Title:
Evaluation Protocol for Concrete Aggregates Containing Iron Sulfide Minerals
Author(s):
A. Rodrigues, J. Duchesne, B. Fournier, B. Durand, M. H. Shehata, and P. Rivard
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
113
Issue:
3
Appears on pages(s):
349-359
Keywords:
deterioration; evaluation protocol; internal sulfate attack; iron sulfides oxidation; testing methods
DOI:
10.14359/51688828
Date:
5/1/2016
Abstract:
Several cases of concrete deterioration involving sulfide-bearing aggregates have been reported over the years. However, no specific guidelines are currently available to enable making a precise decision on the deleterious potential of aggregates containing iron sulfide minerals. The aim of this paper is to provide an innovative assessment protocol to evaluate the potential deleterious effects of iron-sulfide-bearing aggregates prior to their use in concrete. The findings of this paper are based on tests developed within the past few years as part of a major research project. The protocol is divided into three major phases: 1) total sulfur content measurement; 2) oxygen consumption evaluation; and 3) an accelerated mortar bar expansion test. Tentative limits are proposed for each phase of the protocol, which still need to be validated through the testing of a wider range of aggregates.
Related References:
1. Guarantee Plan for New Residential Buildings. July 2015, http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca/.
2. Rodrigues, A.; Duchesne, J.; Fournier, B.; Durand, B.; Rivard, P.; and Shehata, M., “Mineralogical and Chemical Assessment of Concrete Damaged by the Oxidation of Sulfide-Bearing Aggregates: Importance of Thaumasite Formation on Reaction Mechanisms,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 42, No. 10, 2012, pp. 1336-1347. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.06.008
3. Janzen, M. P.; Nicholson, R. V.; and Scharer, J. M., “Pyrrhotite Reaction Kinetics Reaction Rates for Oxidation by Oxygen, Ferric Iron, and for Nonoxidative Solution,” Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, V. 64, No. 9, 2000, pp. 1511-1522. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00421-4
4. Belzile, N.; Chen, Y. W.; Cai, M.-F.; and Li, Y., “A Review on Pyrrhotite Oxidation,” Journal of Geochemical Exploration, V. 84, No. 2, 2004, pp. 65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2004.03.003
5. Thomas, J. E.; Skinner, M. W.; and Smart, R. S. C., “A Mechanism to Explain Sudden Changes in Rates and Products for Pyrrhotite Dissolution and Acid Solution,” Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, V. 65, No. 1, 2001, pp. 1-12. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00503-2
6. Tagnit-Hamou, A.; Saric-Coric, M.; and Rivard, P., “Internal Deterioration of Concrete by the Oxidation of Pyrrhotitic Aggregates,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 35, No. 1, 2005, pp. 99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.030
7. Casanova, I.; Agullo, L.; and Aguado, A., “Aggregate Expansivity Due to Sulphide Oxidation – I. Reaction System and Rate Model,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 26, No. 7, 1996, pp. 993-998. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(96)00085-3
8. Rodrigues, A.; Duchesne, J.; and Fournier, B., “Microscopic Analysis of the Iron Sulfide Oxidation Products Used in Concrete Aggregates,” 34th International Conference on Cement Microscopy, Halle-Saale, Germany, 2012.
9. Rodrigues, A.; Duchesne, J.; and Fournier, B., “Petrographic Characterization of the Deterioration Products of a Concrete Containing Sulfide Bearing Aggregates; A Particular Case of Internal Sulfate Attack,” 35th International Conference on Cement Microscopy, Chicago, IL, 2013.
10. CSA A23.1-14/A23.2-14, “Concrete Materials and Methods of Concrete Construction/Test Methods and Standard Practices for Concrete,” Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga, ON, Canada, 2014, 668 pp.
11. French Standard NF P18-301: “Granulats naturels pour bétons hydrauliques,” Association Française de Normalisation, 1983, 10 pp.
12. BS EN 12620, “Aggregates for Concrete,” British Standards Institution, London, UK, 2003, 48 pp.
13. ASTM C294-12, “Standard Descriptive Nomenclature for Constituents of Concrete Aggregates,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, 11 pp.
14. ASTM C33/C33M, “Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, 11 pp.
15. ASTM C1260-14, “Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Aggregates (Mortar Bar Method),” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, 5 pp.
16. CSA A23.2-27A, “Standard Practice to Identify Degree of Alkali-Reactivity of Aggregates and to Identify Measures to Avoid Deleterious Expansion in Concrete,” Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga, ON, Canada, 2014, 691 pp.
17. CSA A23.2-26A,“Determination of Potential Alkali-Carbonate Reactivity of Quarried Carbonate Rocks by Chemical Composition,” Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga, ON, Canada, 2014, 691 pp.
18. BNQ 2560-500, “Aggregate Material Sulfate Swelling Potential Petrographic Index Determination – SPPI Evaluation Test Method,” BNQ (Bureau de normalisation du Québec), 2003.
19. Elberling, B.; Nicholson, R. V.; Reardon, E. J.; and Tibble, P., “Evaluation of Sulfide Oxidation Rates: A Laboratory Study Comparing Oxygen Fluxes and Rates of Oxidation Product Release,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, V. 31, No. 3, 1994, pp. 375-383. doi: 10.1139/t94-045
20. Rodrigues, A.; Duchesne, J.; and Fournier, B., “Quantitative Assessment of the Oxidation Potential of Sulfide-Bearing Aggregate in Concrete Using an Oxygen Consumption Test,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 67, 2016, pp. 93-100.
21. Rodrigues, A.; Duchesne, J.; and Fournier, B., “A New Accelerated Mortar Bar Test to Assess the Potential Deleterious Effect of Sulfide-Bearing Aggregate in Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 73, 2015, pp. 96-110. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.02.012
22. CSA A23.1-14, Annex P (informative), “Impact of Sulphides in Concrete Aggregate on Concrete Behaviour,” Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga, ON, Canada, 11 pp.
23. ASTM C1778-14, “Standard Guide for Reducing the Risk of Deleterious Alkali-Aggregate Reaction in Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, 11 pp.