International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The geometry of arched (vertically curved) reinforced concrete (RC) members contributes to the development of additional stresses, affecting their flexural and shear strengths. This aspect of curvilinear RC members reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars has not been reported in the literature. In addition, no specific design recommendations consider the effect of curvilinearity on the flexural and shear strengths of curved GFRP-RC members. This study has performed pioneering work in developing models to predict the flexural and shear strengths of curvilinear GFRP-RC members, with a focus on precast concrete tunnel lining segments. Eleven full-scale curvilinear GFRPreinforced tunnel segment specimens were tested under bending load as the experimental database. Then, a model was developed for predicting the flexural strength of curvilinear GFRP-RC members. This was followed by the development of two shear-strength prediction models based on the Modified Compression Field Theory (MCFT) and critical shear crack theory (CSCT). After comparing the experimental and analytical results, a parametric study was performed to evaluate the effect of different parameters on the flexural and shear strengths of curvilinear GFRP-reinforced members. The results indicate that neglecting the curvilinearity effect led to a 17% overestimation of the flexural strength, while the proposed models could predict the flexural strength of the specimens accurately. The proposed models based on the MCFT—referred to as the semi-simplified Modified Compression Field Theory (SSMCFT) and the improved simplified Modified Compression Field Theory (ISMCFT)—predicted the shear strength of the specimens with 28% conservativeness. In addition, the modified critical shear crack theory (MCSCT) model was 10% conservative in predicting the shear strength of curvilinear GFRP-RC members.

This study addressed a critical knowledge gap by examining the influence of staggering on the bond strength of lapped glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars in concrete members. It involved a comprehensive investigation of new-generation GFRP bars with varying staggering configurations in nine large-scale GFRP-reinforced concrete (RC) beams with a rectangular cross section of 300 x 450 mm (11.8 x 17.7 in.) and a length of 5200 mm (204.7 in.). The tests investigated splice strength with three staggering distances: 0, 1.0, and 1.3 times the splice length (ls) from center-to-center of two adjacent splices, and three splice lengths of 28, 38, and 45 times the bar diameter (db). Results revealed a slight improvement in ultimate load-carrying capacity (less than 10%) for partially and fully staggered splices compared to non-staggered ones, with the latter exhibiting a more ductile failure mode. The effect of staggering was consistent across different splice lengths, demonstrating that splice length was not a factor. Although staggering reduced flexural crack width, it increased the total number of cracks due to expanded splice regions. Bond strength improved with staggering, with gains of 4.0% and 8.0% for partially and fully staggered splices, respectively. ACI CODE- 440.11-22 provides more accurate predictions of the bond strength of lap-spliced GFRP bars than the other design codes, showing an average test-to-prediction ratio of 1.03 for non-staggered splices. Nevertheless, it requires some reconsiderations when it comes to staggered splices. To address this, a proposed modification factor was introduced to account for staggering conditions when calculating bond strength and splice length in ACI CODE-440.11-22.

Design codes such as ACI 318-19 and AASHTO LRFD permit the use of high-strength steel in specific provisions. Particularly, reinforcing bars with yield strength of 100 ksi (689 MPa) and size as large as No. 11 (No. 36) are permitted for use in tension lap splices. However, the test data using larger-diameter bars, especially No. 11 high-strength bars, is limited. In this study, four largescale reinforced concrete beams with No. 11 bars were tested in four-point bending. The beams were grouped in two groups: one used Grade 60 (420) steel while the other used Grade 100 (690) steel. Within each group, one beam had continuous bars, while the second beam had spliced bars. Test results showed that splicing No. 11 (No. 36) high-strength reinforcing bars had adequate load-carrying capacity; however, the crack width may not be adequate. Therefore, test results indicate that using No. 11 (No. 36) high-strength reinforcing bars in tension lap splice applications should be used with caution.

Slag-based zero-cement concrete (ZC) of high strength (60 MPa [8.70 ksi]) was developed as an eco-friendly construction material. In the present study, to investigate the structural behavior of precast columns using ZC, cyclic loading tests were performed for five column specimens with reinforcement details of ordinary moment frames. Longitudinal reinforcement was connected by sleeve splices at the precast column–footing joint. The test parameters included the concrete type (Portland cement-based normal concrete [NC] vs. ZC), construction method (monolithic vs. precast), longitudinal reinforcement ratio, and sleeve size. The test results showed that the structural performance (failure mode, strength, stiffness, energy dissipation, and deformation capacity) of the precast ZC columns was comparable to that of the monolithic NC and precast NC columns, and the tested strengths agreed with the nominal strengths calculated by ACI 318-19. These results indicate that current design codes for cementitious materials and sleeve splice of longitudinal reinforcement are applicable to the design of precast ZC columns.

This study employs advanced nonlinear finite element modeling to investigate Interface Shear Transfer (IST) behavior in RC connections, a crucial factor for bridge durability and safety. The research examines shear transfer mechanisms at the interface between precast girders and cast-in-place deck segments through three experimental methods: beam, push-off, and Iosipescu four-point bending tests. FE simulations evaluated stress distributions, IST capacity, and failure mechanisms. Validation against experimental data shows that the Iosipescu test provides the most accurate representation of IST behavior, exhibiting a stress distribution error margin of only 1%, closely aligning with observed failure patterns. In contrast, the push-off test showed a 30% deviation from empirical data, indicating reduced accuracy in predicting real-world IST behavior. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating the Iosipescu test into IST evaluation protocols, as its greater precision enhances design methodologies for concrete bridges, reduces structural failure risks, and informs future updates to IST-related codes.