Title:
Effect of Synthetic Fibers and Aggregate Size on Flexural Crack Widths
Author(s):
Erik Stefan Bernard
Publication:
Structural Journal
Volume:
116
Issue:
3
Appears on pages(s):
19-26
Keywords:
aggregate size; corrosion; crack widths; fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC); flexure; testing
DOI:
10.14359/51713286
Date:
5/1/2019
Abstract:
Cracks can lead to corrosion of steel reinforcement, so limits are placed on maximum allowable in-service crack widths to reduce the likelihood of corrosion during the design life of a reinforced concrete (RC) member. The relatively light level of reinforcement required to meet strength requirements in some applications can result in quite wide in-service crack widths, so either additional steel bar reinforcement or fibers must be included to limit maximum crack widths. The mechanism by which fibers are believed to reduce crack widths in RC flexural members relies on the tensile stress generated by the fibers across cracks. Provided post-crack performance is satisfactory, fibers of any composition should be capable of reducing crack widths in RC members. This investigation has therefore assessed the influence of several high-performance macro-synthetic fibers on flexural crack widths in RC members and has also examined the influence of maximum aggregate size. The results indicate that for a moderate dosage rate (4.0 to 4.5 kg/m3 [6.7 to 7.6 lb/yd3]), the currently examined macro-synthetic fibers reduced flexural crack widths by approximately 20% compared to plain concrete. Maximum aggregate size was also found to influence mean crack spacing but had a negligible effect on crack width.
Related References:
1. Eurocode 2, “Design of Concrete Structures (BS EN 1992-1-1),” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
2. CEB-FIP, “Model Code 2010: Final Draft,” fib Bulletin 65, Fèdération Internationale du Béton, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2012, 350 pp.
3. AFTES, “Design, Dimensioning, and Execution of Precast Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete Arch Segments,” French Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, 2013, 18 pp.
4. Al-Ta’an, S. A., and Al-Feel, J. R., “Prediction of Crack Widths in Fibrous Reinforced Concrete Members,” Fiber Reinforced Cement and Concrete: Recent Developments, Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd., Essex, UK, 1989, pp. 209-218.
5. Stang, H., and Aarre, T., “Evaluation of Crack Width in FRC with Conventional Reinforcement,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 14, No. 2, 1992, pp. 143-154. doi: 10.1016/0958-9465(92)90007-I
6. Abrishami, H. H., and Mitchell, D., “Influence of Steel Fibers on Tension Stiffening,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 94, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1997, pp. 769-776.
7. Bischoff, P. H., “Tension Stiffening and Cracking of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 15, No. 2, 2003, pp. 174-182. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:2(174)
8. Dupont, D., and Vandewalle, L., “Calculation of Crack Widths with the σ-ε Method,” Test and Design Methods for Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete: Background and Experiences, Proceedings of the RILEM TC162-TDF Workshop, RILEM Technical Committee 162-TDF, Bochum, Germany, 2003, pp. 119-144.
9. Jansson, A.; Gylltoft, K.; and Löfgren, I. “Flexural Behaviour of Members with a Combination of Steel Fibers and Conventional Reinforcement,” Nordic Concrete Research, V. 42, 2010, pp. 155-171.
10. Deluce, J. R.; Lee, S.-C.; and Vecchio, F. J., “Crack Model for Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Members Containing Conventional Reinforcement,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 111, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2014, pp. 93-102.
11. Bernard, E. S., “Investigation of Crack Width Control Using Barchip Fibres in Reinforced Concrete Beams,” World Tunneling Congress 2016, San Francisco, CA, Apr. 22-28, 2016.
12. TC 162 TDF, “Test and Design Methods for Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete,” Materials and Structures, RILEM, V. 36, 2003, pp. 560-567.
13. Australian Standard AS3600, Concrete Structures, Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 2014.
14. Gilbert, R. I.; Mickleborough, N. C.; and Ranzi, G., Design of Prestressed Concrete to Eurocode 2, second edition, CRC Press (Spon Press), Boca Raton, FL, 2017.
15. Australian Standard AS3600, “Concrete Structures,” Commentary, Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 2014.
16. EN 14651, “Test Method for Metallic Fibre Concrete. Measuring the Flexural Tensile Strength (Limit of Proportionality (LOP), Residual),” British Standards Institute, London, UK.
17. Şahmaran, M.; Lachemi, M.; Hossain, K. M. A.; Ranade, R.; and Li, V. C., “Influence of Aggregate Type and Size on Ductility and Mechanical Properties of Engineered Cementitious Composites,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 106, No. 3, May-June 2009, pp. 1-9.
18. ASTM C1609/C1609M, “Standard Test Method for Flexural Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (Using Beam With Third-Point Loading),”ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, 9 pp.
19. Australian Standard AS4671, “Steel Reinforcing Materials,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 2001.
20. Tiberti, G.; Minelli, F.; Plizzari, G. A.; and Vecchio, F. J., “Influence of Concrete Strength on Crack Development in SFRC Members,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 45, 2014, pp. 176-185. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.10.004