International Concrete Abstracts Portal

With discussion by Edward G. Nawy, H.A. Sawyer, M.Z. Cohn, and E.F.P. Burnett and C.W. Yu. An attempt is made to evaluate our present knowledge with regard to the analysis and design of reinforced concrete linear structural systems at ultimate load. The fundamental difference between the moment curvature concept and moment rotation concept is emphasized and discussed in detail. The authors have attempted to outline previous significant work, to underline a few basic principles, bearing in mind the difference between these two concepts, and to indicate the present extent of our knowledge of this subject with an appreciation of the assumptions and simplifications that are entailed. Readers are assumed to have some basic knowledge of some of the better known work on the subject, such as Sawyer’s or Baker’s work.

With discussion by Theodore Zsutty, Jack R. Benjamin, C. Allen Cornell, and Milik Tichy and Milos Vorlicek. Because the ultimate strength and deformation ability of critical sections are random variables, the ultimate strength of a structure must likewise be a random variable. If the structure is subjected to load from one source and there is only one possible collapse mechanism, the determination of the ultimate strength ZU of the structure is simple. If the structure is subjected to load from one source but there are m possible collapse mechanisms, it becomes necessary to analyze the structure with the aid of equations of the type given herein. The ultimate strengthZUj, for j = 1, 2, . . . , m of the structure is determined by means of each of these equations assuming the occurrence of the j-th collapse mechanism. The probability pUj that the structure will change into the jth mechanism may be ascertained for a definite value of the load for each random variable ZUj But the actual probability of failure must be expressed with the aid of the so-called conditional probabilities since the individual mechanisms are not always statistically independent. If the structure is subjected to load from v sources and there are m possible collapse mechanisms an equation for the jth mechanism will graphically be represented by an interaction diagram. For a given population of structures, identical according to the design, there exists a number of possible combinations of load with a corresponding probability of failure pU. Geometrically speaking, they are points in the v - dimensional space. Their locus is the so called boundary of the safe domain IImin. When the deformation ability of a structure is considered, the system of equations forms the starting point. In this instance the random variable Zuj is a linear combination of ultimate moments MUi and the ultimate plastic rotation 0U of the section. The statistical solution is analogous with the previous one. It may be demonstrated that the variability in ultimate strength of a redundant structure is lower than that of a statically determinate one in all cases. Consequently, the application of the statistical method must result in savings of material in redundant structures.

With discussion by Milik Tichy and Milos Vorlicek; and Herbert A. Sawyer, Jr. Because structural failure generally occurs in successively more severe stages at successively less probable loads, design should ideally account for all stages and be based on comprehensive analysis utilizing a comprehensive, non-linear, force-strain relationship. The criterion for optimum design, using the failure-stage-versus-load profile, is derived. For frames, a method of comprehensive analysis based on a multilinear moment-curvature relationship, using critical moments and "plasticity factors," is presented. Procedures and the relative economics of comprehensive design and its special cases, elastic, plastic, and ultimate strength designs, are compared. A bilinear design procedure for concrete frames, based on two failure stages, is presented.

SP12 Contains the proceedings of the 1964 International Symposium on Flexural Mechanics of Reinforced Concrete. In addition to providing a more basic understanding of the complex, non-ideal flexural behavior of reinforced concrete, this publication aims to further both immediate and long-range objectives in improving the analytical and statistical basis for the flexural design of reinforced concrete.

The usage of a high speed digital computer in the investigation of long concrete columns as integral parts of building frames is outlined. Extensive use of the computer was made in both the interpretation of data obtained in physical testing and in analytical studies utilizing idealized mathematical models. Numerical procedures were facilitated by development of a rapid and versatile method for obtaining the relationship between axial load, bending moment, and curvature for rectangular reinforced concrete members. A general program is presented which simulates the behavior of a rectangular frame by use of the method of successive approximations and with predictor and corrector functions based on the axial load-moment-curvature characteristics of both the column and its restraining frame members. The method recognizes the nonlinear characteristics of the problem and considers inelastic action, axial load effects, and the varying reduction instiffness of reinforced concrete members. Verification of many of the analytical procedures was obtained in a series of tests of isolated eccentrically loaded long columns under statically determinate load conditions. A series of tests of columns as integral parts of frames indicated that the analytical procedure can predict the mode of failure and type of long column action to be expected. Quantitative accuracy was shown to be reasonable with major discrepancies directly attributable to shortcomings in the failure criteria postulated for reinforced concrete sections. The analytical procedure showed itself to be a promising tool available for further exploration of long column behavior.