Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Strengthened Reinforced Concrete Beams Subjected to Differential Settlement

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Strengthened Reinforced Concrete Beams Subjected to Differential Settlement

Author(s): Yail J. Kim and Aiham Al-Kubaisi

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 115

Issue: 1

Appears on pages(s): 191-202

Keywords: carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP); differential settlement; externally bonded; near-surface-mounted (NSM); strengthening

DOI: 10.14359/51700986

Date: 1/1/2018

Abstract:
This paper presents the behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites subjected to differential settlement. Two types of strengthening schemes—externally bonded (EB) and near-surfacemounted (NSM) CFRP—are tested with various support conditions, and their performance is compared against unstrengthened counterparts. The properties of soils are identified by sieve analysis and load-settlement relationships, including a grain distribution and subgrade reaction moduli with drained and undrained conditions. The post-yield response and energy dissipation characteristics of the beams are influenced by the differential settlement. The ductility of the strengthened beams is less susceptible to settlement in comparison with the unstrengthened ones. Regardless of support conditions, the NSM beams exhibit higher ductility than the EB beams. The development of curvature along the loading span is related to the extent of the differential settlement, which is associated with the occurrence of CFRP debonding and failure modes. Functional requirements for the strengthened beams are evaluated based on angular distortion limits. Moment redistribution mechanisms induced by the differential settlement are elaborated by analytical modeling in conjunction with parametric investigations.

Related References:

1. Holtz, W. G., and Hart, S. S., “Home Construction on Shrinking and Swelling Soils,” Special Publication 11, Colorado Geological Survey, 1978, 18 pp.

2. Skempton, A. W., and MacDonald, D. H., “The Allowable Settlements of Buildings,” Proceedings — Institution of Civil Engineers, V. 5, No. 6, 1956, pp. 727-768. doi: 10.1680/ipeds.1956.12202

3. Moulton, L. K.; GangaRao, H. V.; and Halvorsen, G. T. “Tolerable Movement Criteria for Highway Bridges,” Report No. FHWA/RD-85/107, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 1985, 109 pp.

4. Hearn, G., and Nordheim, K., “Differential Settlements and Inelastic Response in Steel Bridge Beams,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, V. 1633, 1998, pp. 68-73. doi: 10.3141/1633-09

5. Hebeler, G. L.; Ospina, R. I.; Howard, D. K.; and Leistikow, R., “Assessment and Remediation of Geotechnical and Structural Deficiencies at a 5-Story Hotel Experiencing Differential Settlements,” Proceedings of the 5th Congress on Forensic Engineering, 2009, pp. 278-287.

6. Bakis, C. E.; Bank, L. C.; Brown, V. L.; Cosenza, E.; Davalos, J. F.; Lesko, J. J.; Machida, A.; Rizkalla, S. H.; and Triantafillou, T. C., “Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites for Construction—State-of-the-Art Review,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 6, No. 2, 2002, pp. 73-87. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(73)

7. Bank, L. C., Composites for Construction, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2006, 551 pp.

8. Zhang, W., and Kanakubo, T., “Local Bond Stress-Slip Relationship between Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Plates and Concrete under Fatigue Loading,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 111, No. 4, July-Aug. 2014, pp. 955-966. doi: 10.14359/51686781

9. Deng, J.; Tanner, J. E.; Mukai, D.; Hamilton, H. R.; and Dolan, C. W., “Durability Performance of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer in Repair/Strengthening of Concrete Beams,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 112, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2015, pp. 247-257. doi: 10.14359/51687104

10. Parks, J. E.; Brown, D. N.; Ameli, M. J.; and Pantelides, C. P., “Seismic Repair of Severely Damaged Precast Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns Connected with Grouted Splice Sleeves,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 113, No. 3, May-June 2016, pp. 615-626. doi: 10.14359/51688756

11. Williams, B.; Kodur, V.; Green, M. F.; and Bisby, L., “Fire Endurance of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Strengthened Concrete T-beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 105, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2008, pp. 60-67.

12. ACI Committee 440, “Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for Strengthening Concrete Structures (ACI 440.2R-08),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2008, 76 pp.

13. ASTM C39/C39M-16, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 7 pp.

14. Spadea, G.; Swamy, R. N.; and Bencardino, F., “Strength and Ductility of RC Beams Repaired with Bonded CFRP Laminates,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 6, No. 5, 2001, pp. 349-355. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:5(349)

15. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 520 pp.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer