Title:
Low-Elevation Impact Tests of Axially Loaded Reinforced Concrete Columns
Author(s):
Tuba Gurbuz, Alper Ilki, David P. Thambiratnam, and Nimal Perera
Publication:
Structural Journal
Volume:
116
Issue:
1
Appears on pages(s):
117-128
Keywords:
column; drop weight impact; dynamic behavior; impact capacity; impact load; impact test; reinforced concrete; shear failure; vehicular impact
DOI:
10.14359/51710862
Date:
1/1/2019
Abstract:
Conventionally, structures are designed to resist dead and live loads. However, there is a rising risk of structural members being subjected to impact loads as a result of unexpected events, accidents, or intentional attacks. In the case of frontal street-level columns of buildings and columns in parking spaces, they can potentially be exposed to high-intensity dynamic loads caused by vehicular impacts. Furthermore, most of these columns are not designed to resist these effects. This research demonstrates the vulnerability of conventionally designed reinforced concrete (RC) columns against vehicle impacts. A special drop-weight test setup was designed and established to simulate the vehicle collision impact in the performed tests. In the scope of this study, four fullscale axially loaded RC members were tested under drop-weight test setups to represent low-elevation transverse impact loads on the specimens. The performance of RC columns under static and impact loading conditions (applied by increased magnitude of impact energy) was examined and the changes in their structural performances were evaluated. The mode of failure was observed to be transformed from pure flexure in static tests into a more brittle character dominated by shear under impact loading conditions. Consequently, conventionally designed RC columns were found highly shear-deficient against vehicular impacts; therefore, they should be designed with a certain safety margin to have reserve shear and deformation capacities to eliminate their vulnerability. Based on the test results, dynamic response ratio recommended for shear-critical RC members can be used in the design of street-level columns against vehicular impact.
Related References:
1. Aydin, S., “Deniz Muzesi sonunda ezildi,” online, available at: http://www.milliyet.com.tr/2001/05/18/yasam/yas10.html (accessed 31 Oct. 2017).
2. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 520 pp.
3. AS3600, “Concrete Structures,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 2004.
4. AASHTO, “Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges,” 17th edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2002.
5. EN 1991-1, “Eurocode 1 Actions on Structures Part 1-7: General Actions & Accidental Actions,” Irish Standards, 2006.
6. El-Tawil, S.; Severino, E.; and Fonseca, P., “Vehicle Collusion with Bridge Piers,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 10, No. 3, 2005, pp. 345-353. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:3(345)
7. Fujikake, K.; Li, B.; and Soeun, S., “Impact Response of Reinforced Concrete Beam and Its Analytical Evaluation,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 135, No. 8, 2009, pp. 938-950. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000039
8. Kishi, N.; Mikami, H.; Matsuoka, K. G.; and Ando, T., “Impact Behaviour of Shear-Failure-Type RC Beams without Shear Rebar,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, V. 27, No. 9, 2002, pp. 955-968. doi: 10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00149-X
9. Kishi, N., and Mikami, H., “Empirical Formulas for Designing Reinforced Concrete Beams under Impact Loading,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 109, No. 4, July-Aug. 2012, pp. 509-519.
10. Soleimani, S. M.; Banthia, N.; and Mindess, S., “Behavior of RC Beams under Impact Loading: Some New Findings,” Sixth International Conference on Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures, Taylor & Francis, Catania, Italy, 2007, pp. 867-874
11. Saatci, S., and Vecchio, F. J., “Effects of Shear Mechanisms on Impact Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 106, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2009, pp. 78-86.
12. Pham, T. M., and Hao, H., “Impact Behaviour of FRP-Strengthened RC Beams without Stirrups,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 20, No. 4, 2016, pp. 1-13. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000671
13. Kishi, N.; Nakano, O.; Matsuoka, K. G.; and Ando, T., “Experimental Study on Ultimate Strength of Flexural-Failure-Type RC Beams under Impact Loading,” Transactions SMiRT 16, Washington, DC, Aug. 2001.
14. Adhikary, S. D.; Li, B.; and Fujikake, K., “Low Velocity Impact Response of Reinforced Concrete Beams: Experimental and Numerical Investigation,” International Journal of Protective Structures, V. 6, No. 1, 2015, pp. 81-111. doi: 10.1260/2041-4196.6.1.81
15. Tang, T., and Saadatmanesh, H., “Analytical and Experimental Studies of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Strengthened Concrete Beams under Impact Loading,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 102, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2005, pp. 139-149.
16. Thilakarathna, H. M. I.; Thambiratnam, D. P.; Dhanasekar, M.; and Perera, N., “Numerical Simulation of Axially Loaded Concrete Columns under Transverse Impact and Vulnerability Assessment,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, V. 37, No. 11, 2010, pp. 1100-1112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.06.003
17. Thilakarathna, H. M. I.; Thambiratnam, D. P.; Dhanasekar, M.; and Perera, N., “Shear-Critical Impact Response of Biaxially Loaded Reinforced Concrete Circular Columns,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 110, No. 4, July-Aug. 2013, pp. 565-574.
18. Dong, C. X.; Kwan, A. K. H.; and Ho, J. C. M., “A Constitutive Model for Predicting the Lateral Strain of Confined Concrete,” Engineering Structures, V. 91, 2015, pp. 155-166. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.02.014
19. Loedolft, M. J., “The Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Cantilever Columns under Lateral Impact Loads,” PhD dissertation, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa, 1989.
20. Remennikov, A. M., and Kaewunruen, S., “Impact Resistance of Reinforced Concrete Columns: Experimental Studies and Design Considerations,” 19th Australasian Conference on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials, New Zealand, Nov. 2006, pp. 817-824.
21. Feyerabend, M., “Der harte Ouerstoff auf Stutzen aus Stahl und Stahlbeton,” PhD thesis, University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 1988.
22. Gurbuz, T.; Ilki, A.; Thambiratnam, D.P.; and Perera, N., “Effects of Loading Rate on Impact Response of Axially Loaded Reinforced Concrete Members and Performance Enhancement by AFRP,” SEMC, South Africa, Sept. 2016.
23. Gurbuz, T., “Impact Performance and Mitigation of Reinforced Concrete Columns,” PhD dissertation, Queensland University of Technology, Australia, 2018 (submitted).
24. Mander, J. B.; Priestley, M. J. N.; and Park, R., “Observed Stress-Strain Behavior of Confined Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 114, No. 8, 1988, pp. 1827-1849. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1827)
25. Seangatith, S., “Characterization and Analysis of Composite Beams Subjected to Impact Loads,” PhD thesis, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, 1997.
26. ASCE Petrochemical, “Design of Blast-resistant Buildings in Petrochemical Facilities,” Task Committee on Blast-Resistant Design of the Petrochemical Committee of the Energy Division, second edition, 2010.
27. Adhikary, S. D.; Li, B.; and Fujikake, K., “Effects of High Loading Rate on Reinforced Concrete Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 111, No. 3, May-June 2014, pp. 651-660.