Acoustic Emission Analysis of Self-Consolidating Rubberized Concrete Beam-Column Connections under Cyclic Loading

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Acoustic Emission Analysis of Self-Consolidating Rubberized Concrete Beam-Column Connections under Cyclic Loading

Author(s): Ahmed A. Abouhussien, Assem A. A. Hassan, and Basem H. AbdelAleem

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 116

Issue: 6

Appears on pages(s): 41-51

Keywords: acoustic emission monitoring; beam-column connections; crack detection; intensity analysis; reversed cyclic loading; self-consolidating rubberized concrete

DOI: 10.14359/51716771

Date: 11/1/2019

Abstract:
An experimental investigation has been conducted to monitor the cracking process in self-consolidating rubberized concrete (SCRC) beam-column connections with the aid of acoustic emission (AE). Reinforced concrete beam-column connections were cast using various SCRC mixtures containing six different crumb rubber (CR) percentages (0 to 25%) as a replacement of fine aggregates. The investigated connections were tested under reversed cyclic loading conditions and simultaneously monitored via three attached AE sensors per specimen. The AE data from each loading test were analyzed to detect the crack initiation and quantify the crack propagation in all specimens throughout the tests. This analysis involved studying the variations in the signal amplitudes, number of hits, and cumulative signal strength. In addition, b-value and intensity analyses on the signals’ amplitude and strength were completed to generate three additional AE parameters: b-value, historic index (H(t)), and severity (Sr). The influences of both CR content and sensor location on these AE parameters were highlighted. The results of the AE analysis performed herein allowed an early detection of the first cracks before they could be visually observed, regardless of CR percentage. The development of additional cracks due to further loading cycles was found to be associated with an overall increase in AE activities until failure of all tested specimens. Meanwhile, the increase in the CR content resulted in a noticeable reduction in the AE signal amplitudes. Finally, the results of intensity analysis parameters (H(t) and Sr) were used to develop a damage classification chart. This chart can successfully be used to identify the stages of first crack initiation and ultimate load in the SCRC beam-column connections.

Related References:

1. Thomas, B. S.; Gupta, R. C.; Kalla, P.; and Cseteneyi, L., “Strength, Abrasion and Permeation Characteristics of Cement Concrete Containing Discarded Rubber Fine Aggregates,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 59, May 2014, pp. 204-212. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.074

2. Sadek, D. M., and El-Attar, M. M., “Structural Behavior of Rubberized Masonry Walls,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 89, Feb. 2015, pp. 174-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.098

3. Su, H.; Yang, J.; Ling, T.; Ghataora, G. S.; and Dirar, S., “Properties of Concrete Prepared with Waste Tyre Rubber Particles of Uniform and Varying Sizes,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 91, Mar. 2015, pp. 288-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.022

4. Ismail, M. K., and Hassan, A. A. A., “Impact Resistance and Acoustic Absorption Capacity of Self-Consolidating Rubberized Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 113, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2016, pp. 725-736. doi: 10.14359/51689359

5. AbdelAleem, B. H., and Hassan, A. A. A., “Influence of Rubber Content on Enhancing the Structural Behaviour of Beam-Column Joints,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 70, No. 19, Oct. 2018, pp. 1-13.

6. Zheng, L.; Huo, X.; and Yuan, Y., “Strength, Modulus of Elasticity, and Brittleness Index of Rubberized Concrete,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 20, No. 11, 2008, pp. 692-699. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:11(692)

7. Hall, M., and Najim, K., “Structural Behaviour and Durability of Steel-Reinforced Structural Plain/Self-Compacting Rubberised Concrete (PRC/SCRC),” Construction and Building Materials, V. 73, Dec. 2014, pp. 490-497. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.063

8. Ganesan, N.; Raj, B.; and Shashikala, A. P., “Behavior of Self-Consolidating Rubberized Concrete Beam-Column Joints,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 110, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2013, pp. 697-704.

9. Ziehl, P. H.; Galati, N.; Nanni, A.; and Tumialan, J. G., “In-Situ Evaluation of Two Concrete Slab Systems. II: Evaluation Criteria and Outcomes,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, V. 22, No. 4, 2008, pp. 217-227. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:4(217)

10. Nair, A., and Cai, C. S., “Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Bridges: Review and Case Studies,” Engineering Structures, V. 32, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1704-1714. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.02.020

11. Mpalaskas, A. C.; Vasilakos, I.; Matikas, T. E.; Chai, H. K.; and Aggelis, D. G., “Monitoring of the Fracture Mechanisms Induced by Pull-Out and Compression in Concrete,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, V. 128, Sept. 2014, pp. 219-230. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.07.020

12. Chen, B., and Liu, J., “Experimental Study on AE Characteristics of Three-Point-Bending Concrete Beams,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 34, No. 3, 2004, pp. 391-397. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.08.021

13. Aggelis, D. G.; Soulioti, D. V.; Barkoula, N. M.; Paipetis, A. S.; and Matikas, T. E., “Influence of Fiber Chemical Coating on the Acoustic Emission Behavior of Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 34, No. 1, 2012, pp. 62-67. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.07.003

14. Shahidan, S.; Pulin, R.; Bunnori, N. M.; and Holford, K. M., “Damage Classification in Reinforced Concrete Beam by Acoustic Emission Signal Analysis,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 45, Aug. 2013, pp. 78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.095

15. Alam, S. Y.; Loukili, A.; Grondin, F.; and Rozière, E., “Use of the Digital Image Correlation and Acoustic Emission Technique to Study the Effect of Structural Size on Cracking of Reinforced Concrete,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, V. 143, July 2015, pp. 17-31. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.06.038

16. Farhidzadeh, A.; Salamone, S.; Luna, B.; and Whittaker, A., “Acoustic Emission Monitoring of a Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall by B-Value-Based Outlier Analysis,” Structural Health Monitoring, V. 12, No. 1, 2013, pp. 3-13. doi: 10.1177/1475921712461162

17. Vidya Sagar, R., and Rao, M. V. M. S., “Acoustic Emission during Flexural Deformation of Reinforced Concrete under Incremental Cyclic Loading,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, V. 44, No. 6, 2016, pp. 2182-2198. doi: 10.1520/JTE20140507

18. Li, D.; Du, F.; and Ou, J., “Damage Evaluation of Fiber Reinforced Plastic-Confined Circular Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Columns under Cyclic Loading Using the Acoustic Emission Technique,” Smart Materials and Structures, V. 26, No. 035014, Feb. 2017, pp. 1-13.

19. Ma, G., and Li, H., “Acoustic Emission Monitoring and Damage Assessment of FRP-Strengthened Reinforced Concrete Columns under Cyclic Loading,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 144, July 2017, pp. 86-98. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.169

20. Behnia, A.; Ranjbar, N.; Chai, H. K.; Abdulla, A. I.; and Masaeli, M., “Fracture Characterization of Multi-Layer Wire Mesh Rubberized Ferrocement Composite Slabs by Means of Acoustic Emission,” Journal of Cleaner Production, V. 157, July 2017, pp. 134-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.192

21. Xu, J.; Fu, Z.; Han, Q.; Lacidogna, G.; and Carpinteri, A., “Micro-Cracking Monitoring and Fracture Evaluation for Crumb Rubber Concrete Based on Acoustic Emission Techniques,” Structural Health Monitoring, Sept. 2017, pp. 1-13.

22. Wang, C.; Zhang, Y.; and Ma, A., “Investigation into the Fatigue Damage Process of Rubberized Concrete and Plain Concrete by AE Analysis,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 23, No. 7, 2011, pp. 953-960. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000257

23. ASTM C150/C150M, “Standard Specification for Portland Cement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, 9 pp.

24. ASTM C1611/C1611M, “Standard Test Method for Slump Flow of Self-Consolidating Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014, 6 pp.

25. ASTM C494/C494M, “Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, 10 pp.

26. CSA A23.3-04, “Design of Concrete Structures,” CSA Group, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2004, 258 pp.

27. ACI Committee 374, “Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames Based on Structural Testing and Commentary (ACI 374.1-05),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2005, 9 pp.

28. ASTM C39/C39M, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011, 7 pp.

29. ASTM C496/C496M, “Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, 5 pp.

30. Physical Acoustics Corp, “R6I-AST Sensor,” MISTRAS Group Inc., Princeton Junction, NJ, 2008, 1 p.

31. Physical Acoustics Corp, “PCI-2 Based AE System User’s Manual,” MISTRAS Group Inc., Princeton Junction, NJ, 2009. 4 pp.

32. ASTM E1316, “Standard Terminology for Nondestructive Examinations,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014, 38 pp.

33. Fowler, T.; Blessing, J.; and Conlisk, P., “New Directions in Testing,” Proceedings, Int. Conf. of Acoustic Emission from Composite Materials, K. Ono, ed., Acoustic Emission Working Group, Memphis, TN, 1989, pp. 16-27.

34. Abdelrahman, M.; ElBatanouny, M. K.; and Ziehl, P. H., “Acoustic Emission Based Damage Assessment Method for Prestressed Concrete Structures: Modified Index of Damage,” Engineering Structures, V. 60, Feb. 2014, pp. 258-264. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.12.037

35. Abdelrahman, M.; ElBatanouny, M. K.; Ziehl, P.; Fasl, J.; Larosche, C. J.; and Fraczek, J., “Classification of Alkali–Silica Reaction Damage Using Acoustic Emission: A Proof-of-Concept Study,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 95, Oct. 2015, pp. 406-413. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.093

36. ElBatanouny, M. K.; Mangual, J.; Ziehl, P. H.; and Matta, F., “Early Corrosion Detection in Prestressed Concrete Girders Using Acoustic Emission,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 26, No. 3, 2014, pp. 504-511. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000845

37. Vélez, W.; Matta, F.; and Ziehl, P., “Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Early Corrosion in Prestressed Concrete Piles,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, V. 22, No. 5, 2015, pp. 873-887. doi: 10.1002/stc.1723

38. Abouhussien, A. A., and Hassan, A. A. A., “Evaluation of Damage Progression in Concrete Structures Due to Reinforcing Steel Corrosion Using Acoustic Emission Monitoring,” Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, V. 5, No. 5, 2015, pp. 751-765. doi: 10.1007/s13349-015-0144-5

39. Abouhussien, A. A., and Hassan, A. A. A., “Detection of Bond Failure in the Anchorage Zone of Reinforced Concrete Beams via Acoustic Emission Monitoring,” Smart Materials and Structures, V. 25, No. 7, 2016, p. 075034. doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/25/7/075034

40. Abouhussien, A. A., and Hassan, A. A. A., “Acoustic Emission Monitoring for Bond Integrity Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete under Pull-Out Tests,” Advances in Structural Engineering, V. 20, No. 9, 2017, pp. 1390-1405. doi: 10.1177/1369433216678864

41. Colombo, I. S.; Main, I. G.; and Forde, M. C., “Assessing Damage of Reinforced Concrete Beam Using “b-Value” Analysis of Acoustic Emission Signals,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 15, No. 3, 2003, pp. 280-286. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:3(280)

42. Ohtsu, M., and Tomoda, Y., “Phenomenological Model of Corrosion Process in Reinforced Concrete Identified by Acoustic Emission,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 105, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2008, pp. 194-199.

43. Sagar, R. V.; Prasad, B. K. R.; and Kumar, S. S., “An Experimental Study on Cracking Evolution in Concrete and Cement Mortar by the b-Value Analysis of Acoustic Emission Technique,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 42, No. 8, 2012, pp. 1094-1104. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.05.003

44. Li, D.; Chen, Z.; Feng, Q.; and Wang, Y., “Damage Analysis of CFRP-Confined Circular Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Columns by Acoustic Emission Techniques,” Smart Materials and Structures, V. 24, No. 085017, July 2015, pp. 1-11.

45. Ridgley, K. E.; Abouhussien, A. A.; Hassan, A. A. A.; and Colbourne, B., “Characterization of Damage Due to Abrasion in SCC by Acoustic Emission Analysis,” Magazine of Concrete Research, Jan. 2018, pp. 1-31.

46. Schumacher, T.; Higgins, C.; and Lovejoy, S. C., “Estimating Operating Load Conditions on Reinforced Concrete Highway Bridges with b-Value Analysis from Acoustic Emission Monitoring,” Structural Health Monitoring, V. 10, No. 1, 2011, pp. 17-32. doi: 10.1177/1475921710365424

47. Ervin, B. L., “Monitoring Corrosion of Rebar Embedded in Mortar Using Guided Ultrasonic Waves,” PhD dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 2007.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer