In today’s market, it is imperative to be knowledgeable and have an edge over the competition. ACI members have it…they are engaged, informed, and stay up to date by taking advantage of benefits that ACI membership provides them.
Read more about membership
Become an ACI Member
Founded in 1904 and headquartered in Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, the American Concrete Institute is a leading authority and resource worldwide for the development, dissemination, and adoption of its consensus-based standards, technical resources, educational programs, and proven expertise for individuals and organizations involved in concrete design, construction, and materials, who share a commitment to pursuing the best use of concrete.
American Concrete Institute
38800 Country Club Dr.
Farmington Hills, MI
Feedback via Email
Home > Publications > International Concrete Abstracts Portal
The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.
Title: Comparison of ACI, AISC, and Basic Methods for CFTs
Author(s): B. M. Shahrooz and W. Zhang
Publication: Special Publication
Appears on pages(s): 29-50
Keywords: columns; high-strength concrete; tests
Abstract:Using experimental data from previous tests and detailed analytical studies, the applicability of ACI and AISC standard techniques for concrete-filled tubular columns (CFTs) is evaluated. The test specimens include short and slender CFTs made with normal and high strength steel tubes filled with normal and high strength concrete. The focus of this paper is on rectangular and square tubes. To gauge the success of the code-based methods, the capacities are also computed by the fiber analysis techniques, along with a member level iteration algorithm for analyzing members with significant length. The results indicate that the ACI and AISC methods can yield substantially different capacities. In general, the capacities from the ACI method are reasonably close to those obtained from detailed analytical methods so long as normal strength tubes are used. Both the ACI moment magnifier method and AISC method are appropriate for slender CFTs although the ACI method tends to match the analytically calculated capacities more closely. Neither the ACI nor AISC method is applicable for CFTs made with high strength steel tubes as both techniques substantially underestimate the capacity of such columns. For CFTs with high strength steel tubes, it is more appropriate to assume that the steel tube fully yields when the capacity is developed. A revised version of the ACI standard method was developed by incorporating this assumption. The revised ACI method provides a fairly close estimate of the experimentally obtained capacities and those from detailed analysis.
Click here to become an online Journal subscriber