Title:
Novel Post-Tensioning Anchorage Solution with Ultra-High-Performance Concrete for Seismic Retrofit of Nonductile Reinforced Concrete Walls
Author(s):
Sumedh Sharma, Sriram Aaleti, and Pinar Okumus
Publication:
Structural Journal
Volume:
122
Issue:
5
Appears on pages(s):
122-138
Keywords:
anchorage of post-tensioning; experimental testing; reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls; seismic retrofit; selective weakening; self-centering; ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC)
DOI:
10.14359/51746817
Date:
9/1/2025
Abstract:
This study introduces a new anchorage strategy using ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) to attach unbonded post-
tensioning (PT) strands to existing foundations. This solution complements a seismic retrofit scheme investigated by the authors, which transforms nonductile cast-in-place reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls into unbonded PT rocking shear walls following concepts of selective weakening and self-centering. In the proposed PT anchorage scheme, mild steel reinforcements are inserted through the shear wall thickness and into the foundation. Subsequently, UHPC is cast around the wall base, forming a vertical extension connected to the foundation, which is used to anchor the unbonded PT strands. The feasibility and performance of the anchorage scheme was investigated through a combination of laboratory testing and numerical simulations. Pullout testing on four scaled-down anchorage specimens was conducted in the laboratory. Hairline cracks were observed in the UHPC during testing. Additionally, three-dimensional (3-D) finite element (FE) models were created, validated, and used to study the performance of the proposed anchorage scheme under lateral loading. The simulation results support the effectiveness of the proposed anchorage strategy.
Related References:
1. Lin, R.-G. II, “California Earthquake Standard Designed to Save Lives but Not Buildings. There’s a New Push to do Both,” Los Angeles Times, Mar. 15, 2018.
2. Calvi, G. M.; Sullivan, T. J.; and Welch, D. P., “A Seismic Performance Classification Framework to Provide Increased Seismic Resilience, Perspectives on European Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, V. 34, 2014, pp. 361-400.
3. Craymer, L., “Christchurch Struggles with Shaky Recovery From 2011 Quake,” The Wall Street Journal, July 10, 2015.
4. Pampanin, S., “Controversial Aspects in Seismic Assessment and Retrofit of Structures in Modern Times: Understanding and Implementing Lessons from Ancient Heritage,” Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, V. 39, No. 2, 2006, pp. 120-133. doi: 10.5459/bnzsee.39.2.120-133
5. Kam, W. Y., and Pampanin, S., “Selective Weakening Techniques for Retrofit of Existing Reinforced Concrete Structures,” The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, 2008.
6. Pampanin, S., “Alternative Performance-Based Retrofit Strategies and Solutions for Existing RC Buildings, in Seismic Risk Assessment and Retrofitting: With Special Emphasis on Existing Low Rise Structures, A. Ilki, F. Karadogan, S. Pala, and E. Yuksel, eds., Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 2009, pp. 267-295.
7. Sharma, S., “Seismic Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall by Integrating Selective Weakening and Self Centering,” PhD dissertation, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, 2022.
8. Basereh, S., “Resilient Seismic Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls Using Selective Weakening and Self-Centering,” PhD dissertation, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 2021.
9. Basereh, S.; Okumus, P.; and Aaleti, S., “Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls Retrofitted Using Weakening and Self-Centering: Numerical Modelling,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 146, No. 7, 2020, p. 04020122. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002669
10. Sharma, S.; Aaleti, S.; and Okumus, P., “Experimental Testing of RC Shear Wall Seismic Retrofit Using Selective Weakening, Self-Centering and Ultra High Performance Concrete,” Resilient Cities and Structures, V. 2, No. 1, 2023, pp. 76-90.
11. Basereh, S., “Testing and Predicting the Response of Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls Retrofitted for Recentering,” Engineering Structures, V. 291, 2023, p. 116384.
12. Ruiz, M. F.; Muttoni, A.; and Kunz, J., “Strengthening of Flat Slabs Against Punching Shear Using Post-Installed Shear Reinforcement,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 107, No. 4, July-Aug. 2010, pp. 434-442.
13. Breveglieri, M.; Aprile, A.; and Barros, J. A. O., “Shear Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams Strengthened Using Embedded Through Section Steel Bars,” Engineering Structures, V. 81, 2014, pp. 76-87. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.026
14. Ronanki, V. S.; Aaleti, S.; and Valentim, D. B., “Experimental Investigation of Bond Behavior of Mild Steel Reinforcement in UHPC,” Engineering Structures, V. 176, 2018, pp. 707-718. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.031
15. Ronanki, V. S., and Aaleti, S., “Experimental and Analytical Investigation of UHPC Confined Concrete Behavior,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 325, 2022, p. 126710. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126710
16. Russell, H. G., and Graybeal, B. A., Ultra-High Performance Concrete: A State-of-the-Art Report for the Bridge Community, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 2013.
17. Sharma, S.; Ronanki, V. S.; Aaleti, S.; and Okumus, P., “Experimental Investigation of Surface Preparation on Normal and Ultra High Performance Concrete Interface Behavior,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 26, No. 4, 2021, p. 04021010. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001697
18. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19) (Reapproved 2022),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 624 pp.
19. Hilti, “HILTI,” Hilti Corporation, Schaan, Liechtenstein, 2022, https://www.hilti.com/. (last accessed Aug. 19, 2025).
20. Holcim, “Ductal®,” LaFargeHolcim US, Chicago, IL, 2022, https://www.ductal.com/en. (last accessed Aug. 19, 2025).
21. DURA, “DURA®,” DURA Concrete Canada Inc., Lakeshore, ON, Canada, 2022, https://www.duraconcrete.ca/. (last accessed Aug. 19, 2025).
22. Graybeal, B., and Davis, M., “Cylinder or Cube: Strength testing of 80 to 200 MPa (11.6 to 29 ksi) Ultra-High Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 105, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2008, pp. 603-609.
23. ASTM C39/C39M-20, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020.
24. ASTM E8/E8M-13, “Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013.
25. Červenka, V., and Jendele, L. Č., J., ATENA Program Documentation Part 1 Theory, Červenka Consulting, Prague, Czech Republic, 2020.
26. ACI Committee 550, “Acceptance Criteria for Special Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Structural Walls Based on Validation Testing (ACI 550.6-19) and Commentary,” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 20 pp.
27. Lowes, L. N.; Lehman, D. E.; and Whitman, Z., “Investigation of Failure Mechanisms and Development of Design Recommendations for Flexural Reinforced Concrete Walls,” Engineering Structures, V. 186, 2019, pp. 323-335. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.122