Assessment of Hardened Concrete Properties of MgO-SIO2 Binder Systems

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Assessment of Hardened Concrete Properties of MgO-SIO2 Binder Systems

Author(s): Vineet Shah and Allan Scott

Publication: Materials Journal

Volume: 118

Issue: 2

Appears on pages(s): 223-232

Keywords: hydrotalcite; magnesium oxide; metakaolin; resistivity; shrinkage

DOI: 10.14359/51730418

Date: 3/1/2021

Abstract:
Magnesium silicate hydrate (M-S-H) formed by the reaction between magnesium oxide and amorphous silica in water imparts strength-binding characteristics similar to that of portland cement (PC). Analysis of both the mechanical and durability parameters of MgO-SiO2 binder is essential for its adoption as an alternative cementitious material. This study investigates the mechanical and transport properties of MgO-SiO2 binder concrete. Silica fume and metakaolin were used as amorphous silica sources in the binder. The implications of the addition of magnesium carbonate in MgO-SiO2 binder concrete was also investigated. Along with the compressive strength, other hardened properties of concrete including elastic modulus, shrinkage, porosity, sorptivity, permeability, and resistivity were measured at 7, 28, and 90 days. The overall performance of the concrete was improved through the use of metakaolin instead of silica fume in terms of compressive strength, elastic modulus, and shrinkage. The transport properties of the magnesium oxide and metakaolin mixture were found to be better or similar compared to PC, which was attributed to the refined pore structure and lower porosity. The addition of magnesium carbonate further helped to improve the overall performance of the concrete through likely the formation of hydrotalcite type phases.

Related References:

1. Tonelli, M.; Martini, F.; Calucci, L.; Fratini, E.; Geppi, M.; Ridi, F.; Borsacchi, S.; and Baglioni, P., “Structural Characterization of Magnesium Silicate Hydrate: Towards the Design of Eco-Sustainable Cements,” Dalton Transactions (Cambridge, England), V. 45, No. 8, 2016, pp. 3294-3304. doi: 10.1039/C5DT03545G

2. Zhang, T.; Vandeperre, L. J.; and Cheeseman, C. R., “Formation of Magnesium Silicate Hydrate (M-S-H) Cement Pastes Using Sodium Hexametaphosphate,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 65, 2014, pp. 8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.07.001

3. Abdel-Gawwad, H. A.; Abd El-Aleem, S.; Amer, A. A.; El-Didamony, H.; and Arif, M. A., “Combined Impact of Silicate-Amorphicity and MgO-Reactivity on the Performance of Mg-Silicate Cement,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 189, 2018, pp. 78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.171

4. Lothenbach, B.; Scrivener, K.; and Hooton, R. D., “Supplementary Cementitious Materials,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 41, No. 12, 2011, pp. 1244-1256. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.001

5. Tran, H. M., and Scott, A., “Strength and Workability of Magnesium Silicate Hydrate Binder Systems,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 131, 2017, pp. 526-535. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.109

6. Sonat, C., and Unluer, C., “Development of Magnesium-Silicate-Hydrate (M-S-H) Cement with Rice Husk Ash,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 211, 2019, pp. 787-803. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.246

7. Walling, S. A., and Provis, J. L., “Magnesia-Based Cements: A Journey of 150 Years, and Cements for the Future?” Chemical Reviews, V. 116, No. 7, 2016, pp. 4170-4204. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00463

8. Dhakal, M.; Scott, A.; Shah, V.; Dhakal, R.; and Clucas D., “Development of MgO-Metakaolin Binder System,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 284, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122736

9. Zhang, T. T.; Du, Y. N.; Sun, Y. J.; He, Z. M.; and Wu, Z. L., “Development of Magnesium-Silicate-Hydrate Cement by Pulverized Fuel Ash,” Key Engineering Materials, V. 709, 2016, pp. 61-65. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.709.61

10. Li, Z.; Xu, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhang, J.; Wei, J.; and Yu, Q., “Effect of the MgO/Silica Fume Ratio on the Reaction Process of the MgO-SiO2-H2O System,” Materials (Basel), V. 12, No. 1, 2018, pp. 1-12. doi: 10.3390/ma12010080

11. Tran, H.; Scott, A.; and Dhakal, R., “Mechanical and Durability Properties of Concrete with Magnesium Silicate Hydrate Binder Systems,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 72, No. 13, July 2020, pp. 1-31.

12. Zhang, T.; He, Z.; Wu, Z.; and Han, J., “Chloride Ion Penetration Resistance and Pore Structure of Magnesium Silicate Hydrate (M-S-H) Mortars,” Proceedings of the 4th Annual International Conference on Material Engineering and Application (ICMEA 2017), pp. 158-161.

13. Sonat, C.; Teo, W. W.; and Unluer, C., “Performance and Microstructure of MgO-SiO2 Concrete under Different Environments,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 184, 2018, pp. 549-564. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.032

14. Scrivener, K.; Martirena, F.; and Bishnoi, S., “Calcined Clay Limestone Cements (LC3),” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 114, 2018, pp. 49-56.

15. Shah, V., and Scott, A., “Use of Kaolin Clay as a Source of Silica in MgO-SiO2 Binder,” Third International Conference on Calcined Clays for Sustainable Concrete, New Delhi, India, 2019.

16. Shah, V., and Scott, A., “ Use of Kaolinite Clays in Development of a Low Carbon MgO-Clay Binder System,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 144, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106422

17. NZS 3122 : 2009, “Specification for Portland and Blended Cements,” Standards New Zealand, Wellilngton, NZ, 2009.

18. Shah, V., and Scott, A., “Hydration Study of Ternary Magnesium-Silicate-Carbonate System,” Concrete Institute of Australia’s Biennial National Conference. Sydney, Australia, 2019, pp. 3-9.

19. Mehta, P. K., and Monteiro, P. J. M., Concrete Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, McGraw-Hill Education, 2006.

20. ASTM C469, “Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014, pp. 1-5.

21. ASTM C157, “Standard Test Method for Length Change of Hardened Hydraulic-Cement Mortar and Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010, pp. 1-7.

22. Mishra, R. K.; Tripathi, R. K.; and Dubey, V., “Early Age Shrinkage Pattern of Concrete on Replacement of Fine Aggregate with Industrial By-Product,” Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, V. 9, No. 4, 2016, pp. 386-391. doi: 10.1016/j.jrras.2016.05.003

23. Alexander, M. G.; Mackechnie, J. R.; and Ballim, Y., “Durability Index Testing Procedure Manual,” 2009.

24. Weiss, J.; Snyder, K.; Bullard, J.; and Bentz, D., “Using a Saturation Function to Interpret the Electrical Properties of Partially Saturated Concrete,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 25, No. 8, 2013, pp. 1097-1106. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000549

25. McPolin, D. O.; Basheer, P. A. M.; Long, A. E.; Grattan, K. T.; and Sun, T., “New Test Method to Obtain pH Profiles Due to Carbonation of Concretes Containing Supplementary Cementitious Materials,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 19, No. 11, 2007, pp. 936-946. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:11(936)

26. Shah, V., and Bishnoi, S. “Carbonation Resistance of Cements Containing Supplementary Cementitious Materials and Its Relation to Various Parameters of Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 178, 2018.

27. Machner, A.; Zajac, M.; and Ben Haha, M., “Chloride-Binding Capacity of Hydrotalcite in Cement Pastes Containing Dolomite and Metakaolin,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 107, 2018, pp. 163-181.

28. Hibino, T., and Tsunashima, A., “Formation of Spinel from a Hydrotalcite-Like Compound at Low Temperature: Reaction between Edges of Crystallites,” Clays and Clay Minerals, V. 45, No. 6, 1997, pp. 842-853. doi: 10.1346/CCMN.1997.0450608

29. Bernard, E.; Lothenbach, B.; and Winnefeld, F., “Magnesium (Alumino) Silicate Hydrate Formation in Low-pH Cement Paste,” 15th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, Prague, Czech Republic, 2019.

30. Hay, R.; Li, J.; and Celik, K., “Influencing Factors on Micromechanical Properties of Calcium (Alumino) Silicate Hydrate C-(A-)S-H Under Nanoindentation Experiment,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 134, May 2020, p. 106088. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106088

31. Kuenzel, C.; Zhang, F.; Ferrándiz-Mas, V.; Cheeseman, C. R.; and Gartner, E. M., “The Mechanism of Hydration of MgO-Hydromagnesite Blends,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 103, 2018, pp. 123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.10.003

32. Bullerjahn, F., and Zajac, M., “Patents Magnesia Based Binder Composition WO2012136324A1,” 2012.

33. Tran, H., “Development of Magneisum Silicate Hydrate Binder Systems,” University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2019.

34. Soroka, I., Concrete in Hot Environments, first edition, CRC Press, London, UK, 1993, pp. 169-180.

35. Pacheco-Torgal, F.; Shi, C.; and Sanchez, A. P., Carbon Dioxide Sequestration in Cementitious Construction Material, Woodhead, 2018.

36. Jin, F., and Al-Tabbaa, A., “Strength and Drying Shrinkage of Slag Paste Activated by Sodium Carbonate and Reactive MgO,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 81, 2015, pp. 58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.082

37. Haha, M., and Ben, “Influence of Slag Chemistry on the Hydration of Alkali-Activated Blast-Furnace Slag - Part II: Effect of Al2O3,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 42, No. 1, 2012, pp. 74-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.08.005

38. Piasta, W., and Zarzycki, B., “The Effect of Cement Paste Volume and W/C Ratio on Shrinkage Strain, Water Absorption and Compressive Strength of High Performance Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 140, 2017, pp. 395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.033

39. Yang, J.; Wang, Q.; and Zhou, Y., “Influence of Curing Time on the Drying Shrinkage of Concretes with Different Binders and Water-to-Binder Ratios,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2017.

40. Neville, A. M., Properties of Concrete, fifth edition, Prentice Hall, Malaysia, 2011.

41. Chatelet, L.; Bottero, J. Y.; Yvon, J.; and Bouchelaghem, A., “Competition between Monovalent and Divalent Anions for Calcined and Uncalcined Hydrotalcite: Anion Exchange and Adsorption Sites,” Colloids and Surfaces. A, Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, V. 111, No. 3, 1996, pp. 167-175. doi: 10.1016/0927-7757(96)03542-X

42. Kurda, R.; de Brito, J.; and Silvestre, J. D., “Water Absorption and Electrical Resistivity of Concrete with Recycled Concrete Aggregates and Fly Ash,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 95, 2019, pp. 169-182.

43. Alexander, M. J., “Durability Indexes and Their Use in Concrete Engineering,” International RILEM Symposium on Concrete Science and Engineering: A Tribute to Arnon Bentur, Evanston, IL, 2005, pp. 9-22.

44. Dias, W. P. S., “Reduction of Concrete Sorptivity with Age through Carbonation,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 30, No. 8, 2000, pp. 1255-1261. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00311-2

45. Wu, Z.; Wong, H. S.; and Buenfeld, N. R., “Influence of Drying-Induced Microcracking and Related Size Effects on Mass Transport Properties of Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 68, 2015, pp. 35-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.10.018

46. Aligizaki, K. K., Pore Structure of Cement Based Materials Testing, Interpretation and Requirements, first edition, CRC Press, London, UK, 2006, pp. 60-107.

47. Aldred, J. M.; Swaddiwudhipong, S.; and Lee, S. L., “Effect of Moisture Content on Water Transport in Silica Fume Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 97, No. 4, July-Aug. 2000, pp. 126-139.

48. Dhandapani, Y.; Sakthivel, T.; and Santhanam, M., “Mechanical Properties and Durability Performance of Concretes with Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3),” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 107, 2018, pp. 136-151.

49. FM5-578, “Florida Method of Test for Concrete Resistivity as an Electrical Indicator of Its Permeability,” Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL, 2004, pp. 4-7.

50. Scott, A., and Alexander, M. G., “Effect of Supplementary Cementitious Materials (Binder Type) on the Pore Solution Chemistry and the Corrosion of Steel in Alkaline Environments,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 89, 2016, pp. 45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.08.007

51. Dhandapani, Y., and Santhanam, M., “Assessment of Pore Structure Evolution in the Limestone Calcined Clay Cementitious System and Its Implications for Performance,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 84, 2017, pp. 36-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.08.012

52. Wang, H., and Li, Q., “Prediction of Elastic Modulus and Poisson’s Ratio for Unsaturated Concrete,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, V. 44, No. 5, 2007, pp. 1370-1379. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.06.028

53. Morales, M.; Formosa, J.; Xuriguera, E.; Niubó, M.; Segarra, M.; and Chimenos, J. M., “Elastic Modulus of a Chemically Bonded Phosphate Ceramic Formulated with Low-Grade Magnesium Oxide Determined by Nanoindentation,” Ceramics International, V. 41, No. 9, 2015, pp. 12137-12146. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.06.031

54. Ashraf, W., and Olek, J., “Carbonation Activated Binders from Pure Calcium Silicates: Reaction Kinetics and Performance Controlling Factors,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 93, July 2018, pp. 85-98. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.07.004


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Materials Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer