Experimental Behavior of High-Strength Concrete One-Way Slabs Subjected to Shock Loading

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Experimental Behavior of High-Strength Concrete One-Way Slabs Subjected to Shock Loading

Author(s): Ganesh Thiagarajan and Kristen Reynolds

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 114

Issue: 3

Appears on pages(s): 611-620

Keywords: blast loading; experimental behavior; reinforced concrete; resistance curves; single degree of freedom; slabs

DOI: 10.14359/51689421

Date: 5/1/2017

Abstract:
The design to resist blast loading is required in many private and governmental buildings. The research presented in this paper characterizes the response of high-strength concrete panels reinforced with high-strength vanadium steel and subjected to blast loading under controlled conditions. This work is intended to provide valuable data to study numerical models such as the commonly used single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) models. The experimental procedure used and data collected from high-strength reinforced concrete (RC) slabs having two different high-strength reinforcement ratios subjected to shockwave loadings using a blast load simulator are presented in this paper. The pressure, impulse, and deflection time histories generated from the experiments, along with the predicted panel deflections, are presented. The pressure impulse (PI) curves developed using an SDOF model are compared with the experimental data. Damage assessment generated from the blast load simulator experiments and a comparison of experimental behavior of high-strength RC slabs with regular-strength RC slabs are also presented. These results showed that the SDOF designs were conservative for the slabs having the lower reinforcement ratio. Experimental quantification of the dynamic resistance curves showed that the slabs with smaller longitudinal reinforcement spacing had greater ductility and post-yield behavior. Finally, the concrete damage patterns of the panels are shown and described.

Related References:

1. Smith, S. J.; McCann, D. M.; and Kamara, M. E., Blast-Resistant Design Guide for Reinforced Concrete Structures, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 2009, 128 pp.

2. Malvar, L. J., and Ross, C. A., “Review of Strain Rate Effects for Concrete in Tension,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 95, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1998, pp. 735-739.

3. Li, Q., and Meng, H., “Pressure-Impulse Diagram for Blast Loads Based on Dimensional Analysis and Single-Degree-of-Freedom Model,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, V. 128, No. 1, 2002, pp. 87-92. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:1(87)

4. Wu, C.; Oehlers, D. J.; Rebentrost, M.; Leach, J.; and Whittaker, A. S., “Blast Testing of Ultra-High Performance Fiber and FRP-Retrofitted Concrete Slabs,” Engineering Structures, V. 31, No. 9, 2009, pp. 2060-2069. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.03.020

5. Yi, N.-H.; Kim, J.-H. J.; Han, T.-S.; Cho, Y.-G.; and Lee, J. H., “Blast-Resistant Characteristics of Ultra-High Strength Concrete and Reactive Powder Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 28, No. 1, 2012, pp. 694-707. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.09.014

6. Yun, S.-H., and Park, T., “Multi-Physics Blast Analysis of Reinforced High Strength Concrete,” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, V. 17, No. 4, 2013, pp. 777-788. doi: 10.1007/s12205-013-0093-7

7. Du, H., and Li, Z., “Numerical Analysis of Dynamic Behavior of RC Slabs under Blast Loading,” Transactions of Tianjin University, V. 15, No. 1, 2009, pp. 61-64. doi: 10.1007/s12209-009-0012-7

8. Li, Q., and Meng, H., “Pressure-Impulse Diagram for Blast Loads Based on Dimensional Analysis and Single-Degree-of-Freedom Model,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, V. 128, No. 1, 2002, pp. 87-92. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:1(87)

9. Krauthammer, T.; Frye, M.; Schoedel, T.; and Seltzer, M., “Advanced SDOF Approach for Structural Concrete Systems Under Blast and Impact Loads,” Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium of Interaction of Minitions Effects with Structures, Manheim, Germany, 2003.

10. USACE, “Single Degree of Freedom Blast Design Spreadsheet (SBEDS) Methodology Manual,” PDC-TR 06-01, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Protective Design Center, Washington, DC, 2006.

11. Thiagarajan, G., and Johnson, C. F., “Experimental Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Slabs Subjected to Shock Loading,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 111, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2014, pp. 1407-1418. doi: 10.14359/51686970

12. Grote, D.; Park, S.; and Zhou, M., “Dynamic Behavior of Concrete at High Strain Rates and Pressures: I. Experimental Characterization,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, V. 25, No. 9, 2001, pp. 869-886. doi: 10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00020-3

13. Mays, G., and Smith, P. D., Blast Effects on Buildings: Design of Buildings to Optimize Resistance to Blast Loading, Thomas Telford, London, UK, 1995.

14. CEB, “Concrete Structures under Impact and Impulsive Loadings,” Synthesis Report No. 187, Comite Euro-International du Beton, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1988, 184 pp.

15. Morison, C. M., “Dynamic Response of Walls and Slabs by Single-Degree-of-Freedom Analysis—A Critical Review and Revision,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, V. 32, No. 8, 2006, pp. 1214-1247. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.11.008

16. ASCE, Design of Structures to Resist Nuclear Weapons Effects, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 1985, 300 pp.

17. Nebuda, D., “Single Degree of Freedom Blast Effects Design Spreadsheets,” U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC, 2005, pp. 2-4.

18. Ghani Razaqpur, A.; Tolba, A.; and Contestabile, E., “Blast Loading Response of Reinforced Concrete Panels Reinforced with Externally Bonded GFRP Laminates,” Composites. Part B, Engineering, V. 38, No. 5-6, 2007, pp. 535-546. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.016

19. Krauthammer, T., “Blast Mitigation Technologies: Developments and Numerical Considerations for Behavior Assessment and Design,” WIT Transactions on the Built Envrionment, 1998, 10 pp.

20. Karthaus, W., and Leussink, J., “Dynamic Loading: More than Just a Dynamic Load Factor,” Prins Maurits Laboratorium Tno Rijswijk, the Netherlands, 1983, pp. 10-14.

21. Shi, Y.; Hao, H.; and Li, Z., “Numerical Derivation of Pressure-Impulse Diagrams for Prediction of RC Column Damage to Blast Loads,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, V. 35, No. 11, 2008, pp. 1213-1227. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.09.001

22. USDOD, “United Facilities Criterion UFC 4-010-01,” DOD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings, 2012.

23. ASCE/SEI 59-11, “Blast Protection of Buildings,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2011.

24. Fallah, A. S., and Louca, L., “Pressure-Impulse Diagrams for Elastic-Plastic-Hardening and Softening Single-Degree-of-Freedom Models Subjected to Blast Loading,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, V. 34, No. 4, 2007, pp. 823-842. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.01.007


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer