Numerical Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders Failing in Shear

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Numerical Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders Failing in Shear

Author(s): Shozab Mustafa, Eva O. L. Lantsoght, Yuguang Yang, and Henk Sliedrecht

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 119

Issue: 6

Appears on pages(s): 113-127

Keywords: bridge assessment; concrete bridges; finite element analysis; flexural shear; prestressed concrete; shear; shear-compression; shear-tension

DOI: 10.14359/51736109

Date: 11/1/2022

Abstract:
The safety of existing slab-between-girder bridges is subject to discussion in the Netherlands. Current design codes are conservative for shear-critical girders, and nonlinear finite element analysis is considered a more accurate assessment method. This paper investigates if the Dutch guidelines for nonlinear finite element analysis, which were largely based on laboratory experiments, can safely predict the behavior of large-scale shear-critical post-tensioned girders. The simulation results are compared with experimental observations on girders taken from a demolished bridge (the Helperzoom bridge) after serving for more than 50 years. Predicted and experimentally observed material properties are used as inputs for numerical models. For both, safe predictions of inclined cracking and ultimate capacities are obtained. Parameter studies for load positions and prestress levels are also performed to get a deeper insight into the structural behavior of such girders. This work shows that the guidelines can be used for assessment.

Related References:

Belletti, B.; Damoni, C.; den Uijl, J. A.; Hendriks, M. A. N.; and Walraven, J. C., 2013a, “Shear Resistance Evaluation of Prestressed Concrete Bridge Beams: fib Model Code 2010 Guidelines for Level IV Approximations,” Structural Concrete, V. 14, No. 3, Sept., pp. 242-249. doi: 10.1002/suco.201200046

Belletti, B.; Damoni, C.; Hendriks, M. A. N.; and den Uijl, J. A., 2013b, “Nonlinear Finite Element Analyses of Reinforced Concrete Slabs: Comparison of Safety Formats,” VIII International Conference on Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures (FraMCoS-8), J. G. M. Van Mier, G. Ruiz, C. Andrade, R. C. Yu, and X. X. Zhang, eds., 12 pp.

Bentz, E. C., 2000, “Sectional Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Members,” PhD thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Blomfors, M.; Engen, M.; and Plos, M., 2016, “Evaluation of Safety Formats for Non-Linear Finite Element Analyses of Statically Indeterminate Concrete Structures Subjected to Different Load Paths,” Structural Concrete, V. 17, No. 1, Mar., pp. 44-51. doi: 10.1002/suco.201500059

Collins, M. P.; Bentz, E. C.; Quach, P. T.; and Proestos, G. T., 2015, “The Challenge of Predicting the Shear Strength of Very Thick Slabs,” Concrete International, V. 37, No. 11, Nov., pp. 29-37.

de Boer, A.; Hendriks, M. A. N.; den Uijl, J. A.; Belletti, B.; and Damoni, C., 2014, “Nonlinear FEA Guideline for Modelling of Concrete Infrastructure Objects,” Computational Modelling of Concrete Structures: Proceedings of Euro-C 2014, St. Anton am Arlberg, Austria, 24-27 March 2014, N. Bićanić, H. Mang, G. Meschke, and R. de Borst, eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 977-985.

de Boer, A.; Hendriks, M. A. N.; van der Veen, C.; and Belletti, B., 2018, “Organizing an International Blind Prediction Contest for Improving a Guideline for the Nonlinear Finite Elements Analysis of Concrete Structures,” Computational Modelling of Concrete Structures: Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Modelling of Concrete and Concrete Structures (EURO-C 2018), February 26 - March 1, 2018, Bad Hofgastein, Austria, G. Meschke, B. Pichler, and J. Rots, eds., CRC Press, London, UK, pp. 545-552.

de Putter, A.; Hendriks, M. A. N.; Rots, J. G.; Yang, Y.; Engen, M.; and van den Bos, A. A., 2022, “Quantification of the Resistance Modeling Uncertainty of 19 Alternative 2D Nonlinear Finite Element Approaches Benchmarked against 101 Experiments on Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Structural Concrete, early access, 15 pp. doi: 10.1002/suco.202100574

DIANA FEA BV, 2017, “DIANA User’s Manual: Release 10.2,” Delft, the Netherlands.

Ensink, S. W. H.; van der Veen, C.; and Hendriks, M. A. N., 2019, “Non-Linear Analysis of Prestressed Concrete T-Beams,” Advances in Engineering Materials, Structures and Systems: Innovations, Mechanics and Applications: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation (SEMC 2019), September 2-4, 2019, Cape Town, South Africa, A. Zingoni, ed., CRC Press, London, UK, pp. 1360-1365.

Feenstra, P. H., 1993, “Computational Aspects of Biaxial Stress in Plain and Reinforced Concrete,” PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands, 159 pp.

fib, 2012, “Model Code 2010: Final Draft,” Fédération internationale du béton, Lausanne, Switzerland, 676 pp.

Hordijk, D. A., 1991, “Local Approach to Fatigue of Concrete,” PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands, 216 pp.

Jaeger, T., and Marti, P., 2009, “Reinforced Concrete Slab Shear Prediction Competition: Entries and Discussion,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 106, No. 3, May-June, pp. 309-318.

Lantsoght, E.; Zhang, F.; Garnica, G. Z.; Yang, Y.; and Braam, R., 2020, “Measurement Report of Prestressed Beams from Helperzoom Viaduct,” Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands, 75 pp.

Lantsoght, E. O. L.; Zarate, G.; Zhang, F.; Park, M.-K.; Yang, Y.; and Sliedrecht, H., 2021, “Shear Experiments of Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 118, No. 3, May, pp. 117-130.

Leonhardt, F.; Koch, R.; and Rostásy, F. S., 1973, “Schubversuche an Spannbetonträgern,” Ernst & Sohn GmbH, Berlin, Germany.

NEN-EN 1992-1-1+C2:2011, 2011, “Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures – Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 246 pp.

Park, M.-K.; Lantsoght, E. O. L.; Zarate Garnica, G. I.; Yang, Y.; and Sliedrecht, H., 2021, “Analysis of Shear Capacity of Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 118, No. 6, Nov., pp. 75-89.

Pimentel, M.; Brühwiler, E.; and Figueiras, J., 2014, “Safety Examination of Existing Concrete Structures Using the Global Resistance Safety Factor Concept,” Engineering Structures, V. 70, July, pp. 130-143. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.005

Rashid, Y. R., 1968, “Ultimate Strength Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Pressure Vessels,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, V. 7, No. 4, Apr., pp. 334-344.

Roosen, M. A., 2017, “Ontwerp Experiment Liggers Helperzoom,” Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands, 17 pp.

Rots, J. G., and Blaauwendraad, J., 1989, “Crack Models for Concrete: Discrete or Smeared? Fixed, Multi-Directional or Rotating?” Heron, V. 34, No. 1, pp. 1-59.

Rots, J. G.; Nauta, P.; Kuster, G. M. A.; and Blaauwendraad, J., 1985, “Smeared Crack Approach and Fracture Localization in Concrete,” Heron, V. 30, No. 1, pp. 1-48.

RTD 1006:2013, Version 1.1, 2013, “Guidelines for the Assessment Bridges - Assessment of Structural Safety of an Existing Bridge at Reconstruction, Usage and Disap­proval,” Rijkswaterstaat, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 117 pp. (in Dutch)

RTD 1016-1:2020, Version 2.2, 2020a, “Guidelines for Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures,” Rijkswaterstaat, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 66 pp.

RTD 1016-3A:2017, 2017a, “Validation of the Guidelines for Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures – Part 3A: Reinforced Beams,” Rijkswaterstaat, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 105 pp.

RTD 1016-3B:2017, 2017b, “Validation of the Guidelines for Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures – Part 3B: Pre-stressed Beams,” Rijkswaterstaat, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 113 pp.

RTD 1016-3C:2017, 2017c, “Validation of the Guidelines for Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures – Part 3C: Slabs,” Rijkswaterstaat, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 129 pp.

RTD 1016-3D:2020, Version 1.0, 2020b, “Validation of the Guidelines for Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Structures – Part 3D: Pre-Stressed Beams 2,” Rijkswaterstaat, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 109 pp.

Runzell, B.; Shield, C.; and French, C., 2007, “Shear Capacity of Prestressed Concrete Beams,” Report No. MN/RC 2007-47, Minnesota Department of Transportation Research Services Section, St. Paul, MN, 237 pp.

Schlune, H., 2011, “Safety Evaluation of Concrete Structures with Nonlinear Analysis,” PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 118 pp.

Schlune, H.; Plos, M.; and Gylltoft, K., 2011, “Safety Formats for Nonlinear Analysis Tested on Concrete Beams Subjected to Shear Forces and Bending Moments,” Engineering Structures, V. 33, No. 8, Aug., pp. 2350-2356. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.04.008

Sun, S., and Kuchma, D. A., 2007, “Shear Behavior and Capacity of Large-Scale Prestressed High-Strength Concrete Bulb-Tee Girders,” NSEL Report Series, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 147 pp.

Yang, Y.; de Boer, A.; and Hendriks, M. A. N., 2021, “A Contest on Modelling Shear Behaviour of Deep Concrete Slab Strips using Nonlinear FEM,” fib Symposium 2021: Concrete Structures: New Trends for Eco-Efficiency and Performance, Lisbon, Portugal, 10 pp.

Zwicky, D., 2002, “Zur Tragfähigkeit stark vorgespannter Betonbalken,” PhD thesis, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland, 236 pp. (in German)

Zwicky, D., and Vogel, T., 2000, “Bruchversuche an ausgebauten Brückenträgern aus Spannbeton,” ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland, 172 pp.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer