Concrete Q&A: Field- versus Standard-Cured Cylinders made from High-Strength Concrete

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Concrete Q&A: Field- versus Standard-Cured Cylinders made from High-Strength Concrete

Author(s):

Publication: Concrete International

Volume: 39

Issue: 8

Appears on pages(s): 64

Keywords:

DOI:

Date: 8/1/2017

Abstract:
I’m a technician with a testing laboratory. On one of my projects, I understand that the specified strength is 10,000 psi (68.9 MPa), based on compressive tests of field-cured cylinders. For quality assurance, we are also testing standard-cured cylinders. The field-cured cylinders are consistently breaking at strengths that are 25 to 35% lower than the standard-cured specimens. Why such a difference in strength?

Related References:

1. ASTM C31/C31M-15ae1, “Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Field,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, 6 pp.

2. ASTM C511-13, “Standard Specification for Mixing Rooms, Moist Cabinets, Moist Rooms, and Water Storage Tanks Used in the Testing of Hydraulic Cements and Concretes,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, 3 pp.

3. Carino, N.J., and Meeks, K.W., “Curing of High-Performance Concrete for Strength—What is Sufficient?” Repair, Rehabilitation, and Maintenance of Concrete Structures and Innovations in Design and Construction, SP-193, V.M. Malhotra, ed., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2000, pp. 1-36.

4. Neville, A.M., Properties of Concrete, fifth edition, Pearson Education Limited, England, 2012, p. 326.




  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer