International Concrete Abstracts Portal

Q; What cover depth should be used for balconies with post-tensioned (PT) and mild reinforcement? Q: I have been informed that ACI 315-99, Details and Detailing of Concrete Reinforcement,¹ has been superseded. Which ACI document serves as a replacement to this standard?

Editors: Carlos E. Ospina, Denis Mitchell and Aurelio Muttoni

fib Bulletin 81 reports the latest information available to researchers and practitioners on the analysis, design and experimental evidence of punching shear of structural concrete slabs. It follows previous efforts by the International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib) and its predecessor the Euro-International Committee for Concrete (CEB), through CEB Bulletin 168, Punching Shear in Reinforced Concrete (1985) and fib Bulletin 12, Punching of structural concrete slabs (2001), and an international symposium sponsored by the punching shear subcommittee of ACI Committee 445 (Shear and Torsion) and held in Kansas City, Mo., USA, in 2005.

This bulletin contains 18 papers that were presented in three sessions as part of an international symposium held in Philadelphia, Pa., USA, on October 25, 2016. The symposium was co-organized by the punching shear sub-committee of ACI 445 and by fib Working Party 2.2.3 (Punching and Shear in Slabs) with the objectives of not only disseminating information on this important design subject but also promoting harmonization among the various design theories and treatment of key aspects of punching shear design. The papers are organized in the same order they were presented in the symposium. The symposium honored Professor Emeritus Neil M. Hawkins (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA), whose contributions through the years in the field of punching shear of structural concrete slabs have been paramount.

The papers cover key aspects related to punching shear of structural concrete slabs under different loading conditions, the study of size effect on punching capacity of slabs, the effect of slab reinforcement ratio on the response and failure mode of slabs, without and with shear reinforcement, and its implications for the design and formulation in codes of practice, an examination of different analytical tools to predict the punching shear response of slabs, the study of the post-punching response of concrete slabs, the evaluation of design provisions in modern codes based on recent experimental evidence and new punching shear theories, and an overview of the combined efforts undertaken jointly by ACI 445 and fib WP 2.2.3 to generate test result databanks for the evaluation and calibration of punching shear design recommendations in North American and international codes of practice. Sincere acknowledgments are extended to all authors, speakers, reviewers, as well as to fib and ACI staff for making the symposium a success and for their efforts to produce this long-awaited bulletin. Special thanks are due to Laura Vidale for preparing the bulletin for publication.

Note: The individual papers are also available. Please click on the following link to view the papers available, or call 248.848.3800 to order. SP-315

Size effect has been theoretically and experimentally acknowledged as a phenomenon influencing the shear and punching shear strength of concrete structures, with reducing unitary shear strength for increasing member sizes. For members failing in shear, as beams or one-way slabs without transverse reinforcement subjected to uniform loading, size effect has been shown to have a variable influence, with low significance for failures governed by limit analysis (strength or yield criterion) and large influence for members failing in a brittle manner. When the response of a member failing in shear can be reasonably approximated by a linear behaviour (i.e. linear relationship between the acting shear force and the crack widths), the predictions of Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM) can be applied to asymptotically large specimen sizes. This phenomenon can for instance be demonstrated by the Critical Shear Crack Theory (CSCT) and leads to a dependence of the shear strength with the power-1/2 of the size of the specimen. Nevertheless, in actual structures failing in shear (such as slabs or shells), the structural response is normally characterized by some level of redundancy and capacity to redistribute internal forces in the longitudinal and transversal directions. In this case, the relationship between the acting shear force and the crack widths is not linear (with lower crack widths associated with larger shear strengths) and the influence of size effect on the shear strength is milder than that predicted by LEFM. With respect to punching (shear failures due to concentrated loads in two-way slabs), a similar behaviour is observed with respect to size effect. A low dependency can be observed when limit analysis governs whereas for brittle failures, size effect becomes significant. In this case, it can be observed that the behaviour of slabs is highly nonlinear (as for redundant members failing in shear), and the crack openings are to a large extent dependent on local and structural tension-stiffening effects. This deviates the actual behaviour from the one predicted by LEFM and modifies the influence of size effect, which becomes less significant than the predicted behaviour according to LEFM. In this paper, this phenomenon is investigated by means of the CSCT, providing a consistent frame to analyse size and strain effects accounting for realistic slab responses.

Local yielding of the top flexural reinforcement above a column can induce punching failure. Slabs supported directly on columns without beams or shear capitals (flat plates) are vulnerable to flexure-induced punching failure when the amount of the flexural reinforcement above the column is not adequate. Provisions of ACI 318-14 and CSA A23.3-14 give the value of the nominal shear strength as function of specified concrete strength, geometry of slab and column and the shear reinforcement. The present research specifies the minimum amount and layout of flexural reinforcement that takes flexure-induced punching into account. These requirements are satisfied in current code design for many practical cases. A code change is proposed to cover all cases.

Recommendations are presented for proposed revisions to the punching shear provisions of ACI 318-14 in order to recognize the limitations imposed on punching shear capacity by low amounts of slab flexural reinforcement and by slab depth effects. The influence of those two factors is investigated by examining relevant experimental results from tests on slab-column assemblages and slab systems.