Bond Strength of Reinforcing Bars with Varying Encapsulation Qualities

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Bond Strength of Reinforcing Bars with Varying Encapsulation Qualities

Author(s): Pasquale Basso Trujillo, Marc Jolin, Bruno Massicotte, and Benoît Bissonnette

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 115

Issue: 6

Appears on pages(s): 1707-1717

Keywords: artificial voids; beam end; bond strength; encapsulation; hypothesis testing; shotcrete; sprayed concrete; voids

DOI: 10.14359/51702415

Date: 11/1/2018

Abstract:
The encapsulation quality of reinforcing bars represents a common concern among structural engineers when shotcrete structures are designed. Because little scientific information is available regarding the potential bond strength reduction of bars with adjacent defects along their length, ASTM A944-10 “beam-end” specimens with different encasement qualities were tested. To limit the size variability of voids when spraying, voids were created using silicone inserts, which also made it possible to control their exact size and position. Artificial voids were encased with a placed shotcrete mixture and transversal lengths of up to 30% of the bars’ perimeter were investigated. A low water-binder ratio (w/b) was employed to guarantee an insignificant bleeding capacity of the mixture as is commonly observed in shotcrete. The results support previous investigations by showing that transversal void lengths beyond 20% induce a considerable change in the slope of the stress-slip curve and an important reduction of the ultimate bond stress.

Related References:

1. Warner, J., “Understanding Shotcrete—Structural Applications,” Concrete International, V. 17, No. 10, Oct. 1995, pp. 55-61.

2. Townsend, F. E. III, “Northern Boulevard Crossing Tunnel CQ039,” Shotcrete, V. 18, No. 1, Winter 2016, pp. 34-36.

3. Davis, B., “Holcim New Zealand Cement Terminal,” Shotcrete, V. 19, No. 1, Winter 2017, pp. 26-30.

4. Panian, L.; Steyer, M.; and Tipping, S., “Post-Tensioned Shotcrete Shearwalls,” Concrete International, V. 29, No. 10, Oct. 2007, pp. 39-45.

5. Townsend, F. E. III, “The Plaza Substation And Queen Structures,” Shotcrete, V. 18, No. 1, Winter 2016, pp. 22-23.

6. ACI Committee 506, “Visual Shotcrete Core Quality Evaluation (ACI 506.6T-17),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2017, 4 pp.

7. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 520 pp.

8. CSA A23.3-14, “Design of Concrete Structures,” Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga, ON, Canada, 2014, 297 pp.

9. Basso Trujillo, P.; Jolin, M.; Massicotte, B.; and Bissonnette, B., “Bond Strength of Reinforcing Bars Encased with Shotcrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 169, 2018, pp. 678-688. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.218

10. ASTM A944-10, “Standard Test Method for Comparing Bond Strength of Steel Reinforcing Bars to Concrete Using Beam-End Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010, 4 pp. https://doi.org/10.1520/A0944-10R1510.1520/A0944-10R15

11. Joint ACI-ASCE Committee 408, “Bond and Development of Straight Reinforcing Bars in Tension (ACI 408R-03),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2003, 49 pp.

12. Orangun, C. O.; Jirsa, J. O.; and Breen, J. E., “The Strength of Anchor Bars: A Reevaluation of the Test Data on Development Length and Splices,” University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 1975, 78 pp.

13. Jirsa, J. O.; Lutz, L. A.; and Gergely, P., “Rationale for Suggested Development, Splice, and Standard Hook Provisions for Deformed Bars in Tension,” Concrete International, V. 1, No. 7, July 1979, pp. 47-61.

14. ASTM A615-16, “Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 7 pp. https://doi.org/10.1520/A0615_A0615M-1610.1520/A0615_A0615M-16

15. ASTM A370-17, “Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products,” ASTM International, 2017, 49 pp. https://doi.org/10.1520/A0370-1710.1520/A0370-17

16. ASTM C494/C494M-17, “Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete,” ASTM International, 2017, 10 pp. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0494_C0494M-1710.1520/C0494_C0494M-17

17. ASTM C192/C192M-16a, “Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Laboratory,” ASTM International, 2016, 8 pp. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0192_C0192M-16A10.1520/C0192_C0192M-16A

18. ASTM C39/C39M-17a, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, 8 pp. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0039_C0039M-17B10.1520/C0039_C0039M-17B

19. ASTM C496-11, “Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011, 5 pp. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0496_C0496M-1110.1520/C0496_C0496M-11

20. ASTM C469-14, “Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014, 5 pp. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0469_C0469M10.1520/C0469_C0469M

21. ASTM C143/C143M-15a, “Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete,” ASTM International, 2015, 4 pp. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0143_C0143M-15A10.1520/C0143_C0143M-15A

22. ASTM C1611-14, “Standard Test Method for Slump Flow of Self-Consolidating Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014, 6 pp. https://doi.org/10.1520/C1611_C1611M-1410.1520/C1611_C1611M-14

23. ASTM C231/C231M-17, “Standard Test Method for Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Pressure Method,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, 9 pp. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0231_C0231M-17A10.1520/C0231_C0231M-17A

24. Josserand, L., and de Larrard, F., “A Method for Concrete Bleeding Measurement,” Materials and Structures, V. 37, No. 10, 2004, pp. 666-670. doi: 10.1007/BF02480511

25. ASTM C232-14, “Standard Test Method for Bleeding of Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014, 3 pp. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0232_C0232M10.1520/C0232_C0232M

26. Basso Trujillo, P.; Malo, R.; and Jolin, M., “Alternative Set-Up Apparatus to Test ASTM A944-10 Beam-End Specimens,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, V. 46, No. 4, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20170645

27. Montgomery, C. D., Design and Analysis of Experiments, seventh edition, 2009.

28. ASTM International, “Significance of Tests and Properties of Concrete and Concrete-Making Materials,” 2006, 664 pp. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP169D-EB10.1520/STP169D-EB

29. Darwin, D.; Zuo, J.; Tholen, M. L.; and Idun, E. K., “Development Length Criteria for Conventional and High Relative Rib Area Reinforcing Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 93, No. 3, May-June 1996, pp. 347-359. doi: 10.14359/9694

30. Zuo, J., and Darwin, D., “Splice Strength of Conventional and High Relative Rib Area Bars in Normal And High-Strength Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 97, No. 4, July-Aug. 2000, pp. 630-641. doi: 10.14359/7428

31. Miller, G. G.; Kepler, J. L.; and Darwin, D., “Effect of Epoxy Coating Thickness on Bond Strength of Reinforcing Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 100, No. 3, May-June 2003, pp. 314-320. doi: 10.14359/12606

32. Salem, H. M., and Maekawa, K., “Pre- and Postyield Finite Element Method Simulation of Bond of Ribbed Reinforcing Bars,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 130, No. 4, 2004, pp. 671-680. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:4(671)

33. Brettmann, B. B.; Darwin, D.; and Donahey, R. C., “Bond of Reinforcement to Superplasticized Concrete,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 83, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1986, pp. 98-107. doi: 10.14359/1743


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer