Use of Nanoclays and Methylcellulose to Tailor Rheology for Three-Dimensional Concrete Printing

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Use of Nanoclays and Methylcellulose to Tailor Rheology for Three-Dimensional Concrete Printing

Author(s): AlaEddin Douba and Shiho Kawashima

Publication: Materials Journal

Volume: 118

Issue: 6

Appears on pages(s): 275-289

Keywords: methylcellulose; nanoclays; rheology; three-dimensional (3D) concrete printing

DOI: 10.14359/51733129

Date: 11/1/2021

Abstract:
A concrete system is identified as highly printable if it can offer minimal resistance to handling while sustaining high load resistance and structural stability. One of the major complexities of three-dimensional (3D) concrete printing lies in its sensitivity to materials and equipment that varies the time among layers, hydration time, and shear history. While nanoclays are effective additives for enhancing structural buildup, methylcellulose is introduced as a secondary additive to significantly amplify the nanoclays’ effect on the static yield stress while prolonging the open time between layers and increasing filament cohesiveness. The compatibility of these two systems at different contents is studied by characterizing rheological properties such as static yield stress, steady-state viscosity, and storage modulus, as well as the heat of hydration through isothermal calorimetry. The hybrid system is found to increase the static yield stress by up to 900% compared to the reference paste at only 3.0 wt.% total content by mass.

Related References:

1. Roussel, N., “A Thixotropy Model for Fresh Fluid Concretes: Theory, Validation and Applications,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 36, No. 10, Oct. 2006, pp. 1797-1806.

2. Wangler, T.; Roussel, N.; Bos, F. P.; Salet, T. A. M.; and Flatt, R. J., “Digital Concrete: A Review,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 123, Sept. 2019, p. 105780. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105780

3. Buswell, R. A.; Leal de Silva, W. R.; Jones, S. Z.; and Dirrenberger, J., “3D Printing Using Concrete Extrusion: A Roadmap for Research,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 112, Oct. 2018, pp. 37-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.006.10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.006

4. Le, T. T.; Austin, S. A.; Lim, S.; Buswell, R. A.; Gibb, A. G. F.; and Thorpe, T., “Mix Design and Fresh Properties for High-Performance Printing Concrete,” Materials and Structures, V. 45, No. 8, Aug. 2012, pp. 1221-1232.

5. Rahul, A. V.; Santhanam, M.; Meena, H.; and Ghani, Z., “3D Printable Concrete: Mixture Design and Test Methods,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 97, Mar. 2019, pp. 13-23.

6. Panda, B.; Ruan, S.; Unluer, C.; and Tan, M. J., “Investigation of the Properties of Alkali-Activated Slag Mixes Involving the Use of Nanoclay and Nucleation Seeds for 3D Printing,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 186, Apr. 2020, p. 107826. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107826

7. Mendoza Reales, O. A.; Duda, P.; Silva, E. C. C. M.; Paiva, M. D. M.; and Toledo Filho, R. D., “Nanosilica Particles as Structural Buildup Agents for 3D Printing with Portland Cement Pastes,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 219, Sept. 2019, pp. 91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.174

8. Panda, B.; Unluer, C.; and Tan, M. J., “Extrusion and Rheology Characterization of Geopolymer Nanocomposites Used in 3D Printing,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 176, Nov. 2019, p. 107290. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107290.10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107290

9. Jo, J. H.; Jo, B. W.; Cho, W.; and Kim, J.-H., “Development of a 3D Printer for Concrete Structures: Laboratory Testing of Cementitious Materials,” International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, V. 14, 2020, Article No. 13.

10. Lu, B.; Weng, Y.; Li, M.; Qian, Y.; Leong, K. F.; Tan, M. J.; and Qian, S., “A Systematical Review of 3D Printable Cementitious Materials,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 207, May 2019, pp. 477-490. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.144

11. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, G.; Yang, Y.; Wu, M.; and Pang, B., “Fresh Properties of a Novel 3D Printing Concrete Ink,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 174, June 2018, pp. 263-271.

12. Roussel, N., “Rheological Requirements for Printable Concretes,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 112, Oct. 2018, pp. 76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.005

13. Bos, F.; Wolfs, R.; Ahmed, Z.; and Salet, T., “Additive Manufacturing of Concrete in Construction: Potentials and Challenges of 3D Concrete Printing,” Virtual and Physical Prototyping, V. 11, No. 3, 2016, pp. 209-225. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867

14. Tay, Y. W. D.; Ting, G. H. A.; Qian, Y.; Panda, B.; He, L. W.; and Tan, M. J., “Time Gap Effect on Bond Strength of 3D-Printed Concrete,” Virtual and Physical Prototyping, V. 14, No. 1, 2019, pp. 104-113. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2018.1500420

15. Kazemian, A.; Yuan, X.; Cochran, E.; and Khoshnevis, B., “Cementitious Materials for Construction-Scale 3D Printing: Laboratory Testing of Fresh Printing Mixture,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 145, Aug. 2017, pp. 639-647. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.015

16. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; She, W.; Yang, L.; Liu, G.; and Yang, Y., “Rheological and Harden Properties of the High-Thixotropy 3D Printing Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 201, Mar. 2019, pp. 278-285. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.061

17. Dressler, I.; Freund, N.; and Lowke, D., “The Effect of Accelerator Dosage on Fresh Concrete Properties and on Interlayer Strength in Shotcrete 3D Printing,” Materials, V. 13, No. 2, 2020, p. 374.

18. Nerella, V. N.; Krause, M.; and Mechtcherine, V., “Direct Printing Test for Buildability of 3D-Printable Concrete Considering Economic Viability,” Automation in Construction, V. 109, Jan. 2020, p. 102986. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102986

19. Weng, Y.; Li, M.; Tan, M. J.; and Qian, S., “Design 3D Printing Cementitious Materials via Fuller Thompson Theory and Marson-Percy Model,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 163, Feb. 2018, pp. 600-610. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.112

20. Soltan, D. G., and Li, V. C., “A Self-Reinforced Cementitious Composite for Building-Scale 3D Printing,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 90, July 2018, pp. 1-13.

21. Wangler, T.; Lloret, E.; Reiter, L.; Hack, N.; Gramazio, F.; Kohler, M.; Bernhard, M.; Dillenburger, B.; Buchli, J.; Roussel, N.; and Flatt, R., “Digital Concrete: Opportunities and Challenges,” RILEM Technical Letters, V. 1, 2016, pp. 67-75. doi: 10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.16

22. Bentz, D. P.; Jones, S. Z.; Bentz, I. R.; and Peltz, M. A., “Towards the Formulation of Robust and Sustainable Cementitious Binders for 3-D Additive Construction by Extrusion,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 175, June 2018, pp. 215-224.

23. Chen, M.; Li, L.; Wang, J.; Huang, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhao, P.; Lu, L.; and Cheng, X., “Rheological Parameters and Building Time of 3D Printing Sulphoaluminate Cement Paste Modified by Retarder and Diatomite,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 234, Feb. 2020, p. 117391. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117391

24. Qian, Y., and De Schutter, G., “Enhancing Thixotropy of Fresh Cement Pastes with Nanoclay in Presence of Polycarboxylate Ether Superplasticizer (PCE),” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 111, Sept. 2018, pp. 15-22.

25. Charrier, M., and Ouellet-Plamondon, C., “Testing Procedures on Materials to Formulate the Ink for 3D Printing,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, V. 2674, No. 2, Feb. 2020, pp. 21-32. doi: 10.1177/0361198120907583

26. Sajadi, S. M.; Boul, P. J.; Thaemlitz, C.; Meiyazhagan, A. K.; Puthirath, A. B.; Tiwary, C. S.; Rahman, M. M.; and Ajayan, P. M., “Direct Ink Writing of Cement Structures Modified with Nanoscale Additive,” Advanced Engineering Materials, V. 21, No. 8, Aug. 2019, p. 1801380. doi: 10.1002/adem.201801380

27. Chen, M.; Liu, B.; Li, L.; Cao, L.; Huang, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhao, P.; Lu, L.; and Cheng, X., “Rheological Parameters, Thixotropy and Creep of 3D-Printed Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement Composites Modified by Bentonite,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 186, Apr. 2020, p. 107821. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107821

28. Panda, B.; Lim, J. H.; and Tan, M. J., “Mechanical Properties and Deformation Behaviour of Early Age Concrete in the Context of Digital Construction,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 165, May 2019, pp. 563-571.

29. Panda, B., and Tan, M. J., “Experimental Study on Mix Proportion and Fresh Properties of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer for 3D Concrete Printing,” Ceramics International, V. 44, No. 9, June 2018, pp. 10258-10265.

30. Kawashima, S.; Kim, J. H.; Corr, D. J.; and Shah, S. P., “Study of the Mechanisms Underlying the Fresh-State Response of Cementitious Materials Modified with Nanoclays,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 36, Nov. 2012, pp. 749-757.

31. Paul, S. C.; van Zijl, G. P. A. G.; Tan, M. J.; and Gibson, I., “A Review of 3D Concrete Printing Systems and Materials Properties: Current Status and Future Research Prospects,” Rapid Prototyping Journal, V. 24, No. 4, 2018, pp. 784-798.

32. Nerella, V. N.; Hempel, S.; and Mechtcherine, V., “Effects of Layer-Interface Properties on Mechanical Performance of Concrete Elements Produced by Extrusion-Based 3D-Printing,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 205, Apr. 2019, pp. 586-601. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.235.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.235

33. Liu, Y.; Han, J.; Li, M.; and Yan, P., “Effect of a Nanoscale Viscosity Modifier on Rheological Properties of Cement Pastes and Mechanical Properties of Mortars,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 190, Nov. 2018, pp. 255-264.

34. Kovler, K., and Roussel, N., “Properties of Fresh and Hardened Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 41, No. 7, July 2011, pp. 775-792. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.009

35. Chen, Y.; Figueiredo, S. C.; Li, Z.; Chang, Z.; Jansen, K.; Çopuroğlu, O.; and Schlangen, E., “Improving Printability of Limestone-Calcined Clay-Based Cementitious Materials by Using Viscosity-Modifying Admixture,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 132, June 2020, p. 106040.

36. Grabiec, A. M., “Influence of Viscosity Modifying Agent on Some Rheological Properties, Segregation Resistance and Compressive Strength of Self-Compacting Concrete,” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, V. 19, No. 1, 2013, pp. 1-8.

37. Brumaud, C.; Bessaies-Bey, H.; Mohler, C.; Baumann, R.; Schmitz, M.; Radler, M.; and Roussel, N., “Cellulose Ethers and Water Retention,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 53, Nov. 2013, pp. 176-184.

38. Patural, L.; Porion, P.; Van Damme, H.; Govin, A.; Grosseau, P.; Ruot, B.; and Devès, O., “A Pulsed Field Gradient and NMR Imaging Investigations of the Water Retention Mechanism by Cellulose Ethers in Mortars,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 40, No. 9, Sept. 2010, pp. 1378-1385.

39. Patural, L.; Marchal, P.; Govin, A.; Grosseau, P.; Ruot, B.; and Devès, O., “Cellulose Ethers Influence on Water Retention and Consistency in Cement-Based Mortars,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 41, No. 1, Jan. 2011, pp. 46-55.

40. Benaicha, M.; Roguiez, X.; Jalbaud, O.; Burtschell, Y.; and Alaoui, A. H., “Influence of Silica Fume and Viscosity Modifying Agent on the Mechanical and Rheological Behavior of Self Compacting Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 84, June 2015, pp. 103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.061

41. Brumaud, C.; Baumann, R.; Schmitz, M.; Radler, M.; and Roussel, N., “Cellulose Ethers and Yield Stress of Cement Pastes,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 55, Jan. 2014, pp. 14-21.

42. Khayat, K. H., “Workability, Testing, and Performance of Self-Consolidating Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 96, No. 3, May-June 1999, pp. 346-353.

43. Prakash, J. R., “Universal Dynamics of Dilute and Semidilute Solutions of Flexible Linear Polymers,” Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, V. 43, Oct. 2019, pp. 63-79.

44. Bessaies-Bey, H.; Baumann, R.; Schmitz, M.; Radler, M.; and Roussel, N., “Organic Admixtures and Cement Particles: Competitive Adsorption and Its Macroscopic Rheological Consequences,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 80, Feb. 2016, pp. 1-9.

45. Nasatto, P. L.; Pignon, F.; Silveira, J. L. M.; Duarte, M. E. R.; Noseda, M. D.; and Rinaudo, M., “Methylcellulose, a Cellulose Derivative with Original Physical Properties and Extended Applications,” Polymers, V. 7, No. 5, May 2015, pp. 777-803.

46. Bessaies-Bey, H.; Palacios, M.; Pustovgar, E.; Hanafi, M.; Baumann, R.; Flatt, R. J.; and Roussel, N., “Non-Adsorbing Polymers and Yield Stress of Cement Paste: Effect of Depletion Forces,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 111, Sept. 2018, pp. 209-217.

47. Papanagopoulos, D.; Pierri, E.; and Dondos, A., “Influence of the Shear Rate, of the Molecular Architecture and of the Molecular Mass on the Critical Overlapping Concentration c*,” Polymer, V. 39, No. 11, 1998, pp. 2195-2199.

48. Flatt, R., and Schober, I., “Superplasticizers and the Rheology of Concrete,” Understanding the Rheology of Concrete, N. Roussel, ed., Woodhead Publishing Series in Civil and Structural Engineering, Sawston, UK, 2012, pp. 144-208.

49. Young, J. F., “A Review of the Mechanisms of Set-Retardation in Portland Cement Pastes Containing Organic Admixtures,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 2, No. 4, July 1972, pp. 415-433. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(72)90057-9

50. Baba, T., and Tsujimoto, Y., “Examination of Calcium Silicate Cements with Low-Viscosity Methyl Cellulose or Hydroxypropyl Cellulose Additive,” BioMed Research International, V. 2016, 2016, p. 4583854. doi:10.1155/2016/4583854

51. Pourchez, J.; Grosseau, P.; and Ruot, B., “Changes in C3S Hydration in the Presence of Cellulose Ethers,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 40, No. 2, 2010, pp. 179-188. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.10.008

52. Ou, Z. H.; Ma, B. G.; and Jian, S. W., “Influence of Cellulose Ethers Molecular Parameters on Hydration Kinetics of Portland Cement at Early Ages,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 33, Aug. 2012, pp. 78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.01.007

53. Weyer, H. J.; Müller, I.; Schmitt, B.; Bosbach, D.; and Putnis, A., “Time-Resolved Monitoring of Cement Hydration: Influence of Cellulose Ethers on Hydration Kinetics,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, V. 238, No. 1-4, Aug. 2005, pp. 102-106.

54. Qian, Y.; Lesage, K.; El Cheikh, K.; and De Schutter, G., “Effect of Polycarboxylate Ether Superplasticizer (PCE) on Dynamic Yield Stress, Thixotropy and Flocculation State of Fresh Cement Pastes in Consideration of the Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC),” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 107, May 2018, pp. 75-84.

55. Kawai, T., and Okada, T., “Effect of Superplasticizer and Viscosity-Increasing Admixture on Properties of Lightweight Aggregate Concrete,” Superplasticizers and Other Chemical Admixtures in Concrete, SP-119, V. M. Malhotra, ed., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, Sept. 1989, pp. 583-604

56. Palacios, M., and Flatt, R. J., “Working Mechanism of Viscosity-Modifying Admixtures,” Science and Technology of Concrete Admixtures, P.-C. Aïtcin and R. J. Flatt, eds., Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, UK, 2016, pp. 415-432.

57. Ma, S., and Kawashima, S., “Investigating the Working Mechanisms of Viscosity-Modifying Admixtures through Rheological and Water Transport Properties,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 32, No. 2, Feb. 2020, p. 4019357. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003018

58. Ivanova, I., and Mechtcherine, V., “Effects of Volume Fraction and Surface Area of Aggregates on the Static Yield Stress and Structural Build-Up of Fresh Concrete,” Materials, V. 13, No. 7, Apr. 2020, p. 1551. doi: 10.3390/ma13071551

59. Roussel, N.; Ovarlez, G.; Garrault, S.; and Brumaud, C., “The Origins of Thixotropy of Fresh Cement Pastes,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 42, No. 1, Jan. 2012, pp. 148-157.

60. Coussot, P., “Introduction to the Rheology of Complex Fluids,” Understanding the Rheology of Concrete, N. Roussel, ed., Woodhead Publishing Series in Civil and Structural Engineering, Sawston, UK, 2012, pp. 3-22.

61. Flatt, R. J., “Dispersion Forces in Cement Suspensions,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 34, No. 3, Mar. 2004, pp. 399-408. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.08.019

62. Flatt, R. J., and Bowen, P., “Electrostatic Repulsion between Particles in Cement Suspensions: Domain of Validity of Linearized Poisson–Boltzmann Equation for Nonideal Electrolytes,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 33, No. 6, June 2003, pp. 781-791. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)01059-1

63. Dejaeghere, I.; Sonebi, M.; and De Schutter, G., “Influence of Nano-Clay on Rheology, Fresh Properties, Heat of Hydration and Strength of Cement-Based Mortars,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 222, Oct. 2019, pp. 73-85.

64. Qian, Y., and Kawashima, S., “Use of Creep Recovery Protocol to Measure Static Yield Stress and Structural Rebuilding of Fresh Cement Pastes,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 90, Dec. 2016, pp. 73-79.

65. Ma, S.; Qian, Y.; and Kawashima, S., “Experimental and Modeling Study on the Non-Linear Structural Build-Up of Fresh Cement Pastes Incorporating Viscosity Modifying Admixtures,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 108, June 2018, pp. 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.022.10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.022

66. Bhardwaj, P.; Kamil, M.; and Panda, M., “Surfactant-Polymer Interaction: Effect of Hydroxypropylmethyl Cellulose on the Surface and Solution Properties of Gemini Surfactants,” Colloid and Polymer Science, V. 296, No. 11, Nov. 2018, pp. 1879-1889. doi: 10.1007/s00396-018-4409-5

67. Zhang, J. Y.; Wang, X. P.; Liu, H. Y.; Tang, J. A.; and Jiang, L., “Interfacial Rheology Investigation of Polyacrylamide-Surfactant Interactions,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, V. 132, No. 1, Jan. 1998, pp. 9-16. doi: 10.1016/S0927-7757(97)00151-9

68. Abebe, Y. A., and Lohaus, L., “Rheological Characterization of the Structural Breakdown Process to Analyze the Stability of Flowable Mortars under Vibration,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 131, Jan. 2017, pp. 517-525. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.102

69. Saak, A. W.; Jennings, H. M.; and Shah, S. P., “New Methodology for Designing Self-Compacting Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 98, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2001, pp. 429-439.

70. Assaad, J.; Khayat, K. H.; and Daczko, J., “Evaluation of Static Stability of Self-Consolidating Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 101, No. 3, May-June 2004, pp. 207-215.

71. Makar, J. M., and Chan, G. W., “Growth of Cement Hydration Products on Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, V. 92, No. 6, June 2009, pp. 1303-1310.

72. Makar, J. M., and Chan, G. W., “End of the Induction Period in Ordinary Portland Cement as Examined by High-Resolution Scanning Electron Microscopy,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, V. 91, No. 4, Apr.  2008, pp. 1292-1299. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02304.x

73. Makar, J. M.; Chan, G. W.; and Esseghaier, K. Y., “A Peak in the Hydration Reaction at the End of the Cement Induction Period,” Journal of Materials Science, V. 42, No. 4, Feb. 2007, pp. 1388-1392.

74. Mindess, S.; Young, J. F.; and Darwin, D., Concrete, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003, 671 pp.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Materials Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer