Title:
Evaluation of Prestressed Concrete Bridges under Light Rail Loading
Author(s):
Yail J. Kim and Yongcheng Ji
Publication:
Structural Journal
Volume:
116
Issue:
1
Appears on pages(s):
171-182
Keywords:
bridge; evaluation; light rail transit; live load; modeling
DOI:
10.14359/51706921
Date:
1/1/2019
Abstract:
This paper presents the evaluation of prestressed concrete bridges carrying light rail loading, which is significantly unexplored relative to bridges subjected to conventional heavy-haul and high-speed trains. Four bridges in Denver, CO, are selected to investigate static and dynamic responses, including flexural behavior, passenger occupancy, statistical properties, live load distributions, natural frequencies, and user comfort. Three-dimensional finite element models are developed to complement in-place findings. The measured train loadings are statistically stable along with Gaussian distributions and increase by 10.8% when their average operating speed rises from 32.9 to 49.0 mph (53 to 78 kmh). Passenger loading that is stochastic in nature also increases the train loading by 23.3%, on average. Existing design approaches for live load distributions deviate from those attained from the field, which is particularly noticeable for interior girders. Deflection control criteria used in practice are not applicable either. In accordance with the deflection and frequency of the bridges, the user comfort of light rail systems (pedestrians and passengers) is assessed. Statistical properties are acquired and characterized, which are valuable when developing design guidelines.
Related References:
1. TRB, Track Design Handbook for Light Rail Transit, second edition, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2012.
2. Black, A., “The Recent Popularity of Light Rail Transit in North America,” Journal of Planning Education and Research, V. 12, No. 2, 1993, pp. 150-159. doi: 10.1177/0739456X9301200210
3. Liu, K.; Reynders, E.; De Roeck, G.; and Lombaert, G., “Experimental and Numerical Analysis of a Composite Bridge for High-Speed Trains,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, V. 320, No. 1-2, 2009, pp. 201-220. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2008.07.010
4. Lu, Y.; Mao, L.; and Woodward, P., “Frequency Characteristics of Railway Bridge Response to Moving Trains with Consideration of Train Mass,” Engineering Structures, V. 42, 2012, pp. 9-22. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.04.007
5. Moreu, F.; Jo, H.; Li, J.; Kim, R. E.; Kimmle, A.; Scola, S.; Le, H.; Spencer, B. F.; and LaFave, J. M., “Dynamic Assessment of Timber Railroad Bridges Using Displacements,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 20, No. 10, 2015, p. 04014114 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000726
6. Yuan, R. L.; Bourland, M.; and Ugarte, E., “Health Monitoring of Light-Rail Aerial-Structural System,” Proceedings of SPIE 4702, Smart Nondestructive Evaluation for Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems, San Diego, CA, 2002, pp. 262-271.
7. Khan, E.; Linzell, D. G.; Frankl, B. A.; Lobo, J. A.; and Lozano, S., “Field Measured Dynamic Effects and Load Distribution in a Prestressed Concrete Light Rail Bridge,” Proceedings of the 2016 Joint Rail Conference (JRC 2016), American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Article No. JRC2016-5765, 2016.
8. AASHTO, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specification, sixth edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2012.
9. AREMA, Manual for Railway Engineering: Vol. 1-4, American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association, Lanham, MD, 2015.
10. Bayoğlu Flener, E., and Karoumi, R., “Dynamic Testing of a Soil-Steel Composite Railway Bridge,” Engineering Structures, V. 31, No. 12, 2009, pp. 2803-2811. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.07.028
11. Remennikov, A. M., and Kaewunruen, S., “A Review of Loading Conditions for Railway Track Structures due to Train and Track Vertical Interaction,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, V. 15, No. 2, 2008, pp. 207-234. doi: 10.1002/stc.227
12. RTD, “Light Rail Design Criteria,” Regional Transit District, Denver, CO, 2013.
13. Nielsen, J. C. O., “High-Frequency Vertical Wheel-Rail Contact Forces—Validation of a Prediction Model by Field Testing,” Wear, V. 265, No. 9-10, 2008, pp. 1465-1471. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2008.02.038
14. AASHTO, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specification (7th edition with 2016 interim revisions), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2016.
15. Ju, S. H., “Finite Element Analysis of Structure Borne Vibration from High-Speed Train,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, V. 27, No. 3, 2007, pp. 259-273. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.06.006
16. Kim, S.-I., “Experimental Evaluations of Track Structure Effects on Dynamic Properties of Railway Bridges,” Journal of Vibration and Control, V. 17, No. 12, 2011, pp. 1817-1826. doi: 10.1177/1077546310385264
17. Martínez-Rodrigo, M. D.; Lavado, J.; and Museros, P., “Dynamic Performance of Existing High-Speed Railway Bridges under Resonant Conditions Retrofitted with Fluid Viscous Dampers,” Engineering Structures, V. 32, No. 3, 2010, pp. 808-828. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.008
18. Okelo, R., and Olabimtan, A., “Nonlinear Rail-Structure Interaction Analysis of an Elevated Skewed Steel Guideway,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 16, No. 3, 2011, pp. 392-399. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000163
19. CAN/CSA-S6-06, “Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code,” CSA International, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2006.
20. Roeder, C. W.; Barth, K.; and Bergman, A., “Improved Live Load Deflection Criteria for Steel Bridges (NCHRP 20-7),” Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2002.
21. UIC, “Design Requirements for Rail-Bridges Based on Interaction Phenomena between Train, Track and Bridge (UIC Code 776-2),” International Union of Railways, Paris, France, 2009.