International Concrete Abstracts Portal

In order to be cost-effective, surface repairs carried out on concrete structures have to perform satisfactorily over a sufficient period of time. Among the factors that can affect the durability of concrete repairs, drying shrinkage is certainly one of the most significant. Shrinkage compensating concretes (ShCC’s) represent a very attractive alternative to prevent shrinkage cracking in repairs. This paper summarizes the results of a project devoted to repair ShCC’s made with an expansive component, more specifically their robustness as a function of selected parameters. The investigated expansive systems were either, a calcium sulfoaluminate-based (ASTM Type K cement or Type K component) or calcium oxide-based (ASTM Type G component). The assessment of robustness addressed the influence of the mixture design parameters (cement composition, type and dosage of expansive agent, w/cm ratio) and the curing conditions (moist curing conditions, temperature) upon the ShCC’s expansive behavior, the bond between ShCC repairs and an existing concrete substrate, and the chemical prestress generated through the bond. Overall, the results yielded in this study demonstrate the remarkable potential of ShCC’s as crack-resistant and durable repair materials.

Owners, engineers, and contractors have been forced to contend with drying shrinkage for as long as portland cement has been used in slabs-on-ground, containment structures, and other concrete elements. The resulting cracks and warping have long-lasting impacts on both the performance of the concrete and the lifetime maintenance cost. Various construction methods have historically been used to mitigate this issue including modified mix designs, curing compounds, joint detailing, and transfer devices to reduce warping (curling). With advances in type K shrinkage compensating cement technology, however, designers and contractors now have access to a concrete that can eliminate shrinkage cracks, extend joint spacing to extremes, vastly reduce costly joint construction, and shorten construction schedules. This solution reduces not only construction costs but also maintenance costs on the structure for years to come. Shrinkage compensating concrete (SCC) produced using ASTM C845 Type K cement has been used in floors, elevated building decks, bridge decks, post-tensioned concrete, and containment structures since the mid 1960’s. Today, Type K SCC cement technology is even better understood, making way for higher performing concrete elements.

In the modern transportation industry, nearly all bridge decks are constructed of concrete. Of the concrete bridge decks currently in service across the US, almost all contain large numbers of cracks. These cracks are the bane of deck longevity. They allow the ingress of salts that cause corrosion of the reinforcing steel, exacerbating concrete cracking and loss of structural capacity. A survey conducted several years ago by Folliard et al. (2004) for the FHWA found that more than 100,000 bridges suffered from early-age cracking. This paper presents a case study of bridge decks in Ohio and Michigan that are essentially crack-free. Some of these bridge decks are located on high volume highways/interstates and are up to 30 years of age. In addition, several of these bridges have adjacent standard Portland cement concrete sister bridges built at the same time, with identical spans and construction details handling traffic flowing in the opposite direction. Comparison of these bridges offers unique insight into a simple, effective solution for mitigation of bridge deck cracking.

Shrinkage compensating concrete is one of the most common products currently used to mitigate the influence of drying shrinkage cracking in slabs, beams and other structural components. Type K expansive concretes have proved effective for prevention of structural and aesthetic damage due to tensile cracking in many modern applications. However, the ACI 223R-10 technical guide still indicates that a shrinkage compensating slab cannot expand adequately if it is surrounded on all sides by mature reinforced concrete. The objective of this project was to investigate whether the presence of a stiff external restraint condition, which may be provided by adjoining concrete, prevents a Type K expansive concrete slab from compensating for shrinkage. To investigate this behavior, the field condition of a slab-to-slab interaction was simulated using a steel restraint system with varying degrees of stiffness and amounts of Type K expansive cement component. Test frames were instrumented to evaluate the force and displacement responses of the Type K expansive concrete to the different boundary conditions provided by varying the steel restraint system. The results of this investigation support a conclusion contrary to that currently found in the ACI 223R-10 guiding document. This study concludes that a Type K expansive cement concrete does not suffer a severe reduction in shrinkage compensation in the presence of a very stiff boundary condition.

This paper reexamines the authors’ experimental results on the dimensional stability of concrete slab-on-ground under a variety of environmental conditions. The experiments considered the dimensional properties of concrete slab materials using both Demec targets and vibrating wire strain gages. Realistic slab-on-ground sections were investigated in this study in that the concrete slabs were exposed to a controlled environment on the top surface and to actual ground moisture on the bottom surface. The concrete materials tested were normal Portland cement concrete (PCC), high strength concrete (HSC), concrete with shrinkage reducing admixtures (SRA), and concrete with calcium sulfoaluminate cement (CSA). The compiled database contains: 1) standard concrete material test results; 2) joint movements in concrete slab-on-ground; and 3) internal relative humidity and temperature through the slab-on-ground depth. The experimental results revealed that CSA was quite stable with little long-term shrinkage/cracking or warping, whereas PCC and HSC had continuing crack growth during 600 days of curing. The SRA exhibited a modest reduction in shrinkage/crack at the early stage, and while this decrease extended for the length of the testing no further decrease in the shrinkage growth or sectional stability was noted when compared to PCC at the end of 2 years. Evaluation of the vibrating wire strain gage method of measuring long term concrete shrinkage was found to be less prone to user bias and more accurate than the Demec target method or the ASTM C157 method.