Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Lap Splices in Plastic Hinge Region

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Lap Splices in Plastic Hinge Region

Author(s): Chul-Goo Kim, Hong-Gun Park, and Tae-Sung Eom

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 115

Issue: 1

Appears on pages(s): 235-245

Keywords: cyclic test; lap splice; offset bar; reinforced concrete column; seismic performance

DOI: 10.14359/51701109

Date: 1/1/2018

Abstract:
For convenient bar placement, longitudinal bars in columns are often lap-spliced at the bottom of the columns where plastic hinge forms. In this study, the seismic performance of lap-spliced columns was investigated through cyclic loading tests. The bar splice length and shear span-to-height ratio were considered as the primary test variables. The test results showed that after flexural yielding, bond-splitting cracks propagated along the lap-spliced bars during repeated load cycles. The strength, ductility, and failure mode of the columns were significantly affected by the bar splice length and shear span-to-height ratio (or moment gradient). Based on the results, effects of moment gradient on the bond demand of spliced bars were studied, and a reduced splice length addressing the moment gradient was proposed. Furthermore, recommendations for the design and detailing of lap splices in the column plastic hinge region such as splice length, bar offset, and confining transverse reinforcement were provided.

Related References:

1. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 519 pp.

2. Eurocode 2, “Design of Concrete Structures: Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings,” British Standards Institution, London, UK, 2004.

3. Lynn, A. C.; Moehle, J. P.; Mahin, S. A.; and Holmes, W. T., “Seismic Evaluation of Existing Reinforced Concrete Building Columns,” Earthquake Spectra, V. 12, No. 4, 1996, pp. 715-739. doi: 10.1193/1.1585907

4. Aboutaha, R. S.; Engelhardt, M. D.; Jirsa, J. O.; and Kreger, M. E., “Experimental Investigation of Seismic Repair of Lap Splice Failures in Damaged Concrete Columns,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 96, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1999, pp. 297-306.

5. Melek, M., and Wallace, J. W., “Cyclic Behavior of Columns with Short Lap Splices,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 101, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2004, pp. 802-811.

6. Haroun, M. A., and Elsanadedy, H. M., “Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Jackets for Ductility Enhancement of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns with Poor Lap-Splice Detailing,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 10, No. 6, 2005, pp. 749-757. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:6(749)

7. Harries, K. A.; Ricles, J. M.; Pessiki, S.; and Sause, R., “Seismic Retrofit of Lap Splices in Nonductile Square Columns Using Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Jackets,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2006, pp. 874-884.

8. Harajli, M., “Seismic Behavior of RC Columns with Bond-Critical Regions: Criteria for Bond Strengthening Using External FRP Jackets,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 12, No. 1, 2008, pp. 69-79. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:1(69)

9. ACI Committee 315, “Details and Detailing of Concrete Reinforcement (ACI 315-99),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1999, pp. 1-44.

10. Boyes, A.; Bull, D. K.; and Pampanin, S., “Seismic Performance of Concrete Columns with Inadequate Transverse Reinforcement,” University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2008, 12 pp.

11. Paulay, T., “Lapped Splices in Earthquake-Resisting Columns,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 79, No. 6, June 1982, pp. 458-469.

12. Ferguson, P. M., and Krishnaswamy, C., “Tensile Lap Splices-Part 2: Design Recommendations for Retaining Wall Splices and Large Bar Splices,” Research Report No. 113-3, Center for Highway Research, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, July 1971, 67 pp.

13. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318-56),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1956, pp. 1-73.

14. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318-77),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1977, pp. 1-103.

15. ACI Committee 374, “Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames Based on Structural Testing and Commentary (ACI 374.1-05),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2005, pp. 1-9.

16. Bournas, D. A.; Triantafillou, T. C.; Zygouris, K.; and Stavropoulos, F., “Textile-Reinforced Mortar Versus Frp Jacketing in Seismic Retrofitting of RC Columns with Continuous or Lap-Spliced Deformed Bars,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 13, No. 5, 2009, pp. 360-371. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000028

17. ElGawady, M.; Endeshaw, M.; McLean, D.; and Sack, R., “Retrofitting of Rectangular Columns with Deficient Lap Splices,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 14, No. 1, 2010, pp. 22-35. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000047

18. Kim, C. G., Park, H. G., Eom, T. S., and Kim, T. W., “Performance of Lap Splices in Rectangular RC Columns,” Proceedings of Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, Oct. 2015, pp. 251-254.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer