Title:
Axial Load Effects on Nuclear Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls with High-Strength Reinforcing Bars under Ground Motion Sequences: Hybrid Simulation Testing and Modeling Assessment
Author(s):
Mohamed Abouyoussef, Ahmed Akl, and Mohamed Ezzeldin
Publication:
Structural Journal
Volume:
123
Issue:
1
Appears on pages(s):
31-46
Keywords:
axial load ratio; high-strength reinforcement (HSR); hybrid simulation; low aspect ratio; nuclear facilities; reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls
DOI:
10.14359/51749164
Date:
1/1/2026
Abstract:
Previous research studies have been conducted to study the seismic response of low-aspect-ratio reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls when designed using normal-strength reinforcement (NSR) versus high-strength reinforcement (HSR). Such studies demonstrated that the use of HSR has the potential to address several constructability issues in nuclear construction practice by reducing the required steel areas and subsequently reinforcing bar congestion. However, the response of nuclear RC shear walls (that is, aspect ratios of less than 1) with both HSR and axial loads has not been yet evaluated under ground motion sequences. As such, most nuclear design standards restrict the use of HSR in nuclear RC shear wall systems. Such design standards do not also consider the influence of axial loads when the shear-strength capacity of such walls is calculated. To address this gap, the current study investigates the influence of axial load on the performance of nuclear RC shear walls with HSR when subjected to ground motion sequences using hybrid simulation testing and modeling assessment techniques. In this respect, two RC shear walls (that is, W1-HSR and W2-HSR-AL) with an aspect ratio of 0.83 are investigated. Wall W2-HSR-AL had an axial load of 3.5% of its axial compressive strength, whereas Wall W1-HSR had no axial load. The test walls were subjected to a wide range of ground motion records, from operational basis earthquake (OBE) to beyond design basis earthquake (BDBE) levels. The experimental results of the walls are discussed in terms of their damage sequences, cracking patterns, ductility capacities, effective periods, and reinforcing bar strains. The test results were then used to develop and validate a numerical OpenSees model that simulates the seismic response of nuclear RC shear walls with different axial load levels. Finally, the experimental and numerical results were compared to the current ASCE 41 backbone model for RC shear walls. The experimental results demonstrate that Walls W1-HSR and W2-HSR-AL showed similar crack patterns and subsequent shear-flexure failures; however, the former had wider cracks relative to the latter during the different ground motion records. In addition, the axial load reduced the displacement ductility of Wall W2-HSR-AL by 18% compared to Wall W1-HSR. Moreover, the ASCE 41 backbone model was not able to adequately capture the seismic response of the two test walls. The current study enlarges the experimental and numerical/analytical database pertaining to the seismic performance of low-aspect-ratio RC shear walls with HSR to facilitate their adoption in nuclear construction practice.
Related References:
1. Barbachyn, S. M.; Devine, R. D.; Thrall, A. P.; and Kurama, Y. C., “Behavior of Nuclear RC Shear Walls Designed for Similar Lateral Strengths Using Normal-Strength versus High-Strength Materials,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 146, No. 11, 2020, p. 04020252. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002818
2. Abouyoussef, M., and Ezzeldin, M., “Fragility and Economic Evaluations of High-Strength Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls in Nuclear Power Plants,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 149, No. 5, 2023, p. 04023035. doi: 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-11397
3. Lovering, J. R.; Yip, A.; and Nordhaus, T., “Historical Construction Costs of Global Nuclear Power Reactors,” Energy Policy, V. 91, Apr. 2016, pp. 371-382. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.011
4. Park, H. G.; Baek, J. W.; Lee, J. H.; and Shin, H. M., “Cyclic Loading Tests for Shear Strength of Low-Rise RC Walls with Grade 550 MPa Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 112, No. 3, May-June 2015, pp. 299-310. doi: 10.14359/51687406
5. Cheng, M. Y.; Hung, S. C.; Lequesne, R. D.; and Lepage, A., “Earthquake-Resistant Squat Walls Reinforced with High-Strength Steel,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 113, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2016, pp. 1065-1076.
6. Proestos, G. T.; Bae, G. M.; Cho, J. Y.; Bentz, E. C.; and Collins, M. P., “Influence of High-Strength Bars on Shear Response of Containment Walls,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 113, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2016, pp. 917-928. doi: 10.14359/51688750
7. Cheng, M. Y.; Wibowo, L. S.; Giduquio, M. B.; and Lequesne, R. D., “Strength and Deformation of RC Squat Walls with High-Strength Materials,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 118, No. 1, Jan. 2021, pp. 125-137.
8. ACI Committee 349, “Code Requirements for Nuclear Safety-Related Concrete Structures and Commentary (ACI 349-13),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2013, 196 pp.
9. CSA N287.3:14, “Design Requirements for Containment Structures for Nuclear Power Plants,” CSA Group, Toronto, ON, Canada.
10. Greifenhagen, C., and Lestuzzi, P., “Static Cyclic Tests on Lightly Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls,” Engineering Structures, V. 27, No. 11, 2005, pp. 1703-1712. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.06.008
11. Wallace, J. W., “Chile Earthquake: Preliminary Observations on Structural Performance and Implications for US Building Codes and Standards,” Structures Congress 2011, Las Vegas, NV, Apr. 14-16, 2011, pp. 1672-1685.
12. Rama Rao, V.; Gopalakrishnan, N.; Jaya, K. P.; Muthumani, K.; Reddy, G. R.; and Parulekar, Y. M., “Studies on Nonlinear Behavior of Walls of Medium Aspect Ratio under Monotonic and Cyclic Loading,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, V. 30, No. 1, 2016, p. 04014201. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000724
13. Terzioglu, T.; Orakcal, K.; and Massone, L. M., “Cyclic Lateral Load Behavior of Squat Reinforced Concrete Walls,” Engineering Structures, V. 160, 2018, pp. 147-160. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.024
14. Guo, Z. X., and Lu, X. L., “Experimental Study on the Hysteretic Model of RC Columns with High Axial Compressive Ratio,” Tumu Gongcheng Xuebao, V. 37, 2004, pp. 5-31.
15. Westenenk, B.; de la Llera, J. C.; Besa, J. J.; Jünemann, R.; Moehle, J.; Lüders, C.; Inaudi, J. A.; Elwood, K. J.; and Hwang, S.-J., “Response of Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Concepción during the Maule Earthquake,” Earthquake Spectra, V. 28, No. 1, 2012, pp. 257-280. doi: 10.1193/1.4000037
16. Alarcon, C.; Hube, M. A.; and De la Llera, J. C., “Effect of Axial Loads in the Seismic Behavior of RC Walls with Unconfined Wall Boundaries,” Engineering Structures, V. 73, 2014, pp. 13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.047
17. Looi, D. T. W.; Su, R. K. L.; Cheng, B.; and Tsang, H., “Effects of Axial Load on Seismic Performance of RC Walls with Short Shear Span,” Engineering Structures, V. 151, 2017, pp. 312-326. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.08.030
18. Baek, J. W.; Park, H. G.; Lee, J. H.; and Bang, C. J., “Cyclic Loading for Walls of Aspect Ratio 1.0 and 0.5 with 550 MPa Shear Reinforcing Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 114, No. 4, July-Aug. 2017, pp. 969-982. doi: 10.14359/51689680
19. Baek, J. W.; Park, H. G.; Shin, H. M.; and Yim, S. J., “Cyclic Loading Test for RC Walls with Grade 550 MPa Shear Reinforcing Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 114, No. 3, May-June 2017, pp. 673-686. doi: 10.14359/51689437
20. Baek, W.; Park, G.; Lee, S.; and Shin, M., “Shear-Friction Strength of Low-Rise Walls with 550 MPa Reinforcing Bars under Cyclic Loading,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 115, No. 1, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.14359/51718020
21. Whyte, C. A., and Stojadinovic, B., “Effect of Ground Motion Sequence on Response of Squat Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 140, No. 8, 2014, p. A4014004. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000912
22. Hung, C., and Hsieh, L., “Comparative Study on Shear Failure Behavior of High-Strength Steel RC Shear Walls with High-Strength Concrete Materials,” Structures, V. 23, 2020, pp. 56-68. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2019.11.002
23. Astroza, R.; Ebrahimian, H.; Conte, J. P.; Restrepo, J. I.; and Hutchinson, T. C., “System Identification of a Full‐Scale Five‐Story Reinforced Concrete Building Tested on the NEES‐UCSD Shake Table,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, V. 23, No. 3, 2016, pp. 535-559. doi: 10.1002/stc.1778
24. Ghorbanirenani, I.; Tremblay, R.; Léger, P.; and Leclerc, M., “Shake Table Testing of Slender RC Shear Walls Subjected to Eastern North America Seismic Ground Motions,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 138, No. 12, 2012, pp. 1515-1529. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000581
25. Panagiotou, M.; Restrepo, I.; and Conte, P., “Shake-Table Test of a Full-Scale 7-Story Building Slice: Rectangular Wall,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 137, No. 6, 2011, pp. 691-704. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000332
26. McCrum, D. P., and Williams, M. S., “An Overview of Seismic Hybrid Testing of Engineering Structures,” Engineering Structures, V. 118, 2016, pp. 240-261. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.039
27. Shao, X., and Griffith, C., “An Overview of Hybrid Simulation Implementations in NEES Projects,” Engineering Structures, V. 56, 2013, pp. 1439-1451. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.008
28. Luna, B.; Whittaker, A.; and Rivera, J., “Seismic Behavior of Low-Aspect-Ratio Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 112, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2013, pp. 593-604.
29. Abouyoussef, M., and Ezzeldin, M., “Hybrid Simulation Testing of Normal and High-Strength RC Shear Walls in Nuclear Facilities under Ground Motion Sequences,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 151, No. 4, 2025, p. 04025022. doi: 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-13968
30. Akl, A., and Ezzeldin, M., “Hybrid Simulation Testing of Two-Storey Low-Aspect-Ratio Nuclear RC Shear Walls with Normal- and High-Strength Reinforcement: Seismic Performance Evaluation and Economic Assessment,” Structures, V. 69, 2024, p. 107200. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107200
31. FEMA 306, “Evaluation of Earthquake Damaged Concrete and Masonry Buildings Basic Procedures Manual,” Applied Technology Council, Washington, DC, 1998.
32. FEMA 308, “Repair of Earthquake Damaged Concrete and Masonry Wall Buildings,” Applied Technology Council, Washington, DC, 1998.
33. McKenna, F.; Fenves, G. L.; and Scott, M. H., “Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees),” University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 2000.
34. OpenFresco, “Open Framework for Experimental Setup and Control,” 2013, https://openfresco.berkeley.edu. (last accessed Oct. 13, 2025)
35. Chae, Y.; Park, M.; Kim, C. Y.; and Park, Y. S., “Experimental Study on the Rate-Dependency of Reinforced Concrete Structures Using Slow and Real-Time Hybrid Simulations,” Engineering Structures, V. 132, 2017, pp. 648-658. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.065
36. USNRC (US Nuclear Regulatory Commission), “Design Certification Applications for New Reactors,” 2019, http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/design-cert. (last accessed Oct. 13, 2025)
37. Akl, A., and Ezzeldin, M., “Seismic Hybrid Testing of Two-Story Low Aspect Ratio RC Shear Walls with Different Configurations in Nuclear Facilities,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 151, No. 2, 2025, p. 04024206. doi: 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-13588
38. ASTM A615/A615M-20, “Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020, 8 pp.
39. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 624 pp.
40. ASCE/SEI 43-05, “Seismic Design Criteria for Structures, Systems, and Components in Nuclear Facilities,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2005.
41. CSA A23.3, “Design of Concrete Structures,” CSA Group, Toronto, ON, Canada.
42. Barda, F.; Hanson, J. M.; and Corley, W. G., “Shear Strength of Low-Rise Walls with Boundary Elements,” Reinforced Concrete Structures in Seismic Zones, SP-53, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1977, pp. 149-202.
43. Wood, S. L., “Shear Strength of Low-Rise RC Walls,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 87, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1990, pp. 99-107.
44. Gulec, C. K., “Performance-Based Assessment and Design of Squat Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls,” MCEER-09-0010, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 2009.
45. ACI Committee 439, “Guide for the Use of ASTM A1035/A1035M Type CS Grade 100 (690) Steel Bars for Structural Concrete (ACI 439.6R-19),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 100 pp.
46. ASTM C39/C39M-20, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020, 8 pp.
47. Huang, Y. N.; Whittaker, A. S.; Kennedy, R. P.; and Mayes, R. L., “Response of Base‐Isolated Nuclear Structures for Design and Beyond‐Design Basis Earthquake Shaking,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, V. 42, No. 3, 2013, pp. 339-356. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2209
48. ZEISS INSPECT, 2023, https://www.zeiss.com/metrology/us/software/metrology-software.html. (last accessed Oct. 13, 2025)
49. Vladimir, A. G., 2016, “Point Clouds Registration and Generation from Stereo Images,” Information Content and Processing, V. 3, No. 2, pp. 193-199.
50. CSA N289.3-20, “Design Procedures for Seismic Qualification of Nuclear Power Plants,” CSA Group, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2020.
51. Woods, J. E.; Lau, D. T.; and Erochko, J., “Evaluation by Hybrid Simulation of Earthquake-Damaged RC Walls Repaired for in-Plane Bending with Single-Sided CFRP Sheets,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 24, No. 6, 2020, p. 04020073. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001085
52. Lu, X.; Xie, L.; Guan, H.; Huang, Y.; and Lu, X., “A Shear Wall Element for Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of Buildings in OpenSees,” Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, V. 98, 2015, pp. 14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.finel.2015.01.006
53. ASCE/SEI 41-23, “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2023.
54. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-08) and Commentary (ACI 318R-08),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2008, 473 pp.