An Experimental Investigation on Workability and Bleeding Features

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: An Experimental Investigation on Workability and Bleeding Features

Author(s): Fatih Çelik, Andaç Batur Çolak, Og˘uzhan Yıldız, and Samet Müfit Bozkır

Publication: Materials Journal

Volume: 119

Issue: 5

Appears on pages(s): 63-76

Keywords: artificial neural network (ANN); bleeding; fly ash (FA); nano alumina; stability of grouts; workability of grouts

DOI: 10.14359/51735949

Date: 9/1/2022

Abstract:
In this experimental study, the workability and bleeding properties of cement-based grout mixtures combined with fly ash (FA) and colloidal nanopowder (n-Al2O3) were investigated, and some prediction models were developed with an artificial neural network (ANN). Marsh cone flow time, mini-slump spreading diameter, and Lombardi plate cohesion of the grout samples were measured based on the workability test. Test results showed that the use of FA as mineral additive in the grout samples positively contributed to an increase of the fluidity of the grout samples as expected. Considerable effects were observed on workability features of grout mixtures with the addition of nano alumina because of having a large specific surface area. In addition, the use of nano alumina together with FA in grout mixtures contributes to the stability of these mixtures by looking at changes in bleeding values. Using the experimental data obtained, an ANN model was developed to predict the values of Marsh cone flow time, mini-slump spreading diameter, and plate cohesion. The developed ANN model can predict mini-slump spreading diameter with an error rate of –0.04%, Marsh cone flow time value with an error rate of –0.23%, and plate cohesion value with an error rate of –1.07%.

Related References:

1. Peng, Y.; Ma, K.; Long, G.; and Xie, Y., “Influence of Nano-SiO2, Nano-CaCO3 and Nano-Al2O3 on Rheological Properties of Cement–Fly Ash Paste,” Materials (Basel), V. 12, No. 16, 2019, p. 2598. doi: 10.3390/ma12162598

2. Rashad, A. M., “A Synopsis about the Effect of Nano-Al2O3, Nano-Fe2O3, Nano-Fe3O4 and Nano-Clay on Some Properties of Cementitious Materials—A Short Guide for Civil Engineer,” Materials & Design, V. 52, 2013, pp. 143-157. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.035

3. Song, S. Q.; Jiang, L. H.; Jiang, S. B.; Yan, X. C.; and Xu, N., “The Mechanical Properties and Electrochemical Behavior of Cement Paste Containing Nano-MgO at Different Curing Temperature,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 164, 2018, pp. 663-671. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.011

4. Singh, L. P.; Bhattacharyya, S. K.; and Ahalawat, S., “Preparation of Size Controlled Silica Nano Particles and Its Functional Role in Cementitious System,” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, V. 10, No. 11, 2012, pp. 345-352. doi: 10.3151/jact.10.345

5. Madani, H.; Bagheri, A.; and Parhizkar, T., “The Pozzolanic ReactivityoOf Monodispersed Nanosilica Hydrosols and Their Influence on the Hydration Characteristics of Portland Cement,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 42, No. 12, 2012, pp. 1563-1570. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.09.004

6. Bjornstrom, J.; Martinelli, A.; Matic, A.; Borjesson, L.; and Panas, I., “Accelerating Effects of Colloidal Nano-Silica for Beneficial Calcium-Silicate-Hydrate Formation in Cement,” Chemical Physics Letters, V. 392, No. 1-3, 2004, pp. 242-324. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.05.071

7. Nazari, A., and Riahi, S., “The Effects of SiO2 Nanoparticles on Physical and Mechanical Properties of High Strength Compacting Concrete,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 42, 2011, pp. 570-578.

8. Hou, P. K.; Kawashima, S.; Kong, D. Y.; Corr, D. J.; Qian, J. S.; and Shah, S. P., “Modification Effects of Colloidal Nano SiO2 on Cement Hydration and Its Gel Property,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 45, 2013, pp. 440-448.

9. Zabihi, N., and Ozkul, M. H., “The Fresh Properties of Nano Silica Incorporating Polymer-Modified Cement Pastes,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 168, 2018, pp. 570-579. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.084

10. Balapour, M.; Joshaghani, A.; and Althoey, F., “Nano-SiO2 Contribution to Mechanical, Durability, Fresh and Microstructural Characteristics of Concrete: A Review,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 181, 2018, pp. 27-41. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.266

11. Ouyang, J.; Han, B. G.; Chen, G. Z.; Zhao, L. Z.; and Ou, J. P., “A Viscosity Prediction Model for Cement Paste with Nano-SiO2 Particles,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 185, 2018, pp. 293-301. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.070

12. Collepardi, S.; Borsoi, A.; Olagot, J. J. O.; Troli, R.; Collepardi, M.; and Cursio, A. Q., “Influence of Nano-sized Mineral Additions on Performance of SCC,” Proceedings of the 6th International Congress, Global Construction, Ultimate Concrete Opportunities, Dundee, Scotland, July 5-7, 2005.

13. Oltulu, M., and Sahin, R., “Effect of Nano-SiO2, Nano-Al2O3 And Nano-Fe2O3 Powders on Compressive Strengths and Capillary Water Absorption of Cement Mortar Containing Fly Ash: A Comparative Study,” Energy and Building, V. 58, 2013, pp. 292-301. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.12.014

14. Liu, X. Y.; Chen, L.; Liu, A. H.; and Wang, X. R., “Effect of Nano-CaCO3 on Properties of Cement Paste,” Energy Procedia, V. 16, 2012, pp. 991-996. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.01.158

15. Meng, W., and Khayat, K. H., “Effect of Graphite Nanoplatelets and Carbon Nanofibers on Rheology, Hydration, Shrinkage, Mechanical Properties, and Microstructure of UHPC,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 105, 2018, pp. 64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.01.001

16. Metaxa, Z. S.; Konsta-Gdoutos, M.; and Shah, S. P., “Carbon Nanofiber-Reinforced Cement-Based Materials,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, V. 2142, No. 1, 2010, pp. 114-118. doi: 10.3141/2142-17

17. Kirgiz, M. S., “Advance Treatment by Nanographite for Portland Pulverised Fly Ash Cement (The Class F) Systems,” Composites Part B, V. 82, 2015, pp. 59-71. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.003

18. Konsta-Gdoutos, M. S.; Metaxa, Z. S.; and Shah, S. P., “Highly Dispersed Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Cement-Based Materials,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 40, No. 7, 2010, pp. 1052-1059. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.02.015

19. Peyvandi, A.; Soroushian, P.; Abdol, N.; and Balachandra, A. M., “Surface-Modified Graphite Nanomaterials for Improved Reinforcement Efficiency in Cementitious Paste,” Carbon, V. 63, 2013, pp. 175-186. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.06.069

20. Woodward, R. J., and Miller, E., “Grouting Post-Tensioned Concrete Bridges: The Prevention of Voids,” Highways and Transportation, V. 37, No. 6, 1990, pp. 9-17.

21. Moseley, M. P., Ground Improvement, Blackie Academic and Professional, Florida, 1993.

22. Cry, M.; Legrand, C.; and Mouret, M., “Study of the Shear Thickening Effect of Superplasticizers on the Rheological Behaviour of Cement Pastes Containing or not Mineral Additives,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 30, No. 9, 2000, pp. 1477-1483. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00330-6

23. Celik, F., and Canakci, H., “An Investigation of Rheological Properties of Cement-Based Grout Mixed with Rice Husk Ash (RHA),” Construction and Building Materials, V. 91, 2015, pp. 187-194. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.025

24. Sonebi, M.; Bassuoni, M. T.; Kwasny, J.; and Amanuddin, A. K., “Effect of Nanosilica on Rheology, Fresh Properties, and Strength of Cement-Based Grouts,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, 2014, pp. 04014145. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001080

25. Celik, F., and Akcuru, O., “Rheological and Workability Effects of Bottom Ash Usage as a Mineral Additive on the Cement-Based Permeation Grouting Method,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 263, 2020, p. 120186. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120186

26. Sonebi, M., “Rheological Properties of Grouts with Viscosity Modifying Agents as Diutan Gum and Welan Gum Incorporating Pulverised Fly Ash,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 36, No. 9, 2006, pp. 1609-1618. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.05.016

27. Yamamoto, Y., and Kobayashi, S., “Effect of Temperature on the Properties of Superplasticized Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 83, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1986, pp. 80-87.

28. Golaszewki, J., and Szwabowski, J., “Influence of Superplasticizer on Rheological Behaviour of Fresh Cement Mortars,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 34, No. 2, 2004, pp. 235-248. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.07.002

29. Jolicoeur, C.; Sharman, J.; Otis, N.; Lebel, A.; Simard, M. A.; and Page, M., “The Influence of Temperature on the Rheological Properties of Superplasticized Cement Pastes,” Proceedings, 5th CANMET/ACI International Conference on Superplasticizers and Other Chemical Admixtures in Concrete, SP-173, V. M. Malhotra, ed., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1997, pp. 379-415.

30. Petit, J. Y.; Wirquin, E.; and Duthoit, B., “Influence of Temperature on the Yield Value of Highly Flowable Micromortars Made with Sulfonate-Based Superplasticizer,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 35, No. 2, 2005, pp. 256-266. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.025

31. Petit, J. Y.; Khayat, K.; and Wirquin, E., “Coupled Effect of Time and Temperature on Variations of Yield Value of Highly Flowable Mortar,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 39, No. 3, 2009, pp. 165-170. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.12.007

32. Sonebi, M.; Lachemi, M.; and Hossain, K. M. A., “Optimisation of Rheological Parameters and Mechanical Properties of Superplasticised Cement Grouts Containing Metakaolin and Viscosity Modifying Admixture,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 38, No. 1, 2013, pp. 126-138. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.102

33. Sonebi, M., “Optimization of Cement Grouts Containing Silica Fume and Viscosity Modifying Admixture,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 22, No. 4, 2010, pp. 332-342. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000026

34. Celik, F., “The Observation of Permeation Grouting Method as Soil Improvement Technique with Different Grout Flow Models,” Geomechanics and Engineering, V. 17, No. 4, 2019, pp. 367-374.

35. Sonebi, M., “Experimental Design to Optimize High-Volume of Fly Ash Grout in the Presence of Welan Gum and Super Plasticizer,” Materials and Structures, V. 35, No. 250, 2002, pp. 373-380. doi: 10.1617/13752

36. Vakili, M.; Khosrojerdi, S.; Aghajannezhad, P.; and Yahyaei, M., “A Hybrid Artificial Neural Network-Genetic Algorithm Modeling Approach for Viscosity Estimation of Graphene Nanoplatelets Nanofluid Using Experimental Data,” International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, V. 82, 2017, pp. 40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2017.02.003

37. Çolak, A. B.; Akçaözoğlu, K.; Akçaözoğlu, S.; and Beller, G., “Artificial Intelligence Approach in Predicting the Effect of Elevated Temperature on the Mechanical Properties of PET Aggregate Mortars: An Experimental Study,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s13369-020-05280-1

38. Sivasankaran, S.; Narayanasamy, R.; Ramesh, T.; and Prabhakar, M., “Analysis of Workability Behavior of Al–Sic P/M Composites Using Backpropagation Neural Network Model and Statistical Technique,” Computational Materials Science, V. 47, No. 1, 2009, pp. 46-59. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.06.013

39. Bai, J.; Wild, S.; Ware, J. A.; and Sabir, B. B., “Using Neural Networks to Predict Workability of Concrete Incorporating Metakaolin and Fly Ash,” Advances in Engineering Software, V. 34, No. 11-12, 2003, pp. 663-669. doi: 10.1016/S0965-9978(03)00102-9

40. Çolak, A. B., “A Novel Comparative Analysis between the Experimental and Numeric Methods on Viscosity of Zirconium Oxide Nanofluid: Developing Optimal Artificial Neural Network and New Mathematical Model,” Powder Technology, V. 381, 2021, pp. 338-351. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.12.053

41. Habeeb, G. A., and Fayyadh, M. M., “Rice Husk Ash Concrete: The Effect of RHA Average Particle Size on Mechanical Properties and Drying Shrinkage,” Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, V. 3, No. 3, 2009, pp. 1616-1622.

42. Kantro, D. L., “Influence of Water Reducing Admixtures on Properties of Cement Paste: A Miniature Slump Test,” Cement, Concrete and Aggregates, V. 2, No. 2, 1980, pp. 95-102. doi: 10.1520/CCA10190J

43. Weaver, K., Dam Foundation Grouting, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 1991.

44. Kauschınger, L. J.; Perry, E. R.; and Hankour, R., “Methods to Estimate Composition of Jet Grout Bodies,” Geo-congress New Orleans, Louisiana, Geotechnical Special Publication 30, 1992, pp. 194-205.

45. Celik, F., and Canakci, H., “Examination of the Mechanical Properties and Failure Pattern of Soilcrete Mixtures Modified with Rice Husk Ash,” European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, V. 24, No. 8, 2018, pp. 1245-1260. doi: 10.1080/19648189.2018.1458656

46. Ariana, M. A.; Vaferi, B.; and Karimi, G., “Prediction of Thermal Conductivity of Alumina Water-Based Nanofluids by Artificial Neural Networks,” Powder Technology, V. 278, 2015, pp. 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2015.03.005

47. Esfe, M. H., and Tilebon, S. M. S., “Statistical and Artificial Based Optimization on Thermo-Physical Properties of an Oil Based Hybrid Nanofluid Using NSGA-II and RSM,” Physica A, V. 537, 2020, pp. 122-126. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.122126

48. Bonakdari, H., and Zaji, A. H., “Open Channel Junction Velocity Prediction by Using a Hybrid Self-Neuron Adjustable Artificial Neural Network,” Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, V. 49, 2016, pp. 46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2016.04.003

49. Çolak, A. B., “Developing Optimal Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to Predict the Specific Heat of Water Based Yttrium Oxide (Y2O3) Nanofluid According to the Experimental Data and Proposing New Correlation,” Heat Transfer Research, V. 51, No. 17, 2020, pp. 1565-1586. doi: 10.1615/HeatTransRes.2020034724

50. Çolak, A. B., “An Experimental Study on the Comparative Analysis of the Effect of the Number of Data on the Error Rates of Artificial Neural Networks,” International Journal of Energy Research, V. 45, No. 1, 2021, pp. 478-500. doi: 10.1002/er.5680

51. Esmaeilzadeh, F.; Teja, A. S.; and Bakhtyari, A., “The Thermal Conductivity, Viscosity, and Cloud Points of Bentonite Nanofluids with N-Pentadecane as the Base Fluid,” Journal of Molecular Liquids, V. 300, 2020, p. 112307 doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.112307

52. Barati-Harooni, A., and Najafi-Marghmaleki, A., “An Accurate RBF-NN Model for Estimation of Viscosity of Nanofluids,” Journal of Molecular Liquids, V. 224, 2016, pp. 580-588. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.10.049

53. Rostamian, S. H.; Biglari, M.; Saedodin, S.; and Esfe, M. H., “An Inspection of Thermal Conductivity of CuO-SWCNTs Hybrid Nanofluid versus Temperature and Concentration Using Experimental Data, ANN Modeling and New Correlation,” Journal of Molecular Liquids, V. 231, 2017, pp. 364-369. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.02.015

54. Ali, A.; Abdulrahman, A.; Garg, S.; Maqsood, K.; and Murshid, G., “Application of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) for Vapor-Liquid-Solid Equilibrium Prediction for CH4-CO2 Binary Mixture,” Greenhouse Gases (Chichester, UK), V. 9, No. 1, 2019, pp. 67-78. doi: 10.1002/ghg.1833

55. Çolak, A. B., “Experimental Study for Thermal Conductivity of Water-Based Zirconium Oxide Nanofluid: Developing Optimal Artificial Neural Network and Proposing New Correlation,” International Journal of Energy Research, V. 45, No. 2, 2020, pp. 2912-2930. doi: 10.1002/er.5988

56. Abdul Kareem, F. A.; Shariff, A. M.; Ullah, S.; Garg, S.; Dreisbach, F.; Keong, L. K.; and Mellon, N., “Experimental and Neural Network Modeling of Partial Uptake for a Carbon Dioxide/Methane/Water Ternary Mixture on 13X Zeolite,” Energy Technology (Weinheim), V. 5, No. 8, 2017, pp. 1373-1391. doi: 10.1002/ente.201600688

57. Vafaei, M.; Afrand, M.; Sina, N.; Kalbasi, R.; Sourani, F.; and Teimouri, H., “Evaluation of Thermal Conductivity of MgO-MWCNTs/EG Hybrid Nanofluids Based on Experimental Data by Selecting Optimal Artificial Neural Networks,” Physica E, Low-Dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, V. 85, 2017, pp. 90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.physe.2016.08.020

58. Akhgar, A., “Developing Dissimilar Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) to Prediction the Thermal Conductivity of MWCNT-TiO2/Water-ethylene Glycol Hybrid Nanofluid,” Powder Technology, V. 355, 2019, pp. 602-610. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.07.086

59. Çolak, A. B.; Güzel, T.; Yıldız, O.; and Özer, M., “An Experimental Study on Determination of the Shottky Diode Current-Voltage Characteristic Depending on Temperature with Artificial Neural Network,” Physica B, Condensed Matter, V. 608, 2021, p. 412852. doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2021.412852

60. Senff, L.; Labrincha, J. A.; Ferreira, V. M.; Hotza, D.; and Repette, W. L., “Effect of Nano-Silica on Rheology and Fresh Properties of Cement Pastes and Mortars,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 23, No. 7, 2009, pp. 2487-2491. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.005

61. Deere, D. U., “Cement-Bentonite Grouting for Dams,” Proceedings of ASCE Specialty Conference on Grouting in Geotechnical Engineering, New Orleans, LA, 1982, pp. 279-300


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Materials Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer