Conventional and High-Strength Headed Bars—Part 2: Data Analysis

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Conventional and High-Strength Headed Bars—Part 2: Data Analysis

Author(s): Krishna P. Ghimire, Yun Shao, David Darwin, and Matthew O’Reilly

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 116

Issue: 3

Appears on pages(s): 265-272

Keywords: anchorage; beam-column joints; bond and development; headed bars; high-strength concrete, high-strength steel; reinforcement

DOI: 10.14359/51714480

Date: 5/1/2019

Abstract:
Equations to characterize the anchorage strength of headed bars were developed, incorporating key factors affecting anchorage strength: concrete compressive strength; embedment length; bar diameter; spacing between the bars; and confining reinforcement parallel to the headed bars. Results from tests of 138 exterior beam-column joints, 64 without and 74 with confining reinforcement within the joint region, were used to develop the equations. Concrete compressive strengths ranged from 4050 to 16,030 psi (27.9 to 110.6 MPa) and bar stresses at failure ranged from 33,100 to 153,160 psi (228 to 1056 MPa). The bearing area of the headed bars ranged from 3.8 to 9.5 times the area of the bar. Some headed bars contained obstructions adjacent to the head that exceeded the dimensions permitted for HA heads in ACI 318-14 and ASTM A970-13a but are now permitted by ASTM A970-18. The test results show that headed bar anchorage strength is proportional to the concrete compressive strength raised to the power 0.24. The contribution of confining reinforcement is proportional to the area of confining reinforcement parallel to the headed bar within eight to 10 bar diameters of the headed bar. Headed bars with obstructions larger than those permitted in ACI 318-14 that meet the provisions in ASTM A970-18 exhibit anchorage strengths that are similar to those that meet the provisions in ACI 318-14.

Related References:

ACI Committee 318, 2008, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-08) and Commentary (ACI 318R-08),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 465 pp.

ACI Committee 318, 2014, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 520 pp.

Ajaam, A.; Darwin, D.; and O’Reilly, M. O., 2017, “Anchorage Strength Reinforcing Bars with Standard Hooks,” SM Report No. 125, University of Kansas Center for Research, Lawrence, Kansas, Apr., 346 pp.

Ajaam, A.; Yasso, S.; Darwin, D.; O’Reilly, M.; and Sperry, J., 2018, “Anchorage Strength of Closely Spaced Hooked Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 115, No. 4, July, pp. 1143-1152.

ASTM A970/A970M-13a, 2013, “Standard Specification for Headed Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 9 pp.

ASTM A970/A970M-18, 2018, “Standard Specification for Headed Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 10 pp.

Darwin, D., 2005, “Tension Development Length and Lap Splice Design for Reinforced Concrete Members,” Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, V. 7, No. 4, Oct.-Dec., pp. 210-225. doi: 10.1002/pse.206

Darwin, D.; Barham, S.; Kozul, R.; and Luan, S., 2001, “Fracture Energy of High-Strength Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 98, No. 5, Sept.-Oct., pp. 410-417.

Darwin, D.; Lutz, L. A.; and Zuo, J., 2005, “Recommended Provisions and Commentary on Development and Lap Splice Lengths for Deformed Reinforcing Bars in Tension,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 102, No. 6, Nov.-Dec., pp. 892-900.

Darwin, D.; Zuo, J.; Tholen, M. L.; and Idun, E. K., 1996, “Development Length Criteria for Conventional and High Relative Rib Area Reinforcing Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 93, No. 3, May-June, pp. 1-13.

DeVries, R. A.; Jirsa, J. O.; and Bashandy, T., 1998, “Effects of Transverse Reinforcement and Bonded length on the Side-Blowout Capacity of Headed Reinforcement,” Recent Developments in the Design and Specification of Concrete Paving Systems, SP-180, D. G. Zollinger, ed., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, Oct., pp. 367-390.

DeVries, R. A.; Jirsa, J. O.; and Bashandy, T., 1999, “Anchorage Capacity in Concrete of Headed Reinforcement with Shallow Embedments,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 96, No. 5, Sept.-Oct., pp. 728-737.

Draper, N. R., and Smith, H., 1981, Applied Regression Analysis, second edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 241-249.

Ghimire, K. P.; Darwin, D.; and O’Reilly, M., 2018, “Anchorage of Headed Reinforcing Bars in Concrete,” SM Report No. 127, University of Kansas Center for Research, Lawrence, KS, Jan., 278 pp.

Ghimire, K. P.; Shao, Y.; Darwin, D.; and O’Reilly, M., 2019, “Conventional and High-Strength Headed Bars—Part 1: Anchorage Test,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 116, No. 3, May, pp. 257-266. doi: 10.14359/51714479.

Shao, Y.; Darwin, D.; O’Reilly, M.; Lequesne, R. D.; Ghimire, K.; and Hano, M., 2016, “Anchorage of Conventional and High-Strength Headed Reinforcing Bars,” SM Report No. 117, University of Kansas Center for Research, Lawrence, KS, Aug., 234 pp.

Sperry, J.; Al-Yasso, S.; Searle, N.; DeRubeis, M.; Darwin, D.; O’Reilly, M.; Matamoros, A.; Feldman, L.; Lepage, A.; Lequesne, R.; and Ajaam, A., 2015a, “Anchorage of High-Strength Reinforcing Bars with Standard Hooks,” SM Report No. 111, University of Kansas Center for Research, Lawrence, Kansas, June, 243 pp.

Sperry, J.; Darwin, D.; O’Reilly, M.; and Lequesne, R., 2015b, “Anchorage Strength of Conventional and High-Strength Hooked Bars in Concrete,” SM Report No. 115, University of Kansas Center for Research, Lawrence, Kansas, Dec., 266 pp.

Sperry, J.; Darwin, D.; O’Reilly, M.; Matamoros, A.; Feldman, L.; Lepage, A.; Lequesne, R.; and Yasso, S., 2017, “Conventional and High-Strength Hooked Bars—Part 2: Data Analysis,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 114, No. 1, Jan.-Feb., pp. 267-276. doi: 10.14359/51689457

Thompson, M. K.; Jirsa, J. O.; and Breen, J. E., 2006a, “CCT Nodes Anchored by Headed Bars—Part 2: Capacity of Nodes,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 1, Jan.-Feb., pp. 65-73.

Thompson, M. K.; Ledesma, A.; Jirsa, J. O.; and Breen, J. E., 2006b, “Lap Splices Anchored by Headed Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 2, Mar.-Apr., pp. 271-279.

Thompson, M. K.; Ziehl, M. J.; Jirsa, J. O.; and Breen, J. E., 2005, “CCT Nodes Anchored by Headed Bars—Part 1: Behavior of Nodes,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 102, No. 6, Nov.-Dec., pp. 808-815.

Zuo, J., and Darwin, D., 1998, “Bond Strength of High Relative Rib Area Reinforcing Bars,” SM Report No. 46, University of Kansas Center for Research, Lawrence, KS, Jan., 350 pp.

Zuo, J., and Darwin, D., 2000, “Splice Strength of Conventional and High Relative Rib Area Bars in Normal and High Strength Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 97, No. 4, July-Aug., pp. 630-641.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer