., “Ultra-High Performance Concrete: A State-of-the-Art Report for the Bridge Community,” Report No. FHWA-HRT-13-060, FHWA, Washington, DC, 2013.

12. Dagenais, M. A.; Massicotte, B.; and Boucher-Proulx, G., “Seismic Retrofitting of Rectangular Bridge Piers with Deficient Lap Splices Using Ultrahigh-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 23, No. 2, 2018, p. 04017129 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001173

13. Tazarv, M., and Saiidi, M. S., “Low-Damage Precast Columns for Accelerated Bridge Construction in High Seismic Zones,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 21, No. 3, 2016, p. 04015056 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000806

14. Tazarv, M., and Saiidi, M. S., “UHPC-Filled Duct Connections for Accelerated Bridge Construction of RC Columns in High Seismic Zones,” Engineering Structures, V. 99, No. 3, 2015, pp. 413-422. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.05.018

15. Zohrevand, P., and Mirmiran, A., “Cyclic Behavior of Hybrid Columns Made of Ultra High-Performance Concrete and Fiber Reinforced Polymers,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 16, No. 1, 2012, pp. 91-99. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000234

16. Ichikawa, S.; Matsuzaki, H.; Moustafa, A.; ElGawady, M.; and Kawashima, K., “Seismic-Resistant Bridge Columns with Ultrahigh-Performance Concrete Segments,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 21, No. 9, 2016, p. 04016049 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000898

17. Al-Jelawy, H. M.; Mackie, K. R.; and Haber, Z. B., “Shifted Plastic Hinging for Grouted Sleeve Column Connections,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 115, No. 4, July 2018, pp. 1101-1114. doi: 10.14359/51702233

18. Caltrans, S. D. C., “Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria Version 1.7,” California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA, 2013.

19. ASTM C39/C39M-15a, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, 4 pp.

20. King Packaged Materials Company, “UP-FX Poly Technical Data Sheet,” http://www.kpmindustries.com/KingConstructionProducts/product/up-f2-poly-concrete, 2018.

21. ASTM C1856/C1856M-17, “Standard Practice for Fabricating and Testing Specimens of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, 8 pp.

22. ASTM C1609/C1609M-06, “Standard Test Method for Flexural Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (Using Beam with Third-Point Loading),” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2006, 8 pp.

23. Zhou, Z., and Qiao, P., “Direct Tension Test for Characterization of Tensile Behavior of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, V. 48, No. 4, 2018, pp. 1-20.

24. Graybeal, B. A., and Baby, F., “Development of Direct Tension Test Method for Ultra-High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 110, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2013, pp. 177-186.

25. ASTM A615/A615M-16, “Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 8 pp.

26. ASTM A1064/A1064M-17, “Standard Specification for Carbon-steel Wire and Welded Wire Reinforcement, Plain and Deformed, for Concrete,” West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, 11 pp.

27. ASTM A1035/A1035M- 16b, “Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain, Low-Carbon, Chromium, Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 8 pp.

28. ASTM A370-17a, “Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, 50 pp.

29. Priestley, M. J. N.; Seible, F.; and Calvi, G. M., Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1996.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer