Torsional Strength of Reinforced Concrete Members Failing by Crushing

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Torsional Strength of Reinforced Concrete Members Failing by Crushing

Author(s): Allan Kuan, Evan C. Bentz, and Michael P. Collins

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 119

Issue: 6

Appears on pages(s): 233-244

Keywords: crushing; design; high strength; maximum torsion strength; shear; space truss; torsion

DOI: 10.14359/51736115

Date: 11/1/2022

Abstract:
The torsional strength of reinforced concrete members that fail by yielding of the reinforcement can be accurately predicted by design codes such as ACI 318-19 and the Canadian design standard CSA A23.3:19. However, these codes are relatively poor at predicting the strength of heavily reinforced members that fail by crushing. This paper presents a rational model which can predict the strength of such members. A key feature of the model is that the variation in torsional stresses through the thickness of a member is explicitly considered using stress block factors derived from the stress strain curve of the concrete. The model predicts the strength of 31 experiments with an average test-to-predicted ratio of 1.20 and a coefficient of variation (COV) of 14.4%. This is significantly better than the maximum torsion limits in ACI 318-19 (mean 1.62, COV 21.0%) and CSA A23.3:19 (mean 0.79, COV 41.1%). Simple equations suitable for design are presented.

Related References:

1. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 623 pp.

2. CSA A23.3:19, “Design of Concrete Structures,” CSA Group, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2019, 295 pp.

3. Bentz, E. C.; Vecchio, F. J.; and Collins, M. P., “The Simplified MCFT for Calculating the Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Elements,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 4, July-Aug. 2006, pp. 614-624.

4. MacGregor, J. G., and Ghoneim, M. G., “Design for Torsion,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 92, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1995, pp. 211-218.

5. Proestos, G. T.; Bentz, E. C.; and Collins, M. P., “Maximum Shear Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Members,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 115, No. 5, Sept. 2018, pp. 1463-1474. doi: 10.14359/51702252

6. Rahal, K. N., “Torsional Strength of Normal and High Strength Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Engineering Structures, V. 56, 2013, pp. 2206-2216. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.09.005

7. Bernardo, L. F. A., and Lopes, S. M. R., “Torsion in High-Strength Concrete Hollow Beams: Strength and Ductility Analysis,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 106, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2009, pp. 39-48.

8. Kuan, A.; Bruun, E. P. G.; Bentz, E. C.; and Collins, M. P., “Alternative Design Procedures for Torsion in ACI 318-19: A Comparative Study,” Examples for the Design of Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Members Under Torsion, SP-344, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2020, pp. 64-91.

9. Zia, P., and McGee, D. W., “Torsion Design of Prestressed Concrete,” PCI Journal, V. 19, No. 2, 1974, pp. 46-65. doi: 10.15554/pcij.03011974.46.65

10. Zia, P., and Hsu, T. T. C., “Design for Torsion and Shear in Prestressed Concrete Flexural Members,” PCI Journal, V. 49, No. 3, 2004, pp. 34-42. doi: 10.15554/pcij.05012004.34.42

11. Rahal, K. N., “A Unified Approach to Shear and Torsion in Reinforced Concrete,” Structural Engineering and Mechanics, V. 77, No. 5, 2021, pp. 691-703.

12. Mitchell, D., and Collins, M. P., “Diagonal Compression Field Theory - A Rational Model for Structural Concrete in Pure Torsion,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 71, No. 8, Aug. 1974, pp. 396-408.

13. Hsu, T. T. C., “Softened Truss Model Theory for Shear and Torsion,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 85, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1988, pp. 624-635.

14. Mitchell, D., “The Behaviour of Structural Concrete Beams in Pure Torsion,” PhD thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 1974, 140 pp.

15. Collins, M. P., “The Torque-Twist Characteristics of Reinforced Concrete Beams,” SM Study No. 8, Inelasticity and Non-Linearity in Structural Concrete, University of Waterloo Press, Waterloo, ON, Canada, 1972, pp. 211-232.

16. Popovics, S., “A Numerical Approach to the Complete Stress-Strain Curve of Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 3, No. 5, 1973, pp. 583-599. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(73)90096-3

17. Thorenfeldt, E.; Tomaszewics, A.; and Jensen, J. J., “Mechanical Properties of High-Strength Concrete and Application in Design,” Proceedings of the Symposium Utilization of High Strength Concrete, Tapir, Trondheim, Norway, 1987, pp. 149-159.

18. Collins, M. P., and Porasz, A., “Shear Design for High Strength Concrete,” CEB Bulletin d’Information, V. 193, Dec, 1989, pp. 77-83.

19. Collins, M. P., and Mitchell, D., Prestressed Concrete Structures, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991, 766 pp.

20. Vecchio, F. J., and Collins, M. P., “The Modified Compression Field Theory for Reinforced Concrete Elements Subjected to Shear,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 83, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1986, pp. 219-231.

21. Wight, J. K., and MacGregor, J. G., Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design, sixth edition, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2012, 1157 pp.

22. Koutchoukali, N. E., and Belarbi, A., “Torsion of High-Strength Reinforced Concrete Beams and Minimum Reinforcement Requirement,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 98, No. 4, July-Aug. 2001, pp. 462-469.

23. Koutchoukali, N. E., “Non-Linear Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beams Subjected to Pure Torsion,” PhD thesis, Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, MO, 1998, 138 pp.

24. Kim, C.; Kim, S.; Kim, K.-H.; Shin, D.; Haroon, M.; and Lee, J.-Y., “Torsion Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Beams with High-Strength Steel Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 116, No. 6, Nov. 2019, pp. 251-263.

25. Lee, J.-Y.; Kim, K.-H.; Lee, S.-H.; Kim, C.; and Kim, M.-H., “Maximum Torsional Reinforcement of Reinforced Concrete Beams Subjected to Pure Torsion,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 115, No. 3, May 2018, pp. 749-760. doi: 10.14359/51701108

26. Yoon, S.-K.; Lee, S.-C.; Lee, D.-H.; and Lee, J.-Y., “Failure Modes of RC Beams with High Strength Reinforcement,” Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, V. 26, No. 2, 2014, pp. 143-150. doi: 10.4334/JKCI.2014.26.2.143

27. Fang, I. K., and Shiau, J. K., “Torsional Behaviour of Normal- and High-Strength Concrete Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 101, No. 3, May-June 2004, pp. 304-313.

28. Hsu, T. T. C., “Torsion of Structural Concrete - Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Rectangular Members,” Torsion of Structural Concrete, SP-18, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1968, pp. 261-306.

29. Rasmussen, L. J., and Baker, G., “Torsion in Reinforced Normal and High-Strength Concrete Beams – Part 1: Experimental Test Series,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 92, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1995, pp. 56-62.

30. Peng, X. N., and Wong, Y. L., “Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Walls Subjected to Monotonic Pure Torsion – An Experimental Study,” Engineering Structures, V. 33, No. 9, 2011, pp. 2495-2508. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.04.022

31. MacGregor, J. G., “Safety and Limit States Design for Reinforced Concrete,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, V. 3, No. 4, 1976, pp. 484-513. doi: 10.1139/l76-055

32. Proestos, G. T.; Bae, G.-M.; Cho, J.-Y.; Bentz, E. C.; and Collins, M. P., “Influence of High-Strength Bars on Shear Responses of Containment Walls,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 113, No. 5, Sept. 2016, pp. 917-927. doi: 10.14359/51688750

33. Mitchell, D., and Collins, M. P., “Influence of Prestressing on Torsional Response of Concrete Beams,” Journal - Prestressed Concrete Institute, V. 23, No. 3, 1978, pp. 54-73. doi: 10.15554/pcij.05011978.54.73

34. Lampert, P., and Thürlimann, B., “Torsionsversuche an Stahlbetonbalken,” Bericht Nr. 6506-2, Institut fur Baustatik, ETH Zurich, Germany, Jan. 1968.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer