Title:
Effect of Geopolymer Aggregate on Strength and Microstructure of Concrete
Author(s):
Chamila Gunasekera, David W. Law, and Sujeeva Setunge
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
115
Issue:
6
Appears on pages(s):
899-908
Keywords:
fly ash; geopolymer aggregate; microstructure; pore structure; strength; X-ray tomography
DOI:
10.14359/51706846
Date:
11/1/2018
Abstract:
The properties and microstructure of a novel manufactured geopolymer coarse aggregate have been investigated. The analysis has included compressive and tensile strengths of concretes made with the manufactured geopolymer coarse aggregate and a comparative natural crushed coarse aggregate. In addition, the microstructure and pore structure development of both concretes at the interfacial transition zone (ITZ) and bulk cement matrix were studied though scanning electron microscopy and X-ray computed tomography. The data showed that the novel geopolymer coarse aggregate satisfied the requirements of Australian Standard AS 2758.1 and is comparable to the natural aggregate. The dry density of the geopolymer aggregate concrete was less than that of the natural aggregate being just over 2000 kg/m3 (124.9 lb/ft3), with a mean 7-day strength in excess of 30 MPa (4.44 ksi) and a mean 28-day compressive strength in excess of 40 MPa (5.8 ksi). Moreover, it showed a 60% reduction in porosity between 7 and 28 days with a well compacted and dense ITZ observed at 28 days. In addition, the flexural strength demonstrated a good correlation with compressive strength, comparable to that of the natural aggregate concrete. Overall, the geopolymer investigated in this research shows potential as a lightweight coarse aggregate for concrete, with the additional benefit of reducing the environmental impact of fly ash from coal-fired power generation.
Related References:
1. Malhotra, V. M., “Role of Fly Ash in Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions during the Manufacturing of Portland Cement Clinker,” Second International Conference on Advances in Concrete Technologies in the Middle East Conference Research Papers, Dubai, UAE, 2008.
2. Khale, D., and Chaudhary, R., “Mechanism of Geopolymerization and Factors Influencing Its Development: A Review,” Journal of Materials Science, V. 42, No. 3, 2007, pp. 729-746. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0401-4
3. Chindaprasirt, P., and Chalee, W., “Effect of Sodium Hydroxide Concentration on Chloride Penetration and Steel Corrosion of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete under Marine Site,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 63, No. 1, 2014, pp. 303-310. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.010
4. Alexander, M., and Mindess, S., Aggregates in Concrete, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2010.
5. CCAA, “Performance Benchmarking of Australian Business Regulation: Planning, Zoning and Development Assessments,” Cement Concrete & Aggregates Australia, Mascot, NSW, Australia, 2016, 6 pp., https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/regulation-benchmarking-planning/submissions/sub054.pdf. (Last accessed Oct. 16, 2018)
6. Otsuki, N.; Miyazato, S.-i.; and Yodsudjai, W., “Influence of Recycled Aggregate on Interfacial Transition Zone, Strength, Chloride Penetration and Carbonation of Concrete,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 15, No. 5, 2003, pp. 443-451. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:5(443)
7. Gluth, G. J. G.; Lehmann, C.; Rübner, K.; and Kühne, H.-C., “Reaction Products and Strength Development of Wastepaper Sludge Ash and the Influence of Alkalis,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 45, 2014, pp. 82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.09.009
8. Rao, A.; Jha, K. N.; and Misra, S., “Use of Aggregates from Recycled Construction and Demolition Waste in Concrete,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, V. 50, No. 1, 2007, pp. 71-81. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.05.010
9. Kou, S. C.; Poon, C. S.; and Chan, D., “Influence of Fly Ash as Cement Replacement on the Properties of Recycled Aggregate Concrete,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 19, No. 9, 2007, pp. 709-717. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:9(709)
10. Fournier, B., and Bérubé, M.-A., “Alkali-Aggregate Reaction in Concrete: A Review of Basic Concepts and Engineering Implications,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, V. 27, No. 2, 2000, pp. 167-191. doi: 10.1139/l99-072
11. Tam, V. W. Y.; Gao, X. F.; and Tam, C. M., “Microstructural Analysis of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Produced from Two-Stage Mixing Approach,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 35, No. 6, 2005, pp. 1195-1203. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.025
12. Junaid, M. T.; Khennane, A.; and Kayali, O., “Performance of Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete Made Using Non-Pelletized Fly Ash Aggregates after Exposure to High Temperatures,” Materials and Structures, V. 48, No. 10, 2015, pp. 3357-3365. doi: 10.1617/s11527-014-0404-6
13. Kayali, O., “Flashag-New Lightweight Aggregate for High Strength and Durable Concrete,” 2005 World of Coal Ash (WOCA), Lexington, KY, 2005, 13 pp.
14. Ramamurthy, K., and Harikrishnan, K., “Influence of Binders on Properties of Sintered Fly Ash Aggregate,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 28, No. 1, 2006, pp. 33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.06.005
15. Willis, N. C., Geopolymers and Geopolymer Aggregates, International Publication No. WO2016/023073 A1, World Intellectual Property Organization, International Bureau, Geneva, Switzerland, 2016, 157 pp.
16. Gunasekara, C.; Law, D. W.; and Setunge, S., “Long Term Permeation Properties of Different Fly Ash Geopolymer Concretes,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 124, 2016, pp. 352-362. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.121
17. Provis, J. L., “Geopolymers and Other Alkali Activated Materials: Why, How, and What?,” Materials and Structures, V. 47, No. 1-2, 2014, pp. 11-25. doi: 10.1617/s11527-013-0211-5
18. Diaz-Loya, E. I.; Allouche, E. N.; and Vaidya, S., “Mechanical Properties of Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 108, No. 3, May-June 2011, pp. 300-306.
19. Duxson, P.; Fernández-Jiménez, A.; Provis, J. L.; Lukey, G. C.; Palomo, A.; and van Deventer, J. S. J., “Geopolymer Technology: The Current State of the Art,” Journal of Materials Science, V. 42, No. 9, 2007, pp. 2917-2933. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z
20. De Silva, P.; Sagoe-Crenstil, K.; and Sirivivatnanon, V., “Kinetics of Geopolymerization: Role of Al2O3 and SiO2,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 37, No. 4, 2007, pp. 512-518. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.01.003
21. ASTM C150/C150M-16, “Standard Specification for Portland Cement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 10 pp.
22. Neville, A. M., Properties of Concrete, fourth and final edition; standards updated to 2002, Pearson Education Limited, Harlow, UK, 1996.
23. AS 1012.3.1, “Determination of Properties Related to the Consistency of Concrete—Slump Test,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 2014, pp. 1-7.
24. AS 1141.21, “Methods for Sampling and Testing Aggregates Aggregate Crushing Value,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 1997, pp. 1-9.
25. RC 371.03, “Aggregate Impact Value,” VicRoads Test Method, Melbourne, Australia, 2013, pp. 1-3.
26. AS 1141.23, “Methods for Sampling and Testing Aggregates Los Angeles value,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 2009, pp. 1-7.
27. AS 1141.15, “Methods for Sampling and Testing Aggregates Flakiness index,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 1999, pp. 1-8.
28. AS 1141.24, “Methods for Sampling and Testing Aggregates. Aggregate Soundness—Evaluation by Exposure to Sodium Sulphate Solution,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 2013, pp. 1-10.
29. ASTM C127, “Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, 7 pp.
30. AS 1141.4, “Methods for Sampling and Testing Aggregates. Bulk Density of Aggregate,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 2000, pp. 1-7.
31. ASTM C29/C29M, “Standard Test Method for Bulk Density (“Unit Weight”) and Voids in Aggregate,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 12 pp.
32. RC 376.03, “Accelerated Mortar Bar Test for the Assessment of Alkali-Reactivity of Aggregate,” VicRoads Test Method, Melbourne, Australia, 2012, pp. 1-7
33. AS 1012.20, “Methods of Testing Concrete - Determination of Chloride and Sulfate in Hardened Concrete and Concrete Aggregates,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 1992, pp. 1-9
34. AS 1012.9, “Method of Testing Concrete, Method 9: Determination of the Compressive Strength of Concrete Specimens,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 1999, pp. 1-12.
35. AS 1012.11, “Methods of Testing Concrete—Determination of the Modulus of Rupture,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 2010, p. 1-9.
36. AS 1012.12.2, “Methods of Testing Concrete—Determination of Mass Per Unit Volume of Hardened Concrete—Water Displacement Method,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 1998, pp. 1-10.
37. AS 2758.1, “Concrete Aggregates.” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 2009, pp. 1-7
38. AS 3600, “Concrete Structures,” Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia, 2009, p. 1-278.
39. Demie, S.; Nuruddin, M. F.; and Shafiq, N., “Effects of Micro-Structure Characteristics of Interfacial Transition Zone on the Compressive Strength of Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 41, No. 1, 2013, pp. 91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.067
40. Scrivener, K. L.; Crumbie, A. K.; and Laugesen, P., “The Interfacial Transition Zone (ITZ) between Cement Paste and Aggregate in Concrete,” Interface Science, V. 12, No. 4, 2004, pp. 411-421. doi: 10.1023/B:INTS.0000042339.92990.4c
41. Sofie, S. W., “Fabrication of Functionally Graded and Aligned Porosity in Thin Ceramic Substrates with the Novel Freeze-Tape‐Casting Process,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, V. 90, No. 7, 2007, pp. 2024-2031. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01720.x