Title:
Modifications to ASTM C1293 that Allow Testing of Low‑Alkali Binder Systems
Author(s):
Soley Unnur Einarsdottir and R. Douglas Hooton
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
115
Issue:
5
Appears on pages(s):
739-747
Keywords:
alkali leaching; alkali-silica reaction; durability; lowalkali cement; storage conditions; supplementary cementitious materials; test method
DOI:
10.14359/51702350
Date:
9/1/2018
Abstract:
When carrying out laboratory tests for alkali-silica reaction (ASR) mitigation, the currently used ASTM C1293 method cannot be used for evaluating the benefits of using low-alkali cement. The effects of cement alkali content and supplementary cementitious material (SCM) replacement on the expansion and leaching in the concrete prism test were investigated, as well as ways to minimize alkali leaching. Approximately 45% of the alkalis leach from 100% portland cement (PC) concrete prisms during the 2-year test period. SCM replacement decreased the alkali leaching to approximately 25%, likely due to a more impermeable pore structure. The most effective way to minimize the leaching was to cover the upper two-thirds of each prism with a plastic bag, reducing the alkali leaching to only 10%. By modifying the alkali boosting procedure in the concrete prism test (CPT) and improve the storage conditions to minimize alkali leaching, it is possible to use this test to evaluate the benefits of concrete mixtures made with low-alkali cements and combinations with SCMs.
Related References:
1. Rivard, P.; Bérubé, M.; Olliver, J.; and Ballivy, G., “Decrease in Pore Solution Alkalinity in Concrete Tested for Alkali-Silica Reaction,” Materials and Structures, V. 40, No. 9, 2007, pp. 909-921. doi: 10.1617/s11527-006-9191-z
2. ASTM C1293-08b, “Standard Test Method for Determination of Length Change of Concrete Due to Alkali-Silica Reaction,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015.
3. Lingård, J.; Andiç-Çakir, Ö.; Fernandes, I.; Rønning, T. F.; and Thomas, M. D. A., “Alkali-Silica Reactions (ASR): Literature Review on Parameters Influencing Laboratory Performance Testing,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 42, No. 2, 2012, pp. 223-243. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.10.004
4. Stanton, T. E., “Expansion of Concrete through Reaction between Cement and Aggregate,” Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, V. 66, 1940, pp. 1781-1811.
5. Stanton, T. E., “Studies to Develop an Accelerated Test Procedure for the Detection of Adversely Reactive Cement-Aggregate Combinations,” Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting, V. 43, Pittsburgh, PA, 1943, pp. 875-893.
6. Thomas, M.; Fournier, B.; Folliard, K.; Ideker, J.; and Shehata, M., “Test Methods for Evaluating Preventive Measures for Controlling Expansion due to Alkali-Silica Reaction in Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 36, No. 10, 2006, pp. 1842-1856. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.01.014
7. Lindgård, J.; Sellevold, E. J.; Thomas, M. D. A.; Pedersen, B.; Justnes, H.; and Rønning, T. F., “Alkali-Silica Reaction (ASR) – Performance Testing: Influence of Specimen Pre-Treatment, Exposure Conditions and Prism Size on Concrete Porosity, Moisture State and Transport Properties,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 53, 2013, pp. 145-167. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.05.020
8. Bhatty, M. S., and Greening, N. R., “Some Long Time Studies of Blended Cements with Emphasis on Alkali-Aggregate Reaction,” Proceedings of the 7th International Conference, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1986, pp. 85-92.
9. Rogers, C. A., and Hooton, R. D., “Reduction in Mortar and Concrete Expansion with Reactive Aggregates Due to Alkali Leaching,” Cement, Concrete and Aggregates, V. 13, No. 1, 1991, pp. 42-49. doi: 10.1520/CCA10548J
10. Bérubé, M.-A.; Frenette, J.; Rivest, M.; and Vézina, D., “Measurement of the Alkali Content of Concrete Using Hot-Water Extraction,” 11th International Conference on Alkali-Aggregate Reaction in Concrete, Quebec, QC, Canada, 2000, pp. 159-169.
11. Larive, C.; Joly, M.; and Coussy, O., “Heterogeneity and Anisotropy in ASR-Affected Concrete Consequences for Structural Assessment,” 11th International Conference on Alkali-Aggregate Reaction, Québec City, QC, Canada, 2000, pp. 969-978.
12. Multon, S.; Seignol, J.-F.; and Toutlemonde, F., “Structural Behaviour of Concrete Beams Affected by Alkali-Silica Reaction,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 102, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2005, pp. 67-76.
13. Gautam, B. P., and Panesar, D. K., “Anisotropic Expansion of ASR Affected Concrete Prism Specimens,” XIII International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components - XIII DBMC, São Paulo, Brazil, 2014, pp. 826-833.
14. Rogers, C., and MacDonald, C., “The Geology, Properties and Field Performance of Alkali-Aggregate Reactive Spratt, Sudbury and Pittsburg Aggregate Distributed by the Ontario Ministry of Transportation,” 14th International Conference on Alkali-Aggregate Reaction in Concrete, Austin, TX, 2012.
15. Rogers, C.; Grattan-Bellew, P.; Hooton, R.; Ryell, J.; and Thomas, M., “Alkali-Aggregate Reactions in Ontario,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, V. 27, No. 2, 2000, pp. 246-260. doi: 10.1139/l99-073
16. Thomas, M. D.; Hooton, R. D.; Rogers, C. A.; and Fournier, B., “50 Years Old and Still Going Strong: Fly Ash Puts Paid to ASR,” Concrete International, V. 34, No. 1, Jan. 2012, pp. 35-40.
17. Fournier, B.; Rogers, C.; and MacDonald, C. A., “Multi-Laboratory Study of the Concrete Prism and Accelerated Mortar Bar Expansion Tests with Spratt Aggregate,” 14th International Conference on Alkali-Aggregate Reaction in Concrete, May 20-25, 2012, Austin, TX.
18. Hooton, R. D.; Rogers, C.; MacDonald, C. A.; and Ramlochan, T., “Twenty-Year Field Evaluation of Alkali-Silica Reaction Mitigation,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 110, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2013, pp. 539-548.