Title:
Role of Nanosilica on the Early-Age Performance of Natural Pozzolan-Based Blended Cement
Author(s):
Gürkan Yıldırım, Burak Dündar, Burhan Alam, Ismail Özgür Yaman, and Mustafa Sahmaran
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
115
Issue:
6
Appears on pages(s):
969-980
Keywords:
hydration characteristics; mechanical properties; nanosilica; pumice powder; workability
DOI:
10.14359/51706848
Date:
11/1/2018
Abstract:
This investigation focused on the microstructural, workability, mechanical, and hydration evolution of blended cements composed of natural pozzolan with nanosilica (NS). In Turkey, the most common supplementary cementitious materials are natural pozzolans of volcanic origin. Volcanic pumice is a natural pozzolan produced by the release of gases during the cooling and solidification of lava. In this study, pumice powders with two different levels of fineness were used to replace ordinary portland cement (OPC) at 15%, 30%, and 45% by weight. Seven mixtures were proposed with different levels of pumice fineness and OPC replacement rates, as well as an additional control mixture without pumice powder. Companion mixtures were also produced by adding 3% NS (by total weight of cementitious materials) into the proposed mixtures for a total of 14 different mixtures. Fresh properties measured by flow test and mechanical performance validated by microstructural analyses show that in the presence of NS, up to 30% pumice powder can be replaced with OPC without risking workability and 2-day strength measurements. In cases where the early-age strength is necessary after the first 7 days, the same level of replacement can be increased up to 45%. The successful outcomes of this study may compensate for the drawbacks of OPC use in concrete mixtures and popularize the use of natural pozzolans in locations where they are more commonly available.
Related References:
1. Pacheco-Torgal, F., and Jalali, S., “Reusing Ceramic Wastes in Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 24, No. 5, 2010, pp. 832-838. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.10.023
2. Gartner, E., “Industrially Interesting Approaches to Low-CO2 Cements,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 34, No. 9, 2004, pp. 1489-1498. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.01.021
3. Scrivener, K. L., and Kirkpatrick, R. J., “Innovation in Use and Research on Cementitious Material,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 38, No. 2, 2008, pp. 128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.025
4. Al-Ani, M., and Hughes, B., “Pulverized-Fuel Ash and Its Uses in Concrete,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 41, No. 147, 1989, pp. 55-63.
5. Mehta, P. K., “Properties of Blended Cements Made from Rice Husk Ash,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 74, No. 9, Sept. 1979, pp. 440-442.
6. Swamy, R. N., New Concrete Materials, Concrete Technology and Design, Surrey University Press, Great Britain, 1983, 220 pp.
7. Swamy, R. N., Cement Replacement Materials, Concrete Technology and Design, Surrey University Press, Great Britain, 1986, 200 pp.
8. Berry, E. E., and Malhotra, V. M., “Fly Ash for Use in Concrete—A Critical Review,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 77, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1980, pp. 59-73.
9. Mehta, P. K., and Monteiro, P. J. M., Concrete Microstructure, Properties and Materials, third edition, McGraw Hill, New York, 2006, 659 pp.
10. Siddique, R., “Performance Characteristics of High Volume Class F Fly Ash Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 34, No. 3, 2004, pp. 487-493. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.09.002
11. Kawashima, S.; Hou, P.; Corr, D. J.; and Shah, S. P., “Modification of Cement Based Materials with Nanoparticles,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 36, 2013, pp. 8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.06.012
12. Li, H.; Xiao, H.; Yuan, J.; and Ou, J., “Microstructure of Cement Mortar with Nano-Particles,” Composites. Part B, Engineering, V. 35, No. 2, 2004, pp. 185-189. doi: 10.1016/S1359-8368(03)00052-0
13. Zhang, M. H., and Islam, J., “Use of Nano-Silica to Reduce Setting Time and Increase Early Strength of Concretes with High Volume Fly Ash or Slag,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 29, 2012, pp. 573-580. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.013
14. Jo, B. W.; Kim, C. H.; and Lim, J. H., “Characteristics of Cement Mortar with Nano-Silica Particles,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 104, No. 4, July-Aug. 2007, pp. 404-407.
15. Shaikh, F. U. A.; Supit, S. W. M.; and Sarker, P. K., “A Study on the Effect of Nano Silica on Compressive Strength of High Volume Fly Ash Mortars and Concretes,” Materials and Design, V. 60, 2014, pp. 433-442. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.025
16. Yeşilmen, S.; Al-Najjar, Y.; Balav, M. H.; Şahmaran, M.; Yıldırım, G.; and Lachemi, M., “Nano-Modification to Improve the Ductility of Cementitious Composites,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 76, 2015, pp. 170-179. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.05.026
17. Al-Najjar, Y.; Yeşilmen, S.; Al-Dahawi, A. M.; Şahmaran, M.; Yıldırım, G.; Lachemi, M.; and Amleh, L., “Physical and Chemical Actions of Nano-Mineral Additives on Properties of High-Volume Fly Ash Engineered Cementitious Composites,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 113, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2016, pp. 791-801. doi: 10.14359/51689114
18. Hossain, K. M. A., “Blended Cement Using Volcanic Ash and Pumice,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 33, No. 10, 2003, pp. 1601-1605. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00127-3
19. Hossain, K. M. A., “Properties of Volcanic Pumice Based Cement and Lightweight Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 34, No. 2, 2004, pp. 283-291. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.08.004
20. Hossain, K. M. A., “Volcanic Ash and Pumice as Cement Additives: Pozzolanic, Alkali-Silica Reaction and Autoclave Expansion Characteristics,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 35, No. 6, 2005, pp. 1141-1144. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.025
21. Kabay, N.; Tüfekçi, M. M.; Kızılkanat, A. B.; and Oktay, D., “Properties of Concrete with Pumice Powder and Fly Ash as Cement Replacement Materials,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 85, 2015, pp. 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.026
22. Kurt, M.; Gül, M. S.; Gül, R.; Aydın, A. C.; and Kotan, T., “The Effect of Pumice Powder on the Self-Compactability of Pumice Aggregate Lightweight Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 103, 2016, pp. 36-46. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.11.043
23. Zhang, M. H., and Gjørv, O. E., “Effect of Silica Fume on Cement Hydration in Low Porosity Cement Pastes,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 21, No. 5, 1991, pp. 800-808. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(91)90175-H
24. Zhang, M. H., and Islam, J., “Use of Nano-Silica to Reduce Setting Time and Increase Early Strength of Concretes with High Volume Fly Ash or Slag,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 29, 2012, pp. 573-580. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.013
25. Granata, M. F., “Pumice Powder as Filler of Self-Compacting Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 96, 2015, pp. 581-590. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.040
26. Şahmaran, M.; Yıldırım, G.; and Erdem, T. K., “Self-Healing Capability of Cementitious Composites Incorporating Different Supplementary Cementitious Materials,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 35, No. 1, 2013, pp. 89-101. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.08.013
27. Land, G., and Stephan, D., “The Influence of Nano-Silica on the Hydration of Ordinary Portland Cement,” Journal of Materials Science, V. 47, No. 2, 2012, pp. 1011-1017. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5881-1
28. Hou, P.; Kawashima, S.; Kong, D.; Corr, D. J.; Qian, J.; and Shah, S. P., “Modification Effects of Colloidal NanoSiO2 on Cement Hydration and Its Gel Property,” Composites. Part B, Engineering, V. 45, No. 1, 2013, pp. 440-448. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.056
29. Scrivener, K. L., and Nonat, A., “Hydration of Cementitious Materials, Present and Future,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 41, No. 7, 2011, pp. 651-665. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.026
30. Morsy, M. S., “Effect of Temperature on Electrical Conductivity of Blended Cement Pastes,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 29, No. 4, 1999, pp. 603-606. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00198-7
31. Thomas, J. J.; Jennings, H. M.; and Chen, J. J., “Influence of Nucleation Seeding on the Hydration Mechanisms of Tricalcium Silicate and Cement,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, V. 113, No. 11, 2009, pp. 4327-4334. doi: 10.1021/jp809811w
32. Alizadeh, R.; Raki, L.; Makar, J. M.; Beaudoin, J. J.; and Moudrakovski, I., “Hydration of Tricalcium Silicate in the Presence of Synthetic Calcium–Silicate–Hydrate,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, V. 19, No. 42, 2009, pp. 7937-7946. doi: 10.1039/b910216g
33. Ward, C. R., and French, D., “Determination of Glass Content and Estimation of Glass Composition in Fly Ash Using Quantitative X-ray Diffractometry,” Fuel, V. 85, No. 16, 2006, pp. 2268-2277. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.12.026
34. Ramachandran, V., Concrete Admixtures Handbook: Research Techniques, Standards and Specifications, second edition, William Andrew Publishing, New York, 1996, 1183 pp.
35. Senff, L.; Labrincha, J. A.; Ferreira, V. M.; Hotza, D.; and Repette, W. L., “Effect of Nano-Silica on Rheology and Fresh Properties of Cement Pastes and Mortars,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 23, No. 7, 2009, pp. 2487-2491. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.005
36. Babu, G. R., “Effect of Nano-Silica on Properties of Blended Cement,” International Journal of Computational Engineering Research, V. 3, No. 5, 2013, pp. 50-55.
37. Jumate, E., and Manea, D. L., “Application of X Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Scanning Eectron Microscopy (SEM) Methods to the Portland Cement Hydration Processes,” Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences, V. 2, No. 15, 2012, pp. 35-42.
38. Prochoń, P., and Piotrowski, T., “Bound Water Content Measurement in Cement Pastes by Stoichiometric and Gravimetric Analyses,” Journal of Building Chemistry, V. 1, No. 1, 2016, pp. 18-25.