Effect of Coarse Aggregate Size on Shear Behavior of Beams without Shear Reinforcement

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Effect of Coarse Aggregate Size on Shear Behavior of Beams without Shear Reinforcement

Author(s): Qing Deng, Wei-Jian Yi, and Fu-Jian Tang

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 114

Issue: 5

Appears on pages(s): 1131-1142

Keywords: aggregate interlock; beams without shear reinforcement; highspeed photography; maximum aggregate size; nonlinear finite element analysis

DOI: 10.14359/51689720

Date: 9/1/2017

Abstract:
The effect of aggregate size on the shear behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) beams without shear reinforcement was experimentally investigated in this study. Beams with four coarse maximum aggregate sizes were manufactured and tested to shear failure, including 10, 20, 31.5, and 40 mm (0.39, 0.79, 1.24, and 1.58 in.). Two shear span-depth ratios λ = 2.2 and 3.0 were considered. After tests, finite element analysis was carried out to simulate the shear failure process. The results showed that the maximum aggregate size had no or little effect on the tensile strength of concrete, while it improved the shear capacity of RC beams. Once cracked, the normal and tangential displacement between the shear cracks occurred simultaneously, and the aggregate interlock worked all the time. Finite element analysis showed the inclined principal tensile stress within the low-middle part of the web and the tip of the diagonal cracks had significant influence on the development of diagonal cracks.

Related References:

1. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 519 pp.

2. Reineck, K. H.; Bentz, E. C.; Fitik, B.; Kuchma, D. A.; and Bayrak, O., “ACI-DAfStb Database of Shear Tests on Slender Reinforced Concrete Beams without Stirrups,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 110, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2013, pp. 867-875.

3. Vecchio, F. J., and Collins, M. P., “The Modified Compression Field Theory for Reinforced Concrete Elements Subjected to Shear,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 83, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1986, pp. 219-224.

4. Muttoni, A., and Fernández Ruiz, M., “Shear Strength of Members without Transverse Reinforcement as a Function of the Critical Shear Crack Width,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 105, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2008, pp. 163-166.

5. Kotsovos, M. D., “Compressive Force Path: Basis for Ultimate Limit State Reinforced Concrete Design,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 85, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1988, pp. 68-72.

6. Zhang, J.-P., “Diagonal Cracking and Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 49, No. 178, 1997, pp. 55-65. doi: 10.1680/macr.1997.49.178.55

7. Zararis, P. D., and Papadakis, G., “Diagonal Shear Failure and Size Effect in RC Beams without Web Reinforcement,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 127, No. 7, 2001, pp. 733-742. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:7(733)

8. Park, H.-G., and Choi, K.-K., “Strain-Based Shear Strength Model for Slender Beams without Web Reinforcement,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2006, pp. 783-785.

9. Joint ACI-ASCE Committee 445, “Recent Approaches to Shear Design of Structural Concrete (ACI 445R-99) (Reapproved 2009),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1999, 55 pp.

10. Fenwick, R. C., and Paulay, T., “Mechanisms of Shear Resistance of Concrete Beams,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, V. 94, No. 10, 1968, pp. 2328-2336.

11. Taylor, H. P. J., “Shear Strength of Large Beams,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, V. 98, 1972, pp. 2484-2488.

12. Walraven, J. C., “Aggregate Interlock: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis,” PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands, 1980, 197 pp.

13. Ulaga, T., “Betonbauteile mit stab-und lamellenbewehrung: verbund-und zuggliedmodellierung,” PhD thesis, ETHZ, Zurich, Switzerland, 2003, 160 pp. (in German)

14. Guidotti, R., “Poinçonnement des planchers-dalles avec colonnes superposées fortement sollicitées,” PhD thesis, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2007, 189 pp. (in French)

15. Sato, Y.; Tadokoro, T.; and Ueda, T., “Diagonal Tensile Failure Mechanism of Reinforced Concrete beams,” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, V. 2, No. 3, 2004, pp. 327-341. doi: 10.3151/jact.2.327

16. Chana, P. S., “Investigation of the Mechanism of Shear Failure of Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 39, No. 141, 1987, pp. 196-204. doi: 10.1680/macr.1987.39.141.196

17. Sherwood, E. G.; Bentz, E. C.; and Collins, M. P., “Effect of Aggregate Size on Beam-Shear Strength of Thick Slabs,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 104, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2007, pp. 180-183.

18. McCain, K. A., “The Effect of Scale on the Resistance of Reinforced Concrete Beams to Shear,” master’s thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 2012,174 pp.

19. Muttoni, A., and Thürlimann, B., “Shear Tests on Beams and Slabs without Shear Reinforcement,” Institut für Baustatik und Konstruktion, Zürich, Switzerland, 1986, pp. 9-12.

20. Cavagnis, F.; Fernández Ruiz, M.; and Muttoni, A., “Shear Failures in Reinforced Concrete Members without Transverse Reinforcement: An Analysis of the Critical Shear Crack Development on the Basis of Test Results,” Engineering Structures, V. 103, 2015, pp. 157-173. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.015

21. Campana, S.; Fernández Ruiz, M.; Anastasi, A.; and Muttoni, A., “Analysis of Shear-Transfer Actions on One-Way RC Members Based on Measured Cracking Pattern and Failure Kinematics,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 65, No. 6, 2013, pp. 386-404. doi: 10.1680/macr.12.00142

22. Joint ASCE-ACI Committee 326, “Shear and Diagonal Tension—Part 1,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 59, No. 1, Jan. 1962, pp. 22-25.

23. CAN/CSA A23.3-04, “Design of Concrete Structures,” Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga, ON, Canada, 2004, 214 pp.

24. Jendele, L., and Cervenka, J., “Finite Element Modelling of Reinforcement with Bond,” Computers & Structures, V. 84, No. 28, 2006, pp. 1780-1791. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.04.010

25. Collins, M. P.; Bentz, E. C.; Quach, P. T.; and Proestos, G. T., “The Challenge of Predicting the Shear Strength of Very Thick Slabs,” Concrete International, V. 37, No. 11, Nov. 2015, pp. 29-30.

26. Yu, Q., and Bažant, Z. P., “Can Stirrups Suppress Size Effect on Shear Strength of RC Beams?” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 137, No. 5, 2011, pp. 607-617. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000295

27. Cervenka, V.; Jendele, L.; and Cervenka, J., “ATENA Program Documentation—Part 1: Theory,” Cervenka Consulting Ltd., Prague, Czech Republic, 2012, 280 pp.

28. Červenka, J., and Papanikolaou, V. K., “Three-Dimensional Combined Fracture–Plastic Material Model for Concrete,” International Journal of Plasticity, V. 24, No. 12, 2008, pp. 2192-2220. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.01.004

29. Hilsdorf, H. K., and Brameshuber, W., “Code-Type Formulation of Fracture Mechanics Concepts for Concrete,” Current Trends in Concrete Fracture Research, Springer, the Netherlands, 1991, pp. 62-66.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer