Confinement Effect on Axial Behavior of Lightweight Aggregate Concrete Columns

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Confinement Effect on Axial Behavior of Lightweight Aggregate Concrete Columns

Author(s): Ju-Hyun Mun, Keun-Hyeok Yang, Myoung-Sung Choi, and Chun-Ho Chang

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 118

Issue: 6

Appears on pages(s): 267-277

Keywords: axial ductility; column; confinement; lightweight aggregate concrete; modification factor; stress-strain relationship

DOI: 10.14359/51733080

Date: 11/1/2021

Abstract:
This study aims to examine the axial performance and confinement effect in reinforced concrete columns with different concrete unit weights (ρc). Eleven columns, classified into all-lightweight aggregate concrete (ALWAC), sand-LWAC (SLWAC), and normal-weight concrete (NWC) groups, were tested under concentric axial loads. The existing data compiled from the previous NWC and LWAC column specimens are also used to compare the confinement effect in LWAC columns with those of NWC columns at similar levels of the transverse reinforcement index (ωsh). Test results show that the lateral confining pressure by the transverse reinforcement tends to decrease with the decrease in ρc. Hence, the strength gain factors, strains corresponding to the peak stress of the stress-strain performance, and axial ductility ratio of columns are lower for LWAC columns compared with those for the counterpart NWC columns. The decreasing rates of the axial ductility ratio with the decrease in ρc were more conspicuous in columns with more transverse reinforcement. The increasing rate in the tensile strains of hoops owing to the increase in the applied axial loads is lower for columns with a lower ρc. Hence, modification factors as a function of ρc in the stress-strain model of confined concrete proposed by Razvi and Saatcioglu are introduced herein to account for the reduced confinement effectiveness due to the crack and failure characteristics of LWAC.

Related References:

1. Elwood, K. J.; Maffei, J.; Riederer, K. A.; and Telleen, K., “Improving Column Confinement–Part 1: Assessment of Design Provisions,” Concrete International, V. 31, No. 11, Nov. 2009, pp. 32-39.

2. Sakai, K., and Sheikh, S. A., “What Do We Know about Confinement Reinforced Concrete Columns? (A Critical Review of Previous Work and Code Provisions),” ACI Structural Journal, V. 86, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1989, pp. 192-207.

3. Kent, D. C., and Park, R., “Flexural Members with Confined Concrete,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, V. 97, No. 7, July 1971, pp. 1969-1990. doi: 10.1061/JSDEAG.0002957

4. Razvi, S., and Saatcioglu, M., “Confinement Model for High-Strength Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 125, No. 3, Mar. 1999, pp. 281-289. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:3(281)

5. Hong, K.-N.; Akiyama, M.; Yi, S.-T.; and Suzuki, M., “Stress–Strain Behaviour of High-Strength Concrete Columns Confined by Low-Volumetric Ratio Rectangular Ties,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 58, No. 2, Mar. 2006, pp. 101-115. doi: 10.1680/macr.2006.58.2.101

6. Sakino, K., and Sun, Y., “Stress-Strain Curve of Concrete Confined by Rectilinear Hoop,” Journal of Structure and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), V. 59, No. 461, 1994, pp. 95-104. (in Japanese) doi: 10.3130/aijs.59.95_1

7. Mander, J. B.; Priestley, M. J. N.; and Park, R., “Observed Stress-Strain Behavior of Confined Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 114, No. 8, Sept. 1988, pp. 1827-1849. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1827)

8. Basset, R., and Uzumeri, S. M., “Effect of Confinement on the Behaviour of High-Strength Lightweight Concrete Columns,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, V. 13, No. 6, Dec. 1986, pp. 741-751. doi: 10.1139/l86-109

9. Wu, T.; Wei, H.; Zhang, Y.; and Liu, X., “Axial Compressive Behavior of Lightweight Aggregate Concrete Columns Confined with Transverse Steel Reinforcement,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, V. 10, No. 3, Mar. 2018, pp. 1-14. doi: 10.1177/1687814018766632

10. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 624 pp.

11. Kan, Y. C.; Chen, L. H.; Wu, C. H.; Huang, C. H.; Yen, T.; and Chen, W. C., “Behavior and Size Effect of Lightweight Aggregate Concrete Column under Axial Load,” Materials Science, 2010, pp. 1-4.

12. Mun, J.-H., “Development of Displacement Ductility Ratio-Based Seismic-Design Approach for Lightweight Aggregate Concrete Columns,” National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Technical Report, Kyonggi University, Suwon, South Korea, 2020. (in Korean)

13. Yang, K.-H.; Mun, J.-H.; Cho, M.-S.; and Kang, T. H.-K., “Stress-Strain Model for Various Unconfined Concretes in Compression,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 111, No. 4, July-Aug. 2014, pp. 819-826.

14. Lee, K.-H.; Yang, K.-H.; Mun, J.-H.; and Kwon, S.-J., “Mechanical Properties of Concrete Made from Different Expanded Lightweight Aggregates,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 116, No. 2, Mar. 2019, pp. 9-19. doi: 10.14359/51712265

15. Yang, K.-H., and Kim, W.-W., “Axial Compression Performance of Reinforced Concrete Short Columns with Supplementary V-Shaped Ties,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 113, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2016, pp. 1347-1356. doi: 10.14359/51689159

16. Lee, K.-H.; Yang, K.-H.; and Mun, J.-H., and VanTuan, N., “Effect of Sand Content on the Workability and Mechanical Properties of Concrete Using Bottom Ash and Dredged Soil-Based Artificial Lightweight Aggregates,” International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, V. 13, 2019, pp. 115-127. doi: 10.1186/s40069-018-0306-z

17. ASTM C330/C330M-09, “Standard Specification for Lightweight Aggregates for Structural Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2009, 6 pp.

18. Yang, K.-H.; Kim, G.-H.; and Choi, Y.-H., “An Initial Trial Mixture Proportioning Procedure for Structural Lightweight Aggregate Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 55, Mar. 2014, pp. 431-439. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.108

19. ASTM C150/C150M-12, “Standard Specification for Portland Cement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, 9 pp.

20. ASTM C143/C143M-12, “Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, 4 pp.

21. ASTM C231-04, “Standard Test Method for Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Pressure Method,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004, 9 pp.

22. ASTM A370-12, “Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, 47 pp.

23. Nilsen, A. U.; Monteiro, P. J. M.; and Gjørv, O. E., “Estimation of the Elastic Moduli of Lightweight Aggregate,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 25, No. 2, Feb. 1995, pp. 276-280. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00009-7

24. Sheikh, S. A., and Uzumeri, S. M., “Analytical Model for Concrete Confinement in Tied Columns,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, V. 108, No. 12, Dec. 1982, pp. 2703-2722.

25. Saatcioglu, M., and Razvi, S. R., “Strength and Ductility of Confined Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 118, No. 6, June 1992, pp. 1590-1607. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:6(1590)


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer