Alkali-Activated Cement Subject to Alkali-Aggregate Reaction

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Alkali-Activated Cement Subject to Alkali-Aggregate Reaction

Author(s): M. C. de Moraes, I. S. Buth, C. Angulski da Luz, E. A. Langaro, and M. H. F. Medeiros

Publication: Materials Journal

Volume: 118

Issue: 5

Appears on pages(s): 137-147

Keywords: alkali-activated cement; alkali-aggregate reaction; blast-furnace slag from charcoal

DOI: 10.14359/51732937

Date: 9/1/2021

Abstract:
Recently, alkali-activated cement (AAC) has been studied to partially replace portland cement (PC) to reduce the environmental impact caused by civil construction and the cement industry. However, with regard to durability, few studies have addressed the behavior of AAC. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of AAC made from blast-furnace slag with contents of 4 and 5% sodium hydroxide as an activator (Na2Oeq of 3.72% and 4.42%, respectively) when subjected to alkali-aggregate reaction (AAR). Length variation tests were carried out on mortar bars immersed in NaOH solution (1 N of NaOH, T = 80°C [176°F]) and on concrete bars (T = 60°C [140°F], RH = 95%); compressive strengths tests and scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) analyses were also made. Two types of PC were used as a comparison. The results showed good behavior of the AAC in relation to the AAR, with expansions lower than those established by the norm (34% of the limit) and without the finding of losses of mechanical resistance or structural integrity. The alkaline activator content had a small influence on the behavior of the AACs, in which the lowest amount of NaOH (4%) showed fewer expansions (only 15% of the limit established by the norm). Even for the highest activator content (5%), the results were good and comparable to those of PC with pozzolans, which is recommended for the inhibition of AAR.

Related References:

1. Juenger, M.; Snellings, R.; and Bernal, S., “Supplementary Cementitious Materials: New Sources, Characterization, and Performance Insights,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 122, Aug. 2019, pp. 257-273. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.008

2. Scrivener, K. L.; John, V. M.; and Gartner, E. M., “Eco-Efficient Cements: Potential Economically Viable Solutions for a Low-CO2 Cement-Based Materials Industry,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 114, Dec. 2018, pp. 2-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.015

3. Menchaca-Ballinas, L. E., and Escalante-García, J. I., “Limestone as Aggregate and Precursor in Binders of Waste Glass Activated by CaO and NaOH,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 262, Nov. 2020, p. 120013. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120013

4. Provis, J. L.; Palomo, A.; and Shi, C., “Advances in Understanding Alkali-Activated Materials,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 78, Dec. 2015, pp. 110-125. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.04.013

5. Bilim, C., and Atis, C. D., “Alkali Activation of Mortars Containing Different Replacement Levels of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 28, No. 1, 2012, pp. 708-712. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.018

6. Beltrame, N. A. M.; Angulski Da Luz, C.; Perardt, M.; and Hooton, R. D., “Alkali Activated Cement Made from Blast Furnace Slag Generated by Charcoal: Resistance to Attack by Sodium and Magnesium Sulfates,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 238, Mar. 2020, p. 117710. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117710

7. Ali, S.; Neaz Sheikh, M.; Sargeant, M.; and Hadi, M. N. S.,“Influence of Polypropylene and Glass Fibers on Alkali-Activated Slag/Fly Ash Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 117, No. 4, July 2020, pp. 183-192.

8. Mengasini, L.; Mavroulidou, M.; and Gunn, M. J., “Alkali-Activated Concrete Mixes with Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag and Paper Sludge Ash in Seawater Environments,” Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, V. 20, May 2021, p. 100380. doi: 10.1016/j.scp.2021.100380

9. Wang, W., and Noguchi, T., “Alkali-Silica Reaction (ASR) in the Alkali-Activated Cement (AAC) System: A State-of-the-Art Review,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 252, Aug. 2020, p. 119105. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119105

10. Chen, Y.-Z.; Pu, X.-C.; Yang, C.-H.; and Ding, Q.-J., “Alkali Aggregate Reaction in Alkali Slag Cement Mortars,” Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, Materials Science Edition, V. 17, No. 3, 2002, pp. 60-62. doi: 10.1007/BF02838542

11. Fournier, B., and Bérubé, M. A., “Alkali-Aggregate Reaction in Concrete: A Review of Basic Concepts and Engineering Implications,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, V. 27, No. 2, 2000, pp. 167-191. doi: 10.1139/l99-072

12. Hasparyk, N. P.; Monteiro, P. J. M.; and Carasek, H., “Effect of Silica Fume and Rice Husk Ash on Alkali-Silica Reaction,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 97, No. 4, July-Aug. 2001, pp. 486-492.

13. Ponce, J. M., and Batic, O. R., “Different Manifestations of the Alkali-

Silica Reaction in Concrete According to the Reaction Kinetics of the Reactive Aggregate,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 36, No. 6, 2006, pp. 1148-1156. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.12.022

14. Xue, L.; Zhang, Z.; and Wang, H., “Hydration Mechanisms and Durability of Hybrid Alkaline Cements (HACs): A Review,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 266, Jan. 2021, p. 121039. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121039

15. Bakharev, T.; Sanjayan, J. G.; and Cheng, Y. B., “Resistance of Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete to Alkali-Aggregate Reaction,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 31, No. 2, 2001, pp. 331-334. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00483-X

16. Puertas, F.; Palacios, M.; Gil-Maroto, A.; and Vázques, T., “Alkali-Aggregate Behaviour of Alkali-Activated Slag Mortars: Effect of Aggregate Type,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 31, No. 5, 2009, pp. 277-284. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.02.008

17. ASTM C1260-14, “Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Aggregates (Mortar-Bar Method),” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014.

18. Angulo-Ramirez, D. E.; Gutiérrez, R. M.; and Medeiros, M., “Alkali-Activated Portland Blast Furnace Slag Cement Mortars: Performance to Alkali-Aggregate Reaction,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 179, Aug. 2018, pp. 49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.183

19. Cyr, M., and Pouhet, R., “Resistance to Alkali-Aggregate Reaction (AAR) of Alkali-Activated Cement-Based Binders,” Handbook of Alkali-Activated Cements, Mortars and Concretes, F. Pacheco-Torgal, J. A. Labrincha, C. Leonelli, A. Palomo, and P. Chindaprasirt, eds., Elsevier, Cambridge, MA, 2015, pp. 397-422.

20. He, P.; Zhang, B.; Lu, J.; and Poon, C. S., “A Ternary Optimization of Alkali-Activated Cement Mortars Incorporating Glass Powder, Slag and Calcium Aluminate Cement,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 240, Apr. 2020, p. 117983. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117983

21. Chappex, T., and Scriviner, K., “The Influence of Aluminium on the Dissolution of Amorphous Silica and Its Relation to Alkali Silica Reaction,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 42, No. 12, 2012, pp. 1645-1649. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.09.009

22. Shi, Z., and Hu, X., “A Review on Alkali-Aggregate Reactions in Alkali-Activated Mortars/Concretes Made with Alkali-Reactive Aggregates,” Materials and Structures, V. 48, Jan. 2015, pp. 621-628. doi: 10.1617/s11527-014-0505-2

23. Shi, Z.; Geng, G.; Leemann, A.; and Lothenbach, B., “Synthesis, Characterization, and Water Uptake Property of Alkali-Silica Reaction Products,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 121, July 2019, pp. 58-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.04.009

24. Langaro, E. A.; Costa De Moraes, M.; Buth, I. S.; Angulski Da Luz, C.; Pereira Filho, J. I.; and Matoski, A., “Use of Slag (GBFS) Generated in Charcoal Blast Furnace as Raw Material in Alkali-Activated Cement,” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, V. 142, Apr. 2020, pp. 1223-1231. doi: 10.1007/s10973-020-09632-9

25. United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Syndicate of Iron Industry in the State of Minas Gerais (Annual Report), 2015, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1049659/000129281415001071/sidform20f_2014.htm. (last accessed August 2021)

26. Cadore, D. E.; Angulski Da Luz, C.; and Farias De Medeiros, M. H., “An Investigation of the Carbonation of Alkaline Activated Cement Made from Blast Furnace Slag Generated by Charcoal,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 226, Nov. 2019, pp. 117-125. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.209

27. ABNT NBR 16697, “Cimento Portland—Requisitos,” Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2018.

28. Tiecher, F.; Molin, D. C. C. D.; Gomes, M. E. B.; Hasparyk, N. P.; and Monteiro, P. J. M., “Influence of Mesostasis in Volcanic Rocks on the Alkali-Aggregate Reaction,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 34, No. 10, 2012, pp. 1130-1140. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.07.009

29. ABNT NBR 15577-4, “Agregados—Reatividade álcali-agregado—Parte 4: Determinação da expansão em barras de argamassa pelo método acelerado,” Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2018, 11 pp.

30. ABNT NBR 7214, “Areia Normal para Ensaio de Cimento—Especificação,” Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2012.

31. ABNT NBR 15577-1, “Agregados—Reatividade álcali-agregado—Parte 1: Guia para avaliação da reatividade potencial e medidas preventivas para uso de agregados em concreto,” Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2018, 15 pp.

32. ABNT NBR 15577-7, “Agregados—Reatividade álcali-agregado—Parte 7: Determinação da expansão em prismas de concreto pelo método acelerado,” Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2018, 14 pp.

33. ASTM C1293-18a, “Standard Test Method for Determination of Length Change of Concrete due to Alkali-Silica Reaction,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018.

34. ABNT NBR 7215, “Cimento Portland—Determinaçao da Resistência à Compressão de corpos de prova cilíndricos,” Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1996, 8 pp.

35. ASTM C348-02, “Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2002.

36. Williamson, T., and Juenger, M., “The Role of Activating Solution Concentration on Alkali–Silica Reaction in Alkali-Activated Fly Ash Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 83, May 2016, pp. 124-130. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.02.008

37. Munir, M.; Abbas, S.; Qazi, A.; Nehdi, M.; and Kazmi, S., “Role of Test Method in Detection of Alkali–Silica Reactivity of Concrete Aggregates,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Construction Materials, V. 171, No. 5, 2017, pp. 203-221.

38. Hasparyk, N., “Escola de engenharia—Programa de pós graduação em engenharia civil—Investigação de concretos afetados pela reação álcali-agregado e caracterização avançada do gel exsudado,” Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2005.

39. García-Lodeiro, I.; Palomo, A.; and Fernández-Jiménez, A., “Alkali–Aggregate Reaction in Activated Fly Ash Systems,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 37, No. 2, 2007, pp. 175-183. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.11.002

40. Shi, Z.; Shi, C.; Zhang, J.; Wan, Z.; Zhang, Z.; and Ou, Z., “Alkali-Silica Reaction in Waterglass-Activated Slag Mortars Incorporating Fly Ash and Metakaolin,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 108, June 2018, pp. 10-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.002

41. Fernandes, I., “Composition of Alkali–Silica Reaction Products at Different Locations within Concrete Structures,” Materials Characterization, V. 60, No. 7, 2009, pp. 655-668. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2009.01.011

42. Swamy, R. N., and Al-Asali, M. M., “Expansion of Concrete due to Alkali-Silica Reaction,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 85, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1988, pp. 33-40.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Materials Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer