Linking Solids Content and Flow Properties of Mortars to their Three-Dimensional Printing Characteristics

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Linking Solids Content and Flow Properties of Mortars to their Three-Dimensional Printing Characteristics

Author(s): Fabian B. Rodriguez, Jan Olek, Reza Moini, Pablo D. Zavattieri, and Jeffrey P. Youngblood

Publication: Materials Journal

Volume: 118

Issue: 6

Appears on pages(s): 371-382

Keywords: buildability; dimensional stability; flow; fresh-state properties; mortar; print quality; solids content; three-dimensional (3D) printing; vertical and horizontal deformations

DOI: 10.14359/51733136

Date: 11/1/2021

Abstract:
Layer-by-layer additive manufacturing (AM) of cement-based elements requires an understanding of the fresh-state characteristics of the materials. The focus of this work was on linking the flow properties and solids content of mortars with their three-dimensional (3D) printing characteristics (printability, buildability, and dimensional stability of multilayer elements). In the initial stages of the study, the analysis of the combined effects of solids content and flow characteristics of mortars helped to identify the boundaries of a printable/buildable zone for the 3D-printing system with the 4.0 mm diameter nozzle used in the study. The mortars that were located inside the printable/buildable zone were subsequently used to 3D print multilayer prismatic elements. The quality of printed elements was assessed by quantifying their dimensional stability. Elements with vertical deformations lower than 5% were classified as high-quality type, whereas those with deformations between 5 and 10% were classified as good-quality type. The findings of the research indicate that to produce acceptable quality elements while using a 3D-printing system with a 4.0 mm diameter nozzle, the solids content of mortars should be in the range of 60 to 70% and their flow values should be in the range of 90 to 160%. These findings were further expanded upon by comparing them with literature-based information on the extent of the printable/buildable zone for mixtures with a wide range of solids contents that were 3D-printed with larger nozzles. Such information is important with respect to the ability to convert mortar mixtures used in the current study to concrete mixtures for use with larger-scale 3D-printing systems.

Related References:

1. Buswell, R. A.; Leal de Silva, W. R.; Jones, S. Z.; and Dirrenberger, J., “3D Printing Using Concrete Extrusion: A Roadmap for Research,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 112, Oct. 2018, pp. 37-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.006

2. Bos, F.; Wolfs, R.; Ahmed, Z.; and Salet, T., “Additive Manufacturing of Concrete in Construction: Potentials and Challenges of 3D Concrete Printing,” Virtual and Physical Prototyping, V. 11, No. 3, 2016, pp. 209-225. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867

3. Nerella, V. N., and Mechtcherine, V., “Studying the Printability of Fresh Concrete for Formwork-Free Concrete Onsite 3D Printing Technology (CONPrint3D),” 3D Concrete Printing Technology, V. 1, J. G. Sanjayan, A. Nazari, and B. Nematollahi, eds., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2019, pp. 333-347. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-815481-6.00016-6

4. Roussel, N., “Rheological Requirements for Printable Concretes,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 112, Oct. 2018, pp. 76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.005

5. Wangler, T.; Lloret, E.; Reiter, L.; Hack, N.; Gramazio, F.; Kohler, M.; Bernhard, M.; Dillenburger, B.; Buchli, J.; Roussel, N.; and Flatt, R., “Digital Concrete: Opportunities and Challenges,” RILEM Technical Letters, V. 1, Oct. 2016, pp. 67-75. doi: 10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.16

6. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; She, W.; Yang, L.; Liu, G.; and Yang, Y., “Rheological and Harden Properties of the High-Thixotropy 3D Printing Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 201, Mar. 2019, pp. 278-285. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.061

7. Moini, M., “Buildability and Mechanical Performance of Architectured Cement-Based Materials Fabricated Using a Direct-Ink-Writing Process,” PhD dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 2020, 157 pp.

8. Wolfs, R. J. M., and Suiker, A. S. J., “Structural Failure during Extrusion-Based 3D Printing Processes,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, V. 104, No. 1-4, 2019, pp. 565-584. doi: 10.1007/s00170-019-03844-6

9. Liu, Z.; Li, M.; Weng, Y.; Wong, T. N.; and Tan, M. J., “Mixture Design Approach to Optimize the Rheological Properties of the Material Used in 3D Cementitious Material Printing,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 198, Feb. 2019, pp. 245-255. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.252

10. Tay, Y. W. D.; Qian, Y.; and Tan, M. J., “Printability Region for 3D Concrete Printing Using Slump and Slump Flow Test,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 174, Oct. 2019, Article 106968. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106968

11. Ashrafi, N.; Duarte, J. P.; Nazarian, S.; and Meisel, N. A., “Evaluating the Relationship between Deposition and Layer Quality in Large-Scale Additive Manufacturing of Concrete,” Virtual and Physical Prototyping, V. 14, No. 2, 2019, pp. 135-140. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2018.1532800

12. Van Der Putten, J.; De Schutter, G.; and Van Tittelboom, K., “Surface Modification as a Technique to Improve Inter-Layer Bonding Strength in 3D Printed Cementitious Materials,” RILEM Technical Letters, V. 4, July 2019, pp. 33-38. doi: 10.21809/rilemtechlett.2019.84

13. Panda, B., and Tan, M. J., “Experimental Study on Mix Proportion and Fresh Properties of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer for 3D Concrete Printing,” Ceramics International, V. 44, No. 9, 2018, pp. 10258-10265. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.031

14. Dedenis, M.; Sonebi, M.; Amziane, S.; Perrot, A.; and Amato, G., “Effect of Metakaolin, Fly Ash and Polypropylene Fibres on Fresh and Rheological Properties of 3D Printing Based Cement Materials,” Second RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication: Digital Concrete 2020, RILEM Bookseries, V. 28, F. Bos, S. Lucas, R. Wolfs, and T. Salet, eds., Springer, Cham, Switzeralnd, 2020, pp. 206-215. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-49916-7_21

15. Kazemian, A.; Yuan, X.; Cochran, E.; and Khoshnevis, B., “Cementitious Materials for Construction-Scale 3D Printing: Laboratory Testing of Fresh Printing Mixture,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 145, Aug. 2017, pp. 639-647. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.015

16. Rubio, M.; Sonebi, M.; and Amziane, S., “Fresh and Rheological Properties of 3D Printing Bio-Cement-Based Materials,” Proceedings, Second International Conference on Bio-Based Building Materials (ICBBM 2017), V. 35, No. 2, Clermont-Ferrand, France, 2017, 9 pp.

17. Le, T. T.; Austin, S. A.; Lim, S.; Buswell, R. A.; Gibb, A. G. F.; and Thorpe, T., “Mix Design and Fresh Properties for High-Performance Printing Concrete,” Materials and Structures, V. 45, No. 8, 2012, pp. 1221-1232. doi: 10.1617/s11527-012-9828-z

18. Bong, S. H.; Nematollahi, B.; Nazari, A.; Xia, M.; and Sanjayan, J. G., “Fresh and Hardened Properties of 3D Printable Geopolymer Cured in Ambient Temperature,” First RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication - Digital Concrete 2018, RILEM Bookseries, V. 19, T. Wangler and R. Flatt, eds., Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2019, pp. 3-11. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-99519-9_1

19. Xia, M., and Sanjayan, J., “Method of Formulating Geopolymer for 3D Printing for Construction Applications,” Materials & Design, V. 110, 2016, pp. 382-390. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.136

20. Ketel, S.; Falzone, G.; Wang, B.; Washburn, N.; and Sant, G., “A Printability Index for Linking Slurry Rheology to the Geometrical Attributes of 3D-Printed Components,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 101, 2019, pp. 32-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.03.022

21. Panda, B.; Unluer, C.; and Tan, M. J., “Extrusion and Rheology Characterization of Geopolymer Nanocomposites Used in 3D Printing,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 176, Nov. 2019, p. 107290. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107290

22. Carneau, P.; Mesnil, R.; Ducoulombier, N.; Roussel, N.; and Baverel, O., “Characterisation of the Layer Pressing Strategy for Concrete 3D Printing,” Second RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication: Digital Concrete 2020, RILEM Bookseries, V. 28, F. Bos, S. Lucas, R. Wolfs, and T. Salet, eds., Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2020, pp. 185-195. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-49916-7_19

23. ASTM C150/C150M-20, “Standard Specification for Portland Cement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020, 9 pp.

24. ASTM C778-17, “Specification for Standard Sand,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, 3 pp.

25. ASTM C494/C494M-19, “Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019, 15 pp.

26. Moini, M.; Olek, J.; Magee, B.; Zavattieri, P.; and Youngblood, J., “Additive Manufacturing and Characterization of Architectured Cement-Based Materials via X-ray Micro-Computed Tomography,” First RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication - Digital Concrete 2018, RILEM Bookseries, V. 19, T. Wangler and R. Flatt, eds., Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2019, pp. 176-189. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-99519-9_16

27. Moini, M.; Olek, J.; Youngblood, J. P.; Magee, B.; and Zavattieri, P. D., “Additive Manufacturing and Performance of Architectured Cement-Based Materials,” Advanced Materials, V. 30, No. 43, 2018, pp. 1-11. doi: 10.1002/adma.201802123

28. ASTM C1437-15, “Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, 2 pp.

29. Draijer, W. M., “Assessing the Pumpability of Concrete with the Slump and Pressure Bleeding Test: Research on Suitable Test Methods for Assessing the Pumpability of Concrete,” University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands, 2007, 49 pp., https://essay.utwente.nl/68467/1/Draijer-Wessel.pdf. (last accessed Oct. 20, 2021)

30. Toutou, Z.; Roussel, N.; and Lanos, C., “The Squeezing Test: A Tool to Identify Firm Cement-Based Material’s Rheological Behaviour and Evaluate Their Extrusion Ability,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 35, No. 10, 2005, pp. 1891-1899. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.007

31. Khelifi, H.; Perrot, A.; Lecompte, T.; Rangeard, D.; and Ausias, G., “Prediction of Extrusion Load and Liquid Phase Filtration during Ram Extrusion of High Solid Volume Fraction Pastes,” Powder Technology, V. 249, Nov. 2013, pp. 258-268. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.08.023

32. Marchment, T., and Sanjayan, J., “Method of Enhancing Interlayer Bond Strength in 3D Concrete Printing,” First RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication - Digital Concrete 2018, RILEM Bookseries, V. 19, T. Wangler and R. Flatt, eds., Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2020, pp. 148-156. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-99519-9

33. Mohan, M. K.; Rahul, A. V.; Van Tittelboom, K.; and De Schutter, G., “Evaluating the Influence of Aggregate Content on Pumpability of 3D Printable Concrete,” Second RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication: Digital Concrete 2020, RILEM Bookseries, V. 28, F. Bos, S. Lucas, R. Wolfs, and T. Salet, eds., Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2020, pp. 333-341. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-49916-7_34

34. Bohuchval, M.; Sonebi, M.; Amziane, S.; and Perrot, A., “Effect of Metakaolin and Natural Fibres on Three-Dimensional Printing Mortar,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Construction Materials, V. 174, No. 3, 2020, pp. 115-128. doi: 10.1680/jcoma.20.00009

35. Rahul, A. V.; Santhanam, M.; Meena, H.; and Ghani, Z., “3D Printable Concrete: Mixture Design and Test Methods,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 97, Mar. 2019, pp. 13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.12.014

36. Rushing, T. S.; Stynoski, P. B.; Barna, L. A.; Al-Chaar, G. K.; Burroughs, J. F.; Shannon, J. D.; Kreiger, M. A.; and Case, M. P., “Investigation of Concrete Mixtures for Additive Construction,” 3D Concrete Printing Technology, J. G. Sanjayan, A. Nazari, and B. Nematollahi, eds., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2019, pp. 137-160. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-815481-6.00007-5

37. Moeini, M. A.; Hosseinpoor, M.; and Yahia, A., “Use of the Chemical and Mineral Admixtures to Tailor the Rheology and the Green Strength of 3D Printing Cementitious Mixtures,” Second RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication: Digital Concrete 2020, RILEM Bookseries, V. 28, F. Bos, S. Lucas, R. Wolfs, and T. Salet, eds., Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2020, pp. 73-82. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-49916-7_8


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Materials Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer