Title:
Superplasticizer-Nanosilica Compatibility: Assessment and Optimization
Author(s):
Harry Brace and Emilio Garcia-Taengua
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
116
Issue:
2
Appears on pages(s):
95-103
Keywords:
chemical admixtures; compatibility; compressive strength; fresh state performance; Marsh funnel test; paste; statistical models
DOI:
10.14359/51714454
Date:
3/1/2019
Abstract:
Nanoparticles can yield significant benefits in cement-based products but can pose problems regarding dispersion and optimal doses. This paper proposes an inexpensive methodology to compare superplasticizers in terms of their compatibility with nanosilica, providing concrete technologists with a practical tool to select the best combinations. A series of cement pastes were produced, incorporating nanosilica and two different superplasticizers at different dosages. Their fresh state performance was assessed by means of the Marsh funnel test, and their compressive strength was determined at 28 days. The compatibility between nanosilica and superplasticizers was defined and described by developing semi-empirical models. These were used to identify optimal combinations which maximize the flowability and compressive strength and minimize their variability. It was concluded that the optimization of cement pastes with nanosilica was feasible only when the superplasticizer used is highly compatible. Careful selection of the superplasticizer proved to be critical in ensuring the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the addition of nanosilica.
Related References:
1. Sonebi, M.; Bassuoni, M. T.; Kwasny, J.; and Amanuddin, A. K., “Effect of Nanosilica on Rheology, Fresh Properties, and Strength of Cement-Based Grouts,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 27, No. 4, Apr. 2015, 11 pp.
2. Svermova, L.; Sonebi, M.; and Bartos, P. J. M., “Influence of Mix Proportions on Rheology of Cement Grouts Containing Limestone Powder,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 25, No. 7, 2003, pp. 737-749. doi: 10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00115-4
3. Jalal, M.; Pouladkhan, A.; Harandi, O. F.; and Jafari, D., “Comparative Study on Effects of Class F Fly Ash, Nano Silica and Silica Fume on Properties of High Performance Self Compacting Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 94, Sept. 2015, pp. 90-104. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.001
4. Barcelo, L.; Kline, J.; Walenta, G.; and Gartner, E., “Cement and Carbon Emissions,” Materials and Structures, V. 47, No. 6, 2014, pp. 1055-1065. doi: 10.1617/s11527-013-0114-5
5. Feynman, R. P., “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom,” Engineering and Science, V. 23, 1960, pp. 22-36.
6. Sanchez, F., and Sobolev, K., “Nanotechnology in Concrete—A Review,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 24, No. 11, 2010, pp. 2060-2071. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.03.014
7. Pacheco-Torgal, F., and Jalali, S., “Nanotechnology: Advantages and Drawbacks in the Field of Construction and Building Materials,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 25, No. 2, 2011, pp. 582-590. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.009
8. Meng, T.; Yu, Y.; Qian, X.; Zhan, S.; and Qian, K., “Effect of Nano-TiO2 on the Mechanical Properties of Cement Mortar,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 29, Apr. 2012, pp. 241-245. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.047
9. Berra, M.; Carassiti, F.; Mangialardi, T.; Paolini, A. E.; and Sebastiani, M., “Effects of Nanosilica Addition on Workability and Compressive Strength of Portland Cement Pastes,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 35, Oct. 2012, pp. 666-675. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.132
10. Biricik, H., and Sarier, N., “Comparative Study of the Characteristics of Nano Silica-, Silica Fume- and Fly Ash-Incorporated Cement Mortars,” Materials Research, V. 17, No. 3, 2014, pp. 570-582. doi: 10.1590/S1516-14392014005000054
11. Kawashima, S.; Hou, P.; Corr, D. J.; and Shah, S. P., “Modification of Cement-Based Materials with Nanoparticles,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 36, Feb. 2013, pp. 8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.06.012
12. Singh, L. P.; Karade, S. R.; Bhattacharyya, S. K.; Yousuf, M. M.; and Ahalawat, S., “Beneficial Role of Nanosilica in Cement Based Materials - A Review,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 47, 2013, pp. 1069-1077. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.052
13. Sobolev, K.; Flores, I.; Hermosillo, R.; and Torres-Martínez, L. M., “Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology for High-Performance Cement Composites,” Nanotechnology of Concrete: Recent Developments and Future Perspectives, SP-254, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2008, pp. 93-120.
14. Sobolev, K.; Flores, I.; Torres-Martinez, L. M.; Valdez, P. L.; Zarazua, E.; and Cuellar, E. L., “Engineering of SiO2 Nanoparticles for Optimal Performance in Nano Cement-Based Materials,” Proceedings of NICOM3 Nanotechnology in Construction 3, June 2009, pp. 139-148.
15. Zapata, L. E.; Portela, G.; Suárez, O. M.; and Carrasquillo, O., “Rheological Performance and Compressive Strength of Superplasticized Cementitious Mixtures with Micro/Nano-SiO2 Additions,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 41, 2013, pp. 708-716. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.025
16. Konsta-Gdoutos, M. S., “Nanomaterials in Self-Consolidating Concrete: A State-of-the-Art Review,” Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, V. 3, No. 3-4, pp. 167-180.
17. Abd El Aleem, S.; Heikal, M.; and Morsi, W. M., “Hydration Characteristic, Thermal Expansion and Microstructure of Cement Containing Nano-Silica,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 59, No. 5, 2014, pp. 151-160. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.039
18. García-Taengua, E.; Sonebi, M.; Hossain, K. M. A.; Lachemi, M.; and Khatib, J., “Effects of the Addition of Nanosilica on the Rheology, Hydration and Development of the Compressive Strength of Cement Mortars,” Composites. Part B, Engineering, V. 81, 2015, pp. 120-129. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.07.009
19. Qing, Y.; Zenan, Z.; Deyu, K.; and Rongshen, C., “Influence of Nano-SiO2 Addition on Properties of Hardened Cement Paste as Compared with Silica Fume,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 21, No. 3, 2007, pp. 539-545. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.09.001
20. Senff, L.; Hotza, D.; Lucas, S.; Ferreira, V. M.; and Labrincha, J. A., “Effect of Nano-SiO2 and Nano-TiO2 Addition on the Rheological Behavior and the Hardened Properties of Cement Mortars,” Materials Science and Engineering, V. 532, Jan. 2012, pp. 354-361. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.10.102
21. Sonebi, M.; García-Taengua, E.; Hossain, K. M. A.; Khatib, J.; and Lachemi, M., “Effect of Nanosilica Addition on the Fresh Properties and Shrinkage of Mortars with Fly Ash and Superplasticizer,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 84, June 2015, pp. 269-276. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.064
22. Horszczaruk, E.; Mijowska, E.; Cendrowski, K.; Mijowska, S.; and Sikora, P., “Effect of Incorporation Route on Dispersion of Mesoporous Silica Nanospheres in Cement Mortar,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 66, 2014, pp. 418-421. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.061
23. de Rojas, M. I. S., and Frías, M., “The Pozzolanic Activity of Different Materials, its Influence on the Hydration Heat in Mortars,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 26, No. 2, 1996, pp. 203-213. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00200-6
24. Senff, L.; Labrincha, J. A.; Ferreira, V. M.; Hotza, D.; and Repette, W. L., “Effect of Nano-Silica on Rheology and Fresh Properties of Cement Pastes and Mortars,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 23, No. 7, 2009, pp. 2487-2491. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.005
25. Kong, D.; Corr, D. J.; Hou, P.; Yang, Y.; and Shah, S. P., “Influence of Colloidal Silica Sol on Fresh Properties of Cement Paste as Compared to Nano-Silica Powder with Agglomerates in Micron-Scale,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 63, 2015, pp. 30-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.08.002
26. Burgos-Montes, O.; Palacios, M.; Rivilla, P.; and Puertas, F., “Compatibility between Superplasticizer Admixtures and Cements with Mineral Additions,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 31, June 2012, pp. 300-309. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.092
27. Nehdi, M.; Mindess, S.; and Aïtcin, P. C., “Optimization of High Strength Limestone Filler Cement Mortars,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 26, No. 6, 1996, pp. 883-893. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(96)00071-3
28. Jolicoeur, C., and Simard, M. A., “Chemical Admixture-Cement Interactions: Phenomenology and Physico-Chemical Concepts,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 20, No. 2-3, 1998, pp. 87-101. doi: 10.1016/S0958-9465(97)00062-0
29. Agulló, L.; Toralles-Carbonari, B.; Gettu, R.; and Aguado, A., “Fluidity of Cement Pastes with Mineral Admixtures and Superplasticizer—A Study Based on the Marsh Cone Test,” Materials and Structures, V. 32, No. 7, 1999, pp. 479-485. doi: 10.1007/BF02481631
30. EN 196-1:2016, “Methods of Testing Cement. Determination of Strength,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2016, 38 pp.
31. EN 445:2007, “Grout for Prestressing Tendons. Test Methods,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2007, 18 pp.
32. Garcia-Taengua, E.; Sonebi, M.; Taylor, S.; Ferrara, L.; Deegan, P.; and Pattarini, A., “Compatibility of Superplasticizers with Cementitious Materials,” BFT International, V. 80, No. 10, Oct. 2014, pp. 44-53.
33. EN 12390-3:2009, “Testing Hardened Concrete - Part 3: Compressive Strength of Test Specimens,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2009, 22 pp.