Anchor Displacement Behavior during Simultaneous Load and Crack Cycling

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Anchor Displacement Behavior during Simultaneous Load and Crack Cycling

Author(s): Philipp Mahrenholtz and Rolf Eligehausen

Publication: Materials Journal

Volume: 113

Issue: 5

Appears on pages(s): 645-652

Keywords: concrete anchor; cumulative damage; displacement behavior; headed bolt; seismic actions; simultaneous load and crack cycling

DOI: 10.14359/51689109

Date: 9/1/2016

Abstract:
Anchors used in seismic applications have to resist cyclically pulsating loads and cyclically opening and closing cracks which potentially intersect the anchor location. In reality, cyclic load and cyclic crack phenomena act on anchors simultaneously; however, seismic tests in laboratories are carried out with either one of the two parameters kept constant. To investigate the effect of simultaneous load and crack cycling on anchor behavior, experimental tests with synchronized load and crack cycling protocols on headed bolts cast in special concrete specimens were carried out. The test results demonstrate that the anchor displacement depends on the phasing of load and crack cycling, and justify the reduction of the constant anchor load during simulated cyclic crack tests to compensate for disregarded load cycling effects. The influence of various phase lags and different frequencies on the relative anchor displacement is described by an analytical model based on the integrated cumulative damage regime.

Related References:

1. Eligehausen, R., and Balogh, T., “Behavior of Fasteners Loaded in Tension in Cracked Reinforced Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 92, No. 3, May-June 1995, pp. 365-379.

2. Mahrenholtz, P., and Eligehausen, R., “Post-Installed Concrete Anchors in Nuclear Power Plants: Performance and Qualification,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, V. 287, 2015, pp. 48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.03.004

3. DIBt KKW Leitfaden, “Leitfaden für Dübelbefestigungen in Kernkraftwerken und anderen kerntechnischen Anlagen (Guideline for Fastenings in Nuclear Power Plants and Other Nuclear Technical Facilities),” Deutsches Institut für Bautechnik (DIBt), Berlin, Germany, 2010. (in German)

4. ETAG, 001, “Guideline for European Technical Approval of Metal Anchors for Use in Concrete, Parts 1 – 6,” European Organization for Technical Approvals (EOTA), Brussels, Belgium, 1997.

5. ACI Committee 355, “Qualification of Post-Installed Mechanical Anchors in Concrete (ACI 355.2-07) and Commentary,” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2007, 35 pp.

6. ACI Committee 349, “Code Requirements for Nuclear Safety-Related Concrete Structures (ACI 349-06) and Commentary,” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2006, 153 pp.

7. Petersen, D.; Lin, Z.; and Zhao, J., “Behavior and Design of Cast-in-Place Anchors under Simulated Seismic Loading—Cyclic Behavior of Single Headed Anchors,” Final Report (Volume I) NEESR Project, Department of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, 2013.

8. EN 1992-4, “Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures—Part 4: Design of Fastenings for Use in Concrete,” European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2016.

9. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 519 pp.

10. Furche, J., “Zum Trag- und Verschiebungsverhalten von Kopfbolzen bei Zentrischem Zug (Load-Bearing and Displacement Behavior of Headed Bolts under Centric Tension Load),” dissertation, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, 1994.

11. Hoehler, M., “Behavior and Testing of Fastenings to Concrete for use in Seismic Applications,” dissertation, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, 2006.

12. Hoehler, M., and Eligehausen, R., “Behavior and Testing of Anchors in Simulated Seismic Cracks,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 105, No. 3, May-June 2008, pp. 348-357.

13. Mahrenholtz, C., and Eligehausen, R., “Dynamic Performance of Concrete Undercut Anchors for Nuclear Power Plants,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, V. 265, 2013, pp. 1091-1100. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.09.038

14. Mahrenholtz, P., “Experimental Performance and Recommendations for Qualification of Post-Installed Anchors for Seismic Applications,” dissertation, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, 2012.

15. ETAG 001 Annex E, “Guideline for European Technical Approval of Metal Anchors for Use in Concrete—Annex E: Assessment of Metal Anchors under Seismic Actions,” Brussels, Belgium, 2013.

16. Wood, R., and Hutchinson, T., “Crack Protocols for Anchored Components and Systems,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 110, No. 3, May-June 2013, pp. 391-401.

17. Sharma, A.; Mahrenholtz, C.; Eligehausen, R.; Reddy, G.; Vaze, K.; Ghosh, A.; and Kushwawa, H., “Evaluation of Load on Anchor for Concrete Structures Corresponding to Maximum Crack Width—A Probabilistic Approach,” International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, V. 3, No. 4, 2010, pp. 798-811.

18. Mahrenholtz, P.; Hutchinson, T.; and Eligehausen, R., “Shake Table Tests on Suspended Nonstructural Components Anchored in Cyclically Cracked Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 140, No. 11, 2014, pp. 1325-1343. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000979


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Materials Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer