International Concrete Abstracts Portal

Several approaches are currently used to proportion recycled aggregate concrete (RAC), each having limitations. An effective and universal way to proportion RAC is not only an important tool for developing high-quality concrete but also a critical milestone for promoting the wider use of recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) in concrete. A mixture design method based on particle packing and excess paste theory is proposed in this study. Given the focus on pavement concrete, the modified Box Test was used to quantify RAC workability. RAC mixtures with five different RCAs of varying quality, developed using the proposed method, showed excellent workability (Box Test Rating E1-S1), whereas mixtures developed with conventional mixture design methods failed to achieve adequate workability. Mechanical properties of optimized RACs were either comparable or improved. The adverse effect of RCA on concrete resistivity and shrinkage appeared negligible and was mitigated by the mixture design approach developed in this study. Compared with conventional Direct Weight Replacement (DWR)/Direct Volume Replacement (DVR) mixtures, the proposed design achieved a reduction of surface voids by more than 80%, up to 25% higher compressive strength, and 20% lower shrinkage at 28 days, while maintaining comparable resistivity.

As recycled concrete reaches the end of its service life, a new generation of coarse recycled aggregate (CRA) is created. Although the variables influencing the physical properties of CRA are well understood, the performance of multi-recycled coarse aggregate (MRCA) remains insufficiently explored, being essential to study how the modified properties could affect the performance of recycled concrete. This research involved five recycling cycles to evaluate the properties of MRCA and its impact on the mechanical and durability performance of concrete made with 75% MRCA. The findings indicate that water absorption, porosity, and abrasion of MRCA increase with each recycling cycle. Although the mechanical behaviour of the concretes appears to be unaffected by the number of recycling cycles, the elastic modulus is negatively impacted when MRCA is used. Furthermore, while some permeability properties are significantly influenced by each recycling cycle, both water penetration depth and resistance to sulfate attack remain largely unchanged.

The growing generation of construction and demolition waste necessitates the development of effective recycling strategies to address environmental concerns. This study investigated the replacement of natural fine aggregate (NFA) with recycled fine aggregate (RFA) at 0, 50, and 100% using two treatment methods: (i) sodium silicate (SS)–silica fume (SF) pre-soaking treatment (SS-T) and (ii) organic treatment (OA-T) with bio-additives derived from Persea macranta, Haritaki, and Ciccus glauca roxb. A quantitative comparison of the aggregate and mortar quality was conducted for each method. The combined application of SST and OT demonstrated an 85% improvement in workability and a 68% reduction in water absorption for RFA. Mortar experiments revealed up to 76% improvement in compressive and flexural strengths compared with untreated RFA mortar. Microstructural analyses (SEM, EDS, XRD, and FT-IR) confirmed the enhanced bond strength and mineral composition. This study highlights the potential of SST and OT to produce durable, high-performance RFA mortars using locally available, economical bio-additives.

Accelerated carbonation treatment is recognized as an effective method for enhancing recycled aggregates (RA), but its potential in structural concrete, particularly with respect to seismic performance, remains underexplored. To address this gap, this study is the first to integrate mesoscale modeling with structural finite element analysis (FEA) to systematically investigate the seismic behavior of carbonated recycled aggregate concrete (CRAC) shear walls under dynamic loading. At the material scale, uniaxial compression tests on CRAC cylindrical specimens with varying replacement ratios were conducted to evaluate their stress–strain behavior and mechanical properties. A mesoscale model of CRAC was developed using a random aggregate placement method, and FEA was employed to extend the analysis of replacement ratios. At the structural scale, a CRAC shear wall FEA model was established, incorporating the material-level stress–strain relationships into cyclic lateral loading simulations. Parametric analysis revealed that increasing both the axial load ratio and the replacement ratio significantly reduced the seismic performance of CRAC shear walls, with a maximum reduction of 21.7%. Based on these findings, recommended ranges for RA replacement ratios and axial load ratios are proposed, providing practical guidance for the structural application of CRAC.

The use of recycled plastic aggregate in cement-based materials has emerged as a promising strategy to reduce plastic waste and promote sustainable construction. However, the inherent hydrophobicity of plastic surfaces poses a significant challenge by limiting their bonding with the cement matrix. This review critically examines five major surface treatment methods, such as coating, oxidation, silane, plasma, and radiation, to enhance the compatibility of recycled plastic aggregates in cementitious composites. Coating with materials such as waterglass, slag powder, or acrylic resins improved compressive strength by up to 78% depending on the coating type. Oxidation using hydrogen peroxide or calcium hypochlorite increased hydrophilicity and improved strength by approximately 10%–30%, while excessive treatment with NaOH-hypochlorite mixtures reduced strength by up to 60%. Silane treatment significantly enhanced surface bonding, resulting in improved mechanical properties. Plasma treatment demonstrated high efficiency, reducing contact angles from ~108° to 44.0° within 30 seconds. Radiation treatment using gamma rays and microwaves increased surface roughness and strength, with gamma irradiation at 100–200 kGy leading to substantial improvements in compressive strength and surface morphology. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first review to systematically compare the effectiveness, mechanisms, and limitations of these surface treatments specifically for recycled plastic aggregates in cement-based materials. This review also highlights the practical challenges of scaling such treatments, including energy demand, chemical handling, and cost, and identifies future directions such as bio-based coatings and nanomaterial functionalization. The findings provide critical insight into optimizing surface treatments to improve the mechanical performance, durability, and sustainability of concrete incorporating plastic aggregates, supporting their broader adoption in sustainable construction practices.