International Concrete Abstracts Portal

Repeated vehicle loading causes a decrease in transverse joint stiffness in concrete pavements due to damage accumulation around dowel bars. The relationship between key design parameters and damage accumulation is not well established due to limited faulting performance data and a lack of experimental data from expensive full-slab testing. A novel laboratory test setup was developed to characterize damage development caused by repeated vehicle loads. This setup was used to characterize damage for a range of key parameters at a lower cost and level of effort compared to full-scale slab testing. The concept of beam deflection energy, DE_Beam, is also introduced. Experimental results were used to develop a DE_Beam prediction model. The novel test setup developed in this study enables the rapid evaluation of a variety of dowel materials and geometries, and experimental results can be used to improve current faulting prediction performance.

Traditional analytical models have commonly been employed to assess the progressive collapse performance of building structures subjected to seismic loads. However, few studies addressed the effect of initial damage to adjacent components following the failure of a key component under explosion loads. In this paper, a damage assessment method for reinforced concrete structures was proposed based on the component analytical model, taking into account damage to adjacent members caused by close-in explosive scenarios. The reliability of the proposed analytical model was validated through comparison with experimental results in the existing literature. Besides, comparing the damage levels of a five-story reinforced concrete frame with those predicted by the proposed component models, the proposed assessment method based on components for predicting the damage degree of a reinforced concrete frame was validated to be reliable under a close-in explosion. The results indicated that the proposed analytical model can offer the advantage of not requiring a complex modelling process or the consideration of safety concerns associated with field explosion testing by comparing to numerical models of equivalent accuracy and experimental results.

A slag-based zero-cement concrete (ZC) was newly developed as an alternative, eco-friendly material to Portland cement concrete. To investigate the bond performance between ZC and steel reinforcing bars, lap splice tests were conducted for ZC beams. Fourteen beams (two cementitious normal concrete (NC) beams and twelve ZC beams) were tested at the ages of 6 days (45 MPa (6.53 ksi)) and 28 days (60 MPa (8.7 ksi)). For steel reinforcement, Grade 600 MPa (87.0 ksi) reinforcing bars were used. The test parameters included the concrete type, concrete strength (i.e., concrete age), reinforcing bar diameter, concrete cover thickness, ratio of actual lap splice length to required lap splice length, and use of stirrups. The test results showed that the performance of ZC beams was comparable to that of the counterpart NC beams in terms of moment–deflection relationship, damage mode, and reinforcing bar stress at the peak load. This result indicates that the bond performance of ZC was equivalent to that of NC with identical compressive strength. The bar development length specified in current design codes safely predicted the reinforcing bar stress of the ZC beams at failure: current design codes are applicable to the reinforcing bar development length design of ZC members.

Previous research studies have been conducted to study the seismic response of low-aspect-ratio reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls when designed using normal-strength reinforcement (NSR) versus high-strength reinforcement (HSR). Such studies demonstrated that the use of HSR has the potential to address several constructability issues in nuclear construction practice by reducing the required steel areas and subsequently reinforcing bar congestion. However, the response of nuclear RC shear walls (that is, aspect ratios of less than 1) with both HSR and axial loads has not been yet evaluated under ground motion sequences. As such, most nuclear design standards restrict the use of HSR in nuclear RC shear wall systems. Such design standards do not also consider the influence of axial loads when the shear-strength capacity of such walls is calculated. To address this gap, the current study investigates the influence of axial load on the performance of nuclear RC shear walls with HSR when subjected to ground motion sequences using hybrid simulation testing and modeling assessment techniques. In this respect, two RC shear walls (that is, W1-HSR and W2-HSR-AL) with an aspect ratio of 0.83 are investigated. Wall W2-HSR-AL had an axial load of 3.5% of its axial compressive strength, whereas Wall W1-HSR had no axial load. The test walls were subjected to a wide range of ground motion records, from operational basis earthquake (OBE) to beyond design basis earthquake (BDBE) levels. The experimental results of the walls are discussed in terms of their damage sequences, cracking patterns, ductility capacities, effective periods, and reinforcing bar strains. The test results were then used to develop and validate a numerical OpenSees model that simulates the seismic response of nuclear RC shear walls with different axial load levels. Finally, the experimental and numerical results were compared to the current ASCE 41 backbone model for RC shear walls. The experimental results demonstrate that Walls W1-HSR and W2-HSR-AL showed similar crack patterns and subsequent shear-flexure failures; however, the former had wider cracks relative to the latter during the different ground motion records. In addition, the axial load reduced the displacement ductility of Wall W2-HSR-AL by 18% compared to Wall W1-HSR. Moreover, the ASCE 41 backbone model was not able to adequately capture the seismic response of the two test walls. The current study enlarges the experimental and numerical/analytical database pertaining to the seismic performance of low-aspect-ratio RC shear walls with HSR to facilitate their adoption in nuclear construction practice.

This paper presents the implications of variable bond for the behavior of concrete beams with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars alongside shear-span-dependent load-bearing mechanisms. Experimental programs are undertaken to examine element- and structural-level responses incorporating fully and partially bonded reinforcing bars, which are intended to represent sequential bond damage. Conforming to published literature, three shear span-depth ratios (av/d) are taken into account: arch action (av/d < 2.0), beam action (3.5 ≤ av/d), and a transition from arch to beam actions (2.0 ≤ av/d < 3.5). When sufficient bond is provided for the element-level testing (over 75% of 5db, where db is the reinforcing bar diameter), the interfacial failure of GFRP is brittle against a concrete substrate. An increase in the av/d from 1.5 to 3.7, aligning with a change from arch action to beam action, decreases the load-carrying capacity of the beams by up to 40.2%, and the slippage of the partially bonded reinforcing bars dominates their flexural stiffness. Compared with the case of the beams under beam action, the mutual dependency of the bond length and shear span is apparent for those under arch action. As far as failure characteristics are concerned, the absence of bond in the arch-action beam prompts crack localization; by contrast, partially bonded ones demonstrate diagonal tension cracking adjacent to the compression strut that transmits applied load to the nearby support. The developmental process of reinforcing bar stress is dependent upon the av/d and, in terms of using the strength of GFRP, beam action is favorable relative to arch action. Analytical modeling suggests design recommendations, including degradation factors for the calculation of reinforcing bar stresses with bond damage when subjected to arch and beam actions.