International Concrete Abstracts Portal

"The American Concrete Institute sponsored an unprecedented six technical sessions on FRP Reinforcement for Concrete at the Vancouver Conference on March 28-31, 1993. Speakers and attendees were present from Europe, Japan, Canada and the United States. The papers in this Special Publication are organized in the same subject areas as the conference. The subject topic areas and symposium sections are: 1. FRP Material Properties and Testing Methods 2. FRP Reinforcement for Reinforced Concrete 3. FRP Reinforcement for Prestressed Concrete 4. Analysis And Design 5. The Japanese National Project for FRP Development 6. Applications of FRP Reinforcement The 55 technical papers in this report represent the most comprehensive compilation to date of FRP research, design, and application information. A comparison of the papers provides an insight to the approach to the use and development of FRP reinforcement within the research communities of Europe, Japan and North America. The two symposium volumes are also significant because substantial portions of the extensive Japanese national research project have been translated into English. The Japanese papers provide an insight to both the magnitude of the technical work being conducted in Japan and the organization of the Japanese research program." Note: The individual papers are also available as .pdf downloads.. Please click on the following link to view the papers available, or call 248.848.3800 to order. SP138

Flexural and shear behavior of prestressed concrete (PC) beams using carbon or aramid fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP or AFRP) rods are investigated experimentally and compared with those using prestressing steel bars. Since moduli of elasticity of AFRP and CFRP are about 1/4 and 2/3 that of prestressing steel bars, respectively, the deflection of beams using FRP rods is larger and ultimate flexural and shear strengths of beams are smaller than those of PC beams using prestressing steel bars with similar tensile strength of tendons and web reinforcement. The ultimate flexural and shear strengths and deflection of PC beams using FRP rods are improved by an increase of prestress in beams. 229-493

Research and development of FRP bars and cables for reinforcement of concrete structures has recently been carried out. The basic behavior of concrete members reinforced with these FRP bars has become clear. However, there are still debatable points in terms of design concept, such as the recommended failure mode or required toughness and ductility. The authors carried out loading tests of 16 concrete beams reinforced with carbon FRP bars and cables to discuss both the serviceability and ultimate limit states. The specimens included RC, PC, and PPC members. The main factors were bond properties of the FRP reinforcement and prestress force. The experimental results show that cracking and deformation behavior vary with the prestress force and bond property of FRP bars, and that the reasonable serviceability condition will be achieved by controlling these factors. Also, failure mode was affected by these factors and the reinforcing systems, despite the fact that these specimens have almost the same reinforcement ratio. In relation to the failure mode, the energy absorption, which is defined as the area enclosed by the load-deflection curve, was measured to determine toughness and ductility in the ultimate limit state. The authors recommend that the design take into account the toughness based on energy absorbed before the maximum load.

Analysis of the experimental results obtained by testing 45 concrete specimens reinforced with fiber reinforced plastic (FRP) reinforcing bars is outlined. Theoretical correlations with experimental results are conducted in terms of elastic and ultimate bending moment, crack width, and bond and development length. Emphasis is placed on the beam bending analysis and design using regular as well as high-strength (4 to 10 ksi) concrete reinforced with FRP bars by modifying the state-of-the-art design per ACI 318-89 provisions applicable for steel reinforced beams. However, modifications (from the current ACI Building Code) for FRP reinforced beams in terms of ultimate moment capacity, crack pattern, and development length are made without deviating significantly from the design philosophy given in ACI 318-89. Equations for design loads and bending, resistance, bond and development lengths, and crack widths are developed in a simplified form for practical design applications. Similarities and parallels of these design equations with current ACI 318-89 equations are maintained when possible.

Utilizing fiber reinforced plastic (FRP) reinforcement for concrete guideway structures in a superconductive magnetically levitated train system is desirable because FRP reinforcement is diamagnetic. For the design of guideway structures using FRP reinforcement, performance of structural reinforced concrete (RC) and prestressed concrete (PC) members must be understood. Flexural behavior of these members can be predicted by conventional design procedures, taking the mechanical properties of FRP reinforcement into account. However, shear-resisting behavior of RC and PC members has not yet been clarified, for the following reasons. 1. Unlike flexural behavior, shear-resisting behavior is complicated. 2. An experimental equation for shear capacity of RC members using reinforcing steel does not appear to be applicable, since such mechanical properties as Young's modulus and elongation are different from those of reinforcing steel. Under these circumstances, the authors carried out a basic experiment on shear capacity of rectangular beams using FRP tendons and FRP shear reinforcement. As a result, the following factors are elucidated. 1. Shear capacity of RC beams without shear reinforcement can be predicted to some degree by taking into account the tension stiffness of FRP reinforcement. 2. It seems possible to predict contribution of prestress to shear capacity from decompression moment. 3. Contribution of FRP shear reinforcement to shear capacity is smaller than the value calculated by truss analogy. The reasons seem to be related to experimental results showing that the maximum strain value of FRP shear reinforcement at shear failure is smaller than the elongation of FRP reinforcement.