Effect of Limited Tension Stiffening on Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Panels in Shear

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Effect of Limited Tension Stiffening on Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Panels in Shear

Author(s): Xueying Wang and J. S. Kuang

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 116

Issue: 2

Appears on pages(s): 147-157

Keywords: iterative root-finding technique; reinforced concrete membrane element; shear; tension stiffening; tension-stiffening fixed-angle truss model

DOI: 10.14359/51711140

Date: 3/1/2019

Abstract:
The principal tensile strength of cracked concrete is not well defined in existing models for predicting the shear response of reinforced concrete (RC) membrane elements; hence, the shear strength of RC elements is generally overestimated due to the unrealistic decreasing slope of tensile stress as the crack accumulates. In this paper, the effect of limited tension-stiffening behavior of cracked RC panels under pure shear stresses is investigated by proposing an analytical model named as the tension-stiffening fixed-angle truss model (TFTM). The proposed model includes the limited tension-stiffening effect of post-cracking reinforced concrete and adopts the fixed-angle theory. In the analysis of TFTM, an iterative root-finding technique and a search method genetic algorithm are applied for solving the stress-strain relationship. The limited tension-stiffening effect on RC panels is examined with a series of tests. Predictions by the proposed model show very good agreement with experimental results, and the elapsed time for each calculation loop is reduced significantly.

Related References:

1. Crisfield, M. A., and Wills, J., “Analysis of R/C Panels Using Different Concrete Models,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, V. 115, No. 3, 1989, pp. 578-597. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:3(578)

2. Hsu, T. T. C., “Unified Approach to Shear Analysis and Design,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 20, No. 6, 1998, pp. 419-435. doi: 10.1016/S0958-9465(98)00028-6

3. Navier, C. L., “Résumé des Lecons Données a l’école des Ponts et Chaussées sur l’application de la Mécanique a l’établissment des Constructions et des Machines,” Paris, France, 1826.

4. Collins, M. P., “Towards a Rational Theory for RC Members in Shear,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, V. 104, No. 4, 1978, pp. 649-666.

5. Vecchio, F. J., and Collins, M. P., “The Modified Compression-Field Theory for Reinforced Concrete Elements Subjected to Shear,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 83, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1986, pp. 219-231.

6. Hsu, T. T. C., “Softened Truss Model Theory for Shear and Torsion,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 85, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1988, pp. 624-635.

7. Pang, X. B., and Hsu, T. T. C., “Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Membrane Elements in Shear,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 92, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1995, pp. 665-679.

8. Pang, X. B., and Hsu, T. T. C., “Fixed Angle Softened Truss Model for Reinforced Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 93, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1996, pp. 197-207.

9. Vecchio, F. J., and Collins, M. P., “The Response of Reinforced Concrete to In-Plane Shear and Normal Stresses,” Publication 82-03, University of Toronto, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Toronto, ON, Canada, 1982.

10. Hsu, T. T. C., and Zhang, L. X., “Tension Stiffening in Reinforced Concrete Membrane Elements,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 93, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1996, pp. 108-115.

11. Hsu, T. T. C., and Zhang, L. X., “Nonlinear Analysis of Membrane Elements by Fixed-angle Softened-truss Model,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 94, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 1997, pp. 483-492.

12. Hsu, T. T. C., and Mo, Y. L., Unified Theory of Concrete Structures, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 2010, 518 pp.

13. Belarbi, A., and Hsu, T. T. C., “Constitutive Laws of Softened Concrete in Biaxial Tension-Compression,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 92, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 1995, pp. 562-573.

14. Gupta, A. K., and Maestrini, S. R., “Tension-stiffness Model for Reinforced Concrete Bars,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 116, No. 3, 1990, pp. 769-790. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:3(769)

15. Choi, C. K., and Cheung, S. H., “Tension Stiffening Model for Planar Reinforced Concrete Members,” Computers and Structures, V. 59, No. 1, 1996, pp. 179-190. doi: 10.1016/0045-7949(95)00146-8

16. Kwak, H., and Kim, D., “Nonlinear Analysis of RC Shear Walls Considering Tension-stiffening Effect,” Computers and Structures, V. 79, No. 5, 2001, pp. 499-517. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7949(00)00157-7

17. Belarbi, A., and Hsu, T. T. C., “Constitutive Laws of Concrete in Tension and Reinforcing Bars Stiffened by Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 91, No. 4, July-Aug. 1994, pp. 465-474.

18. Biscaia, H. C.; Chastre, C.; and Silva, M. A. G., “Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of Bond-slip Models for Interfaces between FRP Composites and Concrete,” Composites. Part B, Engineering, V. 45, No. 1, 2013, pp. 1554-1568. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.08.011

19. Rizkalla, S. H.; Hwang, L. S.; and El-Shahawi, M., “Transverse Reinforcement Effect on Cracking Behaviour of R.C. Members,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, V. 10, No. 4, 1983, pp. 566-581. doi: 10.1139/l83-087

20. American Society of Civil Engineers, “State-of-the-Art Report on Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete,” Task Committee on Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1982.

21. MathWorks, “MATLAB R2013b,” The MathWorks Inc, Natick, MA, 2013.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer