Prestress Losses in Aged Hollow-Core Slabs and Their Long-Term Performance after Strengthening

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Prestress Losses in Aged Hollow-Core Slabs and Their Long-Term Performance after Strengthening

Author(s): Lang Liu, Xuelian Chen, Xuanwen Liu, and Qingyuan Li

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 123

Issue: 4

Appears on pages(s): 295-307

Keywords: hollow-core slab; long-term performance; prestress loss; probability density evolution method (PDEM); structural strengthening

DOI: 10.14359/51750658

Date: 7/1/2026

Abstract:
Prestressed hollow-core slabs (PHCSs) were extensively employed in residential construction in earlier decades, yet the extent of prestress loss in these aged structures that have experienced long-term service remains unquantified, despite its governing influence on structural performance. With the current emphasis on renovating aging residential areas, various retrofitting approaches were proposed to enhance loading capacities and extend service life; however, the long-term performance of such strengthened structures requires thorough investigation. This study examines five full-scale PHCSs through comparative experimental testing: two unstrengthened specimens, two carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP)-strengthened specimens, and one composite slab-strengthened specimen. A two-phase loading protocol, combining low-level cyclic loading and monotonic loading, is implemented to evaluate prestress loss and ultimate capacity. The experiment reveals an average prestress loss of 17.64%, and CFRP strengthening and superimposed strengthening yield immediate improvement of cracking load by 25% and 58%, respectively. The experimental results are validated by numerical simulations and compared with theoretical calculations specified in design codes. Furthermore, upon experimental and simulation results, a probability density evolution method (PDEM)-based approach is developed to assess time-dependent structural reliability, incorporating material degradation models and inherent uncertainties. The proposed methodology enables accurate estimation of prestress loss in aged PHCSs and systematically evaluates the long-term performance of different strengthening methods.

Related References:

1. Saha, A. S.; Throckmorton, E.; Lucier, G.; Seracino, R.; and Proestos, G. T., “Determing Prestress Losses, Residual Capacity, and Degradation from Testing of Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders After 56 Years of Service,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 30, No. 2, 2025, p. 04024115. doi: 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6966

2. Páez, P. M., “A Simplified Approach to Determine the Prestress Loss and Time-Dependent Deflection in Cracked Prestressed Concrete Members, Prestressed with Fiber Reinforced Polymers or Steel Tendons,” Engineering Structures, V. 279, 2023, p. 115523. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115523

3. Xiao, J.; Peng, J.; Yang, Y.; Dong, Y.; Cheng, X.; and Zhang, J., “Comprehensive Assessment of Prestress Loss in Post-Tensioned Prestressed Concrete Structures Exposed to Wet-Dry Cycles in Chloride Environments,” Engineering Structures, V. 328, 2025, p. 119691. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119691

4. Lee, S.; Shin, S.; and Lee, C., “Thermal Prestress Losses in Normal- and High-Early-Strength Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 119, No. 6, Nov. 2022, pp. 221-231. doi: 10.14359/51736114

5. Szydłowski, R. S., and Łabuzek, B., “Experimental Evaluation of Shrinkage, Creep and Prestress Losses in Lightweight Aggregate Concrete with Sintered Fly Ash,” Materials, V. 14, No. 14, 2021, pp. 3895-3908. doi: 10.3390/ma14143895

6. ACI Committee 423, “Guide to Estimating Prestress Loss (ACI 423.10R-16),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2016, 9 pp.

7. Botte, W.; Vereecken, E.; Taerwe, L.; and Caspeele, R., “Assessment of Posttensioned Concrete Beams from the 1940s: Large-Scale Load Testing, Numerical Analysis and Bayesian Assessment of Prestressing Losses,” Structural Concrete, V. 22, No. 3, 2021, pp. 1500-1522. doi: 10.1002/suco.202000774

8. Garber, D.; Gallardo, J.; Deschenes, D.; and Bayrak, O., “Experimental Investigation of Prestress Losses in Full-Scale Bridge Girders,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 112, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2015, pp. 553-564. doi: 10.14359/51687909

9. Higgs, A.; Barr, P. J.; and Halling, M. W., “Comparison of Measured and AASHTO LRFD-Predicted Residual Prestress Forces, Shear and Flexural Capacities of High-Strength Prestressed-Concrete Bridge Girders,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 20, No. 1, 2015, p. 05014009. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000646

10. Lv, Y. G.; Wu, P.; Chou, J. X.; Han, W. W.; Su, M.; and Peng, H., “An Experimental Study on the Interfacial Bonding Performance of Horizontally Embedded CFRP Strips to Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 369, 2023, p. 130514. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130514

11. Yang, M. Y.; Xie, J. J.; Kainuma, S.; and Liu, W. J., “Improvement in Bond Behavior and Thermal Properties of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Strengthened Steel Structures,” Composite Structures, V. 278, 2021, p. 114704. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114704

12. Spartali, H.; Hegger, J.; and Chudoba, R., “Phenomenological Comparison Between the Flexural Performance of Steel- and CFRP-Reinforced Concrete Elements,” Engineering Structures, V. 294, No. 1, 2023, p. 130514. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116755

13. Kumar, A., and Jangid, R. S., “Shear Strength Prediction of CFRP-Strengthened Deep RC Beams Without Shear Reinforcement,” Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation, V. 9, No. 2, 2024, pp. 1-13. doi: 10.1007/s41024-024-00442-2

14. Bai, J. H.; Yang, Y.; Huang, P. Y.; Guo, X. Y.; Chen, Z. B.; Wan-Wendner, R.; and Li, W., “Durability of CFRP Strengthened RC Beam After Six Years Exposure to Natural Hygrothermal Environment with Sustained Loads,” International Journal of Fatigue, V. 181, 2024, p. 108126. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.108126

15. Bigaud, D., and Ali, O., “Time-Variant Flexural Reliability of RC Beams with Externally Bonded CFRP Under Combined Fatigue-Corrosion Actions,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, V. 131, 2014, pp. 257-270. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.04.016

16. Dias-da-Costa, D.; Neves, L. A. C.; Gomes, S.; Hadigheh, S. A.; and Fernandes, P., “Time-Dependent Reliability Analyses of Prestressed Concrete Girders Strengthened with CFRP Laminates,” Engineering Structures, V. 196, 2019, pp. 109297. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109297

17. JGJ/T 384, “Technical Specification for Core Drilling Method to Detect Concrete Strength,” Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, China, 2016.

18. JGJ 19-92, “Code for Design and Construction of Cold-Drawn Low Carbon Steel Strands Prestressed Concrete Members,” Ministry of Construction of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, China, 1992.

19. GB 50010-2010, “Code for Design of Concrete Structures,” Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, China, 2010.

20. GB 50367-2013, “Code for Design of Strengthening Concrete Structures,” Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, China, 2013.

21. Yunnan Design Institute, “Southwest G211 Prestressed Slab,” Kunming, China.

22. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 519 pp.

23. Li, J., and Chen, J. B., “The Probability Density Evolution Method for Dynamic Response Analysis of Non‐Linear Stochastic Structures,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, V. 65, No. 6, 2006, pp. 882-903. doi: 10.1002/nme.1479

24. Eisa, A. S., and Aboul-Nour, L. A., EI-Ghamry, E. A.; Zelenakova, M.; Katunsky, D., “Flexural Behavior of Two-Layer Reinforced Concrete Slab with Hollow Cores,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, V. 16, No. 2, 2024, pp. 1-20. doi: 10.1177/16878132231224940

25. Qiao, H. P.; Lu, Z. H.; and Li, C. Q., Cai, C. H.; andWang, C., “Time-Dependent Reliability Analysis for Non-Differentiable Limit State Functions Due to Discrete Load Processes,” Structural Safety, V. 114, No. 4, 2025, p. 102576. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2025.102576

26. Jin, W. L.; Yuan, Y. S.; and Wei, J., Durability Theory and Design Method of Concrete Structure in Chloride Environment, Science Press, Beijing, China, 2011.

27. Yu, M. H., “Unified Strength Theory for Geomaterials and its Application,” Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao, V. 16, No. 2, 1994, pp. 1-10.

28. Niu, D. T.; Wang, Q. L.; and Wang, L. K., “Predetermine Model of Steel Corrosion Extent in Reinforced Concrete Structures Before Producing Corrosion Crack,” Industrial Construction, V. 26, No. 4, 1996, pp. 8-10.

29. Engel, S.; Hegger, J.; and Classen, M., “Multimodal Automated Fabrication with Concrete: Case Study and Structural Performance of Ribbed CFRP-Reinforced Concrete Ceilings,” Additive Manufacturing, V. 101, 2025, p. 104689. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2025.104689

30. Noor, R., and Tamura, H., Katsuchi, H.; andJiaqi, W., “Study on the Assessment of Fatigue Durability of Corroded Steel Girder Ends Repaired with Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer,” International Journal of Steel Structures, V. 23, No. 2, 2023, pp. 1500-1512. doi: 10.1007/s13296-023-00784-6


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal