Age and Cure Dependence of Concrete Cone Capacity in Tension

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Age and Cure Dependence of Concrete Cone Capacity in Tension

Author(s): Krešimir Nincevic, Lisa-Marie Czernuschka, Marco Marcon, and Roman Wan-Wendner

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 116

Issue: 4

Appears on pages(s): 91-100

Keywords: concrete aging; concrete cone capacity; mechanical anchors; photogrammetry

DOI: 10.14359/51715575

Date: 7/1/2019

Abstract:
A large experimental campaign was completed with the objective to determine how concrete composition and age affect the tensile load capacity of mechanical anchors with concrete cone breakout, tested in three different normal-strength concretes. Structural tests for cast-in headed stud anchors were performed at 28 and 70 days and compared to results obtained on post-installed undercut anchors. The concretes were fully characterized in terms of Young’s modulus, compressive and tensile strength, and fracture energy. The evolution of the concrete compressive strength is consistent with the aging function proposed in codes. Because the history of environmental conditions influences the development of material properties with age, three different curing conditions are considered for the material characterization, including indoor moist-curing and outdoor storage with the slabs. The structural data clearly show a pronounced aging effect, even after normalization by compressive strength, regardless of the curing protocol considered.

Related References:

1. TR 048, “Details of Tests for Post-Installed Fasteners in Concrete,” European Organisation for Technical Assessments, Brussels, Belgium, 2016, www.eota.eu.

2. European Assessment Document – EAD 330232-00-0601, “Mechanical Fasteners for Use in Concrete,” 2016. www.eota.eu.

3. ICC-ES AC308, “Acceptance Criteria for Post-installed Adhesive Anchors in Concrete Elements,” International Code Council, Brea, CA, 2016.

4. Wendner, R.; Nincˇevic´, K.; Boumakis, I.; and Wan, L., “Age-Dependent Lattice Discrete Particle Model for Quasi-Static Simulations,” Key Engineering Materials, V. 711, 2016, pp. 1090-1097. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.711.1090

5. Wan, L.; Wendner, R.; Liang, B.; and Cusatis, G., “Analysis of the Behavior of Ultrahigh Performance Concrete at Early Age,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 74, 2016, pp. 120-135. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.08.005

6. Wan-Wendner, L.; Wan-Wendner, R.; and Cusatis, G., “Age-Dependent Size Effect and Fracture Characteristics of Ultra-High Performance Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 85, 2018, pp. 67-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.09.010

7. Czernuschka, L. M.; Boumakis, I.; Nincˇevic´, K.; and Wan-Wendner, R., “Determination of Material properties for Structural Applications,” Sharma, A., and Hofmann, J., eds., Book of Abstracts, 3rd International Symposium on Connections between Steel and Concrete, Stuttgart, Germany, Sept. 27-29, 2017.

8. Nincˇevic´, K.; Czernuschka, L. M.; Marcon, M.; Boumakis, I.; and Wan-Wendner, R., “Aggregate Effect in Fastening Applications,” Engineering the Future, Report, IABSE c/o ETH Hönggerber, Zürich, Switzerland, IABSE Symposium, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2017.

9. Marcon, M.; Nincˇevic´, K.; Boumakis, I.; Czernuschka, L.-M.; and Wan-Wendner, R., “Aggregate Effect on the Concrete Cone Capacity of an Undercut Anchor under Quasi-Static Tensile Load,” Materials (Basel), V. 11, No. 5, 2018, p. 711 doi: 10.3390/ma11050711

10. Eligehausen, R., and Sawade, G., “A Fracture Mechanics Based Description of the Pullout Behavior of Headed Studs Embedded in Concrete,” Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures, Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 1989. doi:10.18419/opus-7930

11. Eligehausen, R.; Mallée, R.; and Silva, J., Anchorage in Concrete Construction, Ernst & Sohn, Berlin, Germany, 2006.

12. Ottosen, N. S., “Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Pull-Out Test,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, V. 107, No. 4, 1981, pp. 591-603.

13. Stone, W. C., and Carino, N. J., “Deformation and Failure in Large-scale Pullout Tests,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 80, No. 6, Nov.-Dec., 1983, pp. 501-513.

14. Krenchel, H., and Shah, S. P., “Fracture Analysis of the Pullout Test,” Materials and Structures, V. 18, No. 6, 1985, pp. 439-446. doi: 10.1007/BF02498746

15. Ballarini, R.; Shah, S. P.; and Keer, L. M., “Failure Characteristics of Short Anchor Bolts Embedded in a Brittle Material,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 1986, pp. 35-54.

16. Eligehausen, R., and Sawade, G., “Verhalten von Beton auf Zug (Behavior of Concrete in Tension),” Betonwerk und Fertigteil-Technik 5 und 6, V. 51, No. 5, 1985, pp. 315-322 (in German and English)

17. Ozbolt, J., and Eligehausen, R., “Numerical Analysis of Headed Studs Embedded in Large Plain Concrete Blocks,” Bicanic, N., and Mang, H., eds., Computer Aided Analysis and Design of Concrete Structures, Pinerdige Press, London, UK, 1990.

18. Lee, N., “H.; Kim, K. S.; Bang, C. J.; and Park, K. R., “Tensile-Headed Anchors with Large Diameter and Deep Embedment in Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 104, No. 4, July-Aug. 2007, pp. 479-486.

19. Baran, E.; Schultz, A. E.; and French, C. E., “Tension Tests on Cast-in-Place Inserts: The Influence of Reinforcement and Prestress,” PCI Journal, V. 51, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2006, pp. 88-108.

20. Piccinin, R.; Ballarini, R.; and Cattaneo, S., “Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics Pullout Analyses of Headed Anchors in Stressed Concrete,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, V. 136, No. 6, 2010, pp. 761-768. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000120

21. ACI Committee 349, “Code Requirements for Nuclear Safety Related Concrete Structures (ACI 349-85) (Reapproved 1990),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1985, 129 pp.

22. Bažant, Z. P., “Size Effect in Blunt Fracture: Concrete, Rock, Metal,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, V. 110, No. 4, 1984, pp. 518-535. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:4(518)

23. Bažant, Z. P., and Planas, J., Fracture and Size Effect in Concrete and Other Quasibrittle Materials, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1998.

24. Fuchs, W.; Eligehausen, R.; and Breen, J. E., “Concrete Capacity Design (CCD) Approach for Fastening to Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 92, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1995, pp. 73-94.

25. Cattaneo, S. “Wedge-Type Expansion Anchors in High-Performance Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 104, No. 2, Mar-.Apr. 2007, pp. 191-198.

26. Di Luzio, G., and Cusatis, G., “Solidification-Microprestress-Microplane (SMM) Theory for Concrete at Early Age: Theory, Validation and Application,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, V. 50, No. 6, 2013, pp. 957-975. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.11.022

27. Eligehausen, R.; Bouška, P.; Červenka, V.; and Pukl, R., “Size Effect of the Concrete Cone Failure Load of Anchor Bolts,” 1st International Conference of Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures (FRAMCOS 1), Z. P. Bažant, ed., Taylor & Francis, London, UK, 1992, pp. 517-525.

28. Zhao, G., “Tragverhalten von randfernen Kopfbolzenverankerungen bei Betonbruch,” PhD dissertation, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, 1993, 204 pp.

29. Nilforoush, R.; Nilsson, M.; and Elfgren, L., “Experimental Evaluation of Influence of Member Thickness, Anchor-Head Size, and Orthogonal Surface Reinforcement on the Tensile Capacity of Headed Anchors in Uncracked Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 144, No. 4, 2018, p. 04018012. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001976

30. Nilforoush, R.; Nilsson, M.; Elfgren, L.; Ozbolt, J.; Hofmann, J.; and Eligehausen, R., “Tensile Capacity of Anchor Bolts in Uncracked Concrete: Influence of Member Thickness and Anchor’s Head Size,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 114, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2017, pp. 1519-1530.

31. DIN EN 12390-2, “Pruefung von Festbeton – Teil 2: Herstellung und Lagerung von Probekoerpern fuer Festigkeitspruefungen,” Beuth Verlag, 2012.

32. BS-EN-1992-1-1:2009, “Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures – Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2009.

33. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 519 pp.

34. CEB-FIP, “Model Code for Concrete Structures,” Ernst & Sohn, Berlin, Germany, 2010.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer