Title:
Effect of Magnesia on Stabilization of Contaminated Clay Soil
Author(s):
A. R. Estabragh, F. Jandari, A. A. Javadi, and M. Amini
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
119
Issue:
3
Appears on pages(s):
103-113
Keywords:
carbonation; curing time; magnesia; soil stabilization; strength
DOI:
10.14359/51734605
Date:
5/1/2022
Abstract:
In this study, the effect of magnesia (MgO) on the stabilization of a clay soil contaminated with glycerol was investigated through a series of experiments. The tests were performed in two groups. In the first group, the natural soil was mixed with 5, 8, and 12% MgO. A set of tests, including unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests, were conducted on samples prepared at curing times of 7, 14, and 28 days. In addition, a number of samples prepared with different percentages of MgO were subjected to CO2 under a pressure of 0.5 bar for periods of 4, 8, and 24 hours. In the second group, the soil was contaminated with 4, 8, and 12% glycerol and was then mixed with 5, 8, and 12% MgO. A group of tests, similar to the first group, were conducted on the contaminated samples. The results showed that adding MgO to the natural soil and the contaminated soil increases the strength of the soil, and the amount of increase in strength depends on the percentage of MgO and the curing time. During stabilization, the contaminated soil with 8 and 12% glycerol gained more strength than the natural soil. The results also indicated that forced carbonation can facilitate the stabilization of MgO-stabilized natural and contaminated soils in a few hours compared with conventional methods that take several days. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results showed that the gained strength for both groups resulted from the interaction between the soil and MgO.
Related References:
1. Bell, F. G., Engineering Properties of Soils and Rocks, second edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 1983, 158 pp.
2. Al-Taie, A.; Disfani, M.; Evans, R.; Arulrajah, A.; and Horpibulsuk, S., “Volumetric Behavior and Soil Water Characteristic Curve of Untreated and Lime-Stabilized Reactive Clay,” International Journal of Geomechanics, ASCE, V. 19, No. 2, Feb. 2019, p. 04018192. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001336
3. Al-Taie, A.; Disfani, M.; Evans, R.; and Arulrajah, A., “Effect of Swell–Shrink Cycles on Volumetric Behavior of Compacted Expansive Clay Stabilized Using Lime,” International Journal of Geomechanics, ASCE, V. 20, No. 11, Nov. 2020, p. 04020212. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001863
4. Bell, F. G., “Lime Stabilization of Clay Minerals and Soil,” Engineering Geology, V. 42, No. 4, July 1996, pp. 223-237. doi: 10.1016/0013-7952(96)00028-2
5. Chew, S. H.; Kamruzzaman, A. H. M.; and Lee, F. H., “Physicochemical and Engineering Behavior of Cement Treated Clays,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, V. 130, No. 7, July 2004, pp. 696-706. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:7(696)
6. Estabragh, A. R.; Khatibi, M.; and Javadi, A. A., “Effect of Cement on Treatment of a Clay Soil Contaminated with Glycerol,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 28, No. 4, Apr. 2016, p. 04015157. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001443
7. Ranaivomanana, H.; Razakamanantsoa, A.; and Amiri, O., “Effects of Cement Treatment on Microstructural, Hydraulic, and Mechanical Properties of Compacted Soils: Characterization and Modeling,” International Journal of Geomechanics, ASCE, V. 18, No. 9, Sept. 2018, p. 04018106. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001248
8. Das, M., and Dey, A. K., “Use of Soil–Cement Bed to Improve Bearing Capacity of Stone Columns,” International Journal of Geomechanics, ASCE, V. 20, No. 6, June 2020, p. 06020008. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001655
9. Harrison, A. J. W., “Reactive Magnesium Oxide Cements,” International Patent No. WO/2001/055049, 2001.
10. Al-Tabbaa, A., Eco-Efficient Concrete: 19. Reactive Magnesia Cement, F. Pacheco-Torgal, S. Jalali, J. Labrincha, and V. M. John, eds., Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, UK, 2013.
11. Olajire, A. A., “A Review of Mineral Carbonation Technology in Sequestration of CO2,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, V. 109, Sept. 2013, pp. 364-392. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2013.03.013
12. Unluer, C., and Al-Tabbaa, A., “Impact of Hydrated Magnesium Carbonate Additives on the Carbonation of Reactive MgO Cements,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 54, Dec. 2013, pp. 87-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.08.009
13. Liska, M.; Vandeperre, L. J.; and Al-Tabbaa, A., “Influence of Carbonation on the Properties of Reactive Magnesia Cement-Based Pressed Masonry Units,” Advances in Cement Research, V. 20, No. 2, Apr. 2008, pp. 53-64. doi: 10.1680/adcr.2008.20.2.53
14. Vandeperre, L. J.; Liska, M.; and Al-Tabbaa, A., “Microstructures of Reactive Magnesia Cement Blends,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 30, No. 8, Sept. 2008, pp. 706-714. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.05.002
15. Vandeperre, L. J.; Liska, M.; and Al-Tabbaa, A., “Hydration and Mechanical Properties of Magnesia, Pulverized Fuel Ash, and Portland Cement Blends,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 20, No. 5, May 2008, pp. 375-383. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:5(375)
16. Liska, M., and Al-Tabbaa, A., “Ultra-Green Construction: Reactive Magnesia Masonry Products,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Waste and Resource Management, V. 162, No. 4, Nov. 2009 pp. 185-196.
17. Yi, Y.; Liska, M.; Akinyugha, A.; Unluer, C.; and Al-Tabbaa, A., “Preliminary Laboratory-Scale Model Auger Installation and Testing of Carbonated Soil-MgO Columns,” Geotechnical Testing Journal, V. 36, No. 3, 2013, pp. 384-393. doi: 10.1520/GTJ20120052
18. Yi, Y.; Liska, M.; Unluer, C.; and Al-Tabbaa, A., “Carbonating Magnesia for Soil Stabilization,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, V. 50, No. 8, Aug. 2013, pp. 899-905. doi: 10.1139/cgj-2012-0364
19. Yi, Y.; Lu, K.; Liu, S.; and Al-Tabbaa, A., “Property Changes of Reactive Magnesia–Stabilized Soil Subjected to Forced Carbonation,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, V. 53, No. 2, Feb. 2016, pp. 314-325. doi: 10.1139/cgj-2015-0135
20. Estabragh, A. R.; Khajepour, H.; Javadi, A. A.; and Amini, M., “Effect of Forced Carbonation on the Behaviour of a Magnesia-Stabilised Clay Soil,” International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2020, 15 pp.
21. Tuncan, A.; Tuncan, M.; and Koyuncu, H., “Use of Petroleum-Contaminated Drilling Wastes as Sub-Base Material for Road Construction,” Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, V. 18, No. 5, Oct. 2000, pp. 489-505. doi: 10.1177/0734242X0001800511
22. Hassan, H. F.; Taha, R.; Al Rawas, A.; Al Shandoudi, B.; Al Gheithi, K.; and Al Barami, A. M., “Potential Uses of Petroleum-Contaminated Soil in Highway Construction,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 19, No. 8, Oct. 2005, pp. 646-652. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.001
23. Estabragh, A. R.; Khatibi, M.; and Javadi, A. A., “Effect of Cement on Mechanical Behavior of Soil Contaminated with Monoethylene Glycol (MEG),” ACI Materials Journal V. 113, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2016, pp. 709-717. doi: 10.14359/51689236
24. Wang, F.; Jin, F.; Shen, Z.; and Al-Tabbaa, A., “Three-Year Performance of In-Situ Mass Stabilised Contaminated Site Soils Using MgO-Bearing Binders,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, V. 318, Nov. 2016, pp. 302-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.07.018
25. Li, W., and Yi, Y., “Stabilization/Solidification of Lead- and Zinc-Contaminated Soils Using MgO and CO2,” Journal of CO2 Utilization, V. 33, Oct. 2019, pp. 215-221.
26. Fang, H.-Y., Introduction to Environmental Geotechnology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1997.
27. Estabragh, A. R.; Ranjbari, S.; and Javadi, A. A., “Properties of Clay Soil and Soil Cement Reinforced with Polypropylene Fibers,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 114, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2017, pp. 195-205. doi: 10.14359/51689469
28. Cernica, J. N., Geotechnical Engineering: Soil Mechanics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 1995.
29. Mitchell, J. K., and Soga, K., Fundamentals of Soil Behavior, third edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2005.
30. Singh, S. K.; Srivastava, R. K.; and John, S., “Studies on Soil Contamination due to Used Motor Oil and Its Remediation,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, V. 46, No. 9, Sept. 2009, pp. 1077-1083. doi: 10.1139/T09-047
31. Estabragh, A. R.; Afsari, E.; Javadi, A. A.; and Babalar, M., “Effect of Two Organic Chemical Fluids on the Mechanical Properties of an Expansive Clay Soil,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, V. 48, No. 5, 2018, 14 pp.
32. Ratnaweera, P., and Meegoda, J. N., “Shear Strength and Stress-Strain Behavior of Contaminated Soils,” Geotechnical Testing Journal, V. 29, No. 2, 2006, pp. 133-140.
33. Vandeperre, L. J.; Liska, M.; and Al-Tabbaa, A., “Mixtures of Pulverized Fuel Ash, Portland Cement and Magnesium Oxide: Strength Evolution and Hydration Products,” Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Science and Engineering of Recycling for Environmental Protection, Engineering Academy of Yugoslavia, Belgrade, Serbia, 2006, pp. 539-550.
34. Unluer, C., and Al-Tabbaa, A., “Green Construction with Carbonating Reactive Magnesia Porous Blocks: Effect of Cement and Water Contents,” Proceedings of Future Concrete 2011: Second International Conference & the Environmental Construction Exhibition, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2011, 11 pp.
35. Unluer, C., and Al-Tabbaa, A., “Effect of Aggregate Size Distribution on the Carbonation of Reactive Magnesia Based Porous Blocks,” Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Sustainable Development Research Conference, Hull, UK, 2012, 16 pp.
36. Yi, Y.; Lu, K.; Liu, S.; and Al-Tabbaa, A., “Property Changes of Reactive Magnesia–Stabilized Soil Subjected to Forced Carbonation,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, V. 53, No. 2, Feb. 2016, pp. 314-325. doi: 10.1139/cgj-2015-0135